Reducing Dietary Added-Sugar Consumption During the Transition to College (ASUsugarLIA)

Effects of a Novel Intervention to Reduce Dietary Added-Sugar Consumption During the Transition to College: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this cluster randomized controlled trial was to compare the effects of two single-session interventions (sugar-intensive vs. general health control) on added sugar intake, motivation to reduce sugar consumption, and factual knowledge about added sugar 6 weeks later, in a sample of first-semester undergraduates.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Dietary Added Sugar Consumption
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Sugar Intensive Treatment; Behavioral: General Health Control

Detailed Description

Excessive sugar consumption is recognized as a critical public health concern. For many young adults, the transition to college presents both risk and a promising opportunity to encourage formation of healthy dietary habits. Capitalizing on this window of opportunity, we conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two single-session interventions on added sugar intake in a sample of first-semester undergraduates. Participants received either an intervention primarily focused on reducing added sugar consumption or a general health behavior intervention with units on physical activity, sleep, and healthy diet. Participants' added sugar intake, motivation to reduce sugar consumption, and factual knowledge about added sugar intake were compared at follow-up.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 702
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Arizona
    • Tempe, Arizona, United States, 85287
      • Arizona State University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Students aged 18 years and older, enrolled in online sections of a required transition-to-college course at a large public university in the Southwest region of the U.S. All students in online sections of this class received the single-session intervention during their normal class period, early in the Fall 2020 semester, and were eligible to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Age < 18 years.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sugar Intensive Treatment; The Sugar-Intensive Intervention touched on exercise, sleep, and other aspects of healthy diet, but focused primarily on added sugar reduction. Beyond defining added sugar, the sugar-intensive intervention also included: information on how sugar is metabolized; description of health risks associated with excessive added sugar; opportunities to rehearse women's and men's recommended daily maxima; a game guessing the sugar content of various foods and beverages; information on proportion of undergraduates at their university who report being motivated to reduce their sugar intake; training in finding added-sugar information in nutritional labels; and concrete suggestions for replacing high-sugar foods and beverages with healthy options, and managing tempting situations.	Behavioral: Sugar Intensive Treatment; see arm description
Active Comparator: General Health Control; The General Health Intervention presentation covered Healthy People 2030 goals regarding physical activity (aerobic exercise, strength training), healthy eating (fruit, vegetable, and whole grain consumption; decreasing consumption of saturated fats and added sugar), and sleep (minimum of 7 hours per night), as well as healthy stress management/emotion regulation. The health benefits/risks associated with each goal were described, along with suggested strategies for achieving each goal. This version of the intervention also included a definition of added sugar and information about the recommended daily added-sugar maxima for women and men, but served mainly as an active control condition for testing the effects of the target intervention of interest.	Behavioral: General Health Control; see arm description

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change from Baseline Added-Sugar Consumption at 6 Weeks	Change from baseline in consumption of specific high-sugar foods and beverages each day during the week preceding assessment. Using a matrix with days as columns and food/beverage items as rows, participants reported number of servings consumed of each food per day of that week: regular soda/pop/sweet iced tea (12oz), energy drinks (1 can), fully sweetened sports drinks (12oz), sugar-syrup coffee drinks (small = 8-12 oz = 1 serving; med = 1.5 servings; large = 2 servings), mixed drinks/cocktails (1 drink), donut/sweet pastry/danish (1 whole), muffin/cake-type bread slice (1 whole), fresh flavored yogurt (½ cup), cookie/brownie (3 oz), cupcake/slice of cake (1 whole), slice of pie (1 whole), ice cream/frozen yogurt (½ cup), and candy (¼ cup). Servings were multiplied by grams added sugar/serving for each item based on the National Cancer Institute Dietary Health Questionnaire-III, and summed across items to obtain total weekly added sugar.	6 weeks post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Motivation to reduce added-sugar consumption	"How motivated are you to reduce your added-sugar consumption?" Response options were 1 = Not at all motivated, 2 = A little motivated, 3 = Somewhat motivated, and 4 = Very motivated.	6 weeks post-intervention
Added sugar factual knowledge	Participants' knowledge of factual information regarding added sugar was assessed through three sets of questions. The first set of knowledge checks included eight statements about added sugar that participants marked as true or false (e.g., "Glucose is the primary fuel used by the human body"); the number of correct answers was summed. Second, participants were presented with a list of 12 ingredients (e.g., aspartame, honey, stevia) and asked to report whether each ingredient counts as added sugar; again, number of correct answers was summed. Third, participants were asked to state the maximum grams of added sugar per day recommended by the American Heart Association, separately for women and men, as presented in the intervention.	6 weeks post-intervention
Change from Baseline Sleep at 6 Weeks	Participants indicated the amount of sleep they got, in hours, for each of the last seven nights. Participants were presented with seven text boxes labeled "7 days ago", "6 days ago" … "Last night," and asked to fill in the number of hours slept for each. Responses were averaged to obtain a single hours/night score.	6 weeks post-intervention
Change from Baseline Exercise at 6 Weeks	Exercise was defined for participants as "any physical activity that gets the heart working much faster, makes you break a sweat, and/or requires a lot of muscle effort." Participants indicated the amount of exercise they got for each of the last seven days; response options for each day were: "none", "15 minutes", "30 minutes", "45 minutes", "60 minutes", and "more than 60 minutes." Responses were averaged to obtain a single minutes/day score.	6 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Arizona State University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 8, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): October 30, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 27, 2023
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 10, 2023
• First Posted (Actual): April 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 21, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 10, 2023
• Last Verified: April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: eating behavior; added sugar
• Other Study ID Numbers: ASU SugarStudy LIA101

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Anonymized data, study protocol, and analytic code will be made publicly available via OSF upon acceptance of the first manuscript for publication.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Upon acceptance of the initial manuscript reporting study results for publication; permanently
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL; ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No