Impact of Implementing the Modified A-DIVA Scale on Successful Access to a Venous Line on the First Attempt (DIVAPERF)

February 28, 2024 updated by: Centre Jean Perrin

Peripheral venous access (PVA), although commonly used, can be a difficult procedure for patients with precarious venous capital. The difficulty of insertion can lead to multiple attempts, with the consequences of pain, anxiety, delayed management and worsening of the potentially already precarious venous capital. One study assessed the risk of failure according to a score based on venous status criteria. This study first established a link between venous status criteria and the risk of failure. The criteria defined as determinants were used to establish a venous status score. The data were then repeated by analyzing the success rate as a function of the scale score. A clear link between score and risk of failure was established. It seems worthwhile to evaluate the impact of implementing this scale prior to the placement of a peripheral venous line.

The hypothesis is that obtaining a score predictive of failure would modify the therapeutic attitude of the registered nurse. They would opt for techniques that would increase their chances of success. This in turn would lead to a reduction in unsuccessful attempts, which generate pain and anxiety for the patient. Preserving venous capital by increasing first-attempt success is both a health issue for the patient and a guarantee of quality of care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63011
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Jean Perrin
        • Contact:
          • Judith PASSILDAS JAHANMOHAN, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lucie MADELAINE
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Chu Gabriel Montpied
        • Contact:
          • Virginie HAUTEMAYOU
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Virginie HAUTEMAYOU
      • Lyon, France, 69004
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital de La Croix Rousse
        • Contact:
          • Charline TAUREAU
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charline TAUREAU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patient of legal age included in a care program requiring a VVP;
  • Fluency in French
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme;
  • Written, signed and dated informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • As the A-DIVA scale specifies a search for venous access to the upper limb, any patient without an upper limb or with a condition that contraindicates VVP placement in the upper limbs will be excluded;
  • Patients treated as emergencies;
  • Patients with a language barrier or known significant cognitive or psychiatric disorders;
  • Patients under guardianship, curatorship, deprivation of liberty or legal protection;
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control arm
Nurses will place a peripheral venous line on these patients without having been trained in the venous status score predictive of failure.
Experimental: Experimental arm
Nurses will place a peripheral venous line on these patients after being trained in the venous status score predictive of failure.
Nurses are trained in the A-DIVA scale and its predictive failure score. This score enables them to adapt their approach to peripheral venous line insertion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate of peripheral venous vein placement
Time Frame: 1 year
Success rate of peripheral venous vein insertion on the first attempt in the 2 groups (group in which VVP insertion will be performed by nurses not trained in the A-DIVA score and group in which VVP insertion will be performed after score assessment by nurses trained in the A-DIVA score) expressed by the number of attempts equal to 1.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of attempts
Time Frame: 1 year
Total number of attempts
1 year
Number of visualization techniques, alternative devices and/or third-party assistance used
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of visualization techniques, alternative devices and/or third-party assistance used
1 year
Number of years' experience of nurses since obtaining diploma in nursing
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of years' experience of nurses since obtaining diploma in nursing
1 year
Pain score: Numerical Pain Scale
Time Frame: 1 year
The pain score is based on a numerical pain scale ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing unbearable pain.
1 year
A-DIVA scale score
Time Frame: 1 year
The A-DIVA score (Adult Difficult Intravenous Access Score) predicts the difficulty of infusing an adult. The score ranges from 0 to 5, with 0 being the lowest risk of difficulty, and 5 being the highest.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lucie MADELAINE, Centre Jean Perrin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-A01480-45

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on Training in the A-DIVA scale and its failure prediction score

3
Subscribe