Autologous Micrografts From the Palatal Mucosa for Periodontal Regeneration

November 27, 2023 updated by: Mario Aimetti, University of Turin, Italy

Periodontal Regeneration in Non-contained Intrabony Defects Using Autologous Micrografts From the Palatal Mucosa: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Some research studies have demonstrated that autologous micrografts made out of different oral tissues may enhance tissue regeneration. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a combined approach using an autologous micrograft derived from the palatal mucosa with an alloplastic scaffold for periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects in terms of clinical attachment level gain (primary outcome) and other secondary outcomes (probing pocket depth reduction, radiographic bone fill) compared to a scaffold alone. Moreover, this study aims to compare early wound healing and patient-reported outcome measures between the two groups.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Turin, Italy, 10126
        • Recruiting
        • CIR Dental School
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Patients selected for the study should fulfil the following inclusion criteria:

  • Affected from stage III-IV periodontitis.
  • Completed non-surgical periodontal therapy.
  • FMPS <15% at 3-month re-evaluation.
  • FMBS <15% at 3-month re-evaluation.
  • At least one site with an interproximal intrabony defects and residual PPD ≥ 6 mm at re-evaluation, with a radiographic intrabony component ≥ 3 mm, extending to the lingual/palatal side as assessed by preoperative bone sounding.
  • Intrasurgically, the defect has to present a non-supporting anatomy (1-2 residual walls in its most coronal portion), requiring flap elevation on both buccal and oral side for its accessibility.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Compromised general health which contraindicates the study procedures (ASA III-VI patients).
  • Systemic diseases/medications which could influence the outcome of the therapy (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, non-plaque-induced gingival diseases, antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin and sodium valproate), certain calcium channel-blocking drugs (e.g., nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem, amlodipine, felodipine), immunoregulatory drugs (e.g., cyclosporine), and high-dose oral contraceptives.
  • Current smokers (self-reported), users of chewing tobacco, and drug/alcohol abusers.
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Presence of furcation involvement ≥ II degree (Hamp 1975) at the affected teeth.
  • Very large and wide defects that required the use of membrane.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Autologous micrograft from the palate
Modified papilla preservation technique with a combined approach using a bone substitute soaked with autologous micrografts from the palate.
Minimally invasive flap elevation and debridement of the intrabony defect with micro-curettes. A small punch of connective tissue will be harvested from the palate in the premolar region. Then the graft will be mechanically dissociated using the Rigenera Machine System rotating speed to 80 rpm, in 1.0 ml sterile physiologic solution. After dissociation, the cellular suspension will be passed through a disposable grid with 100 hexagonal blades filtering cells and components of extracellular matrix with a cut-off of 50 um in an average time of 90 s. Finally, part of the suspension containing AMGs will be seeded on the scaffold material and subsequently compacted within the defect. Flaps will be positioned at the pre-surgical level or slightly coronal without any tension.
Active Comparator: Control group
Modified papilla preservation technique with a combined approach using a bone substitute.
Minimally invasive flap elevation and debridement of the intrabony defect with micro-curettes. The defect will be filled with the same bone substitute employed in the test group. Finally, flaps will be positioned at the pre-surgical level or slightly coronal without any tension.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical attachment level change
Time Frame: 12 months
Clinical attachment level will be assessed on the experimental teeth using periodontal probe (PCP 15/11.5, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic bone level change
Time Frame: 12 months
Periapical standardized radiographs will be taken by a clinician masked to the clinical measurements using the paralleling technique and individually customized bite-blocks (RINN XCP Film Holding Instruments, Dentsply, York, USA)
12 months
Probing pocket depth change
Time Frame: 12 months
Probing depth will be assessed on the experimental teeth using periodontal probe (PCP 15/11.5, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA)
12 months
Patient reported outcome measures
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Pain will be self-recorded by the patient using a visual analog scale (from 0 to 10)
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 2, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Rigenera_Turin

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on Rigenera + bone substitute

Subscribe