Transgender Caregivers' and Patients' Representations of Parenthood as Part of a Fertility Preservation Pathway (TransFert)

January 18, 2024 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

This research aims to understand the impact of fertility preservation consultation on transgender patients' projection and how the possibility of preserving gametes influences transgender people's transition paths, parenthood projects and health and health of transgender people through qualitative interviews.

This research will also study the representations of members of medical and reproductive biology teams the possible use of stored gametes, and how these representations influence their clinical practice.

clinical practice. To answer the research question, we plan to include 30 patients who have consulted for fertility preservation at the at the CECOS of the Tenon hospital, located in the 20th arrondissement of Paris, and 20 members of the center's healthcare team.

care team.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Since the 2016 law, transgender people no longer need to provide "irreversible and medical proof of a physical transformation" in order to carry out a sex change at the Civil Registry, which puts an end to systematic sterilization and opens up the possibility of a hormonal-only transition. Yet hormonal treatments can have an impact on the fertility of transgender people, compromising a subsequent project for parenthood.

The Reproductive Biology department at Tenon, where the research will take place, now offers self-conservation of female and male gametes before hormone replacement treatments are introduced, or during a therapeutic window. Fertility preservation in transgender women relies primarily on sperm self-preservation. For transgender men, fertility preservation relies on cryopreservation of mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation.

In addition to assessing the psychic impact of care in order to prevent potential deleterious effects, psycho-sexological consultation offers an opportunity to express the desire for a child, a desire often inhibited for a long time, as well as information on the possibilities of reuse.

When it comes to research around the issue of fertility preservation for transgender people, there is often talk of problems concerning access to this care: the discriminatory practices of certain centers that refuse transgender people, the lack of training in transidentity issues for care teams, etc. The coercive weight of the law seems to be enough to evade the issue by moving it into the realm of legislation. And yet, in our clinical experience, the question of gamete reuse is a subject that merits research to determine the obstacles and levers for both caregivers and patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75020
        • CECOS / service de Biologie de la Reproduction Hôpital Tenon
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

For patient : transgender patients consulting as part of a fertility preservation course For care teams : care teams from the biology and reproductive medicine department

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any transgender person undergoing fertility preservation in the department
  • Any member of the reproductive biology and medicine services team
  • Aged 18 and over, with or without children
  • Informed and having signed consent to participate in the research project

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No social security
  • Persons under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients
Care team

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients surveyed who developed or modified a gamete-use project following the fertility preservation consultation.
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
To understand the impact of the fertility preservation consultation on transgender patients' projection in terms of parenthood.
Up to 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of caregivers who raise the issue of gamete reuse during their consultations.
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
To study the way in which caregivers perceive the possible use of preserved gametes, and how these perceptions influence their clinical practice.
Up to 2 months
number of members of the healthcare team who have changed their practice since the service began accepting transgender patients
Time Frame: Up to 2 months

To study the way in which caregivers perceive the possible use of preserved gametes, and how these perceptions influence their clinical practice.

criteria:

Up to 2 months
Number of patients who have developed a parental project following consultation with the psychologist.
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Up to 2 months
Number of patients who are aware of the law and their rights in terms of gamete preservation and use
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Up to 2 months
Number of patients who have modified the temporality of their transition (medical and/or administrative) because of their preservation path and/or their desire for parenthood.
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Up to 2 months
Number of patients for whom the intention to preserve their gametes is experienced as improving their transition path.
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emilie MOREAU, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP230413
  • 2023-A00509-36 (Other Identifier: IDRCB ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fertility Issues

Subscribe