Global Evaluation of Cholecystectomy Knowledge and Outcomes (GECKO)

January 15, 2024 updated by: University of Edinburgh

Cholecystectomy is amongst the most common surgical operations performed worldwide. Surgical candidates are treated for biliary pathologies, such as biliary colic, cholecystitis and gallstone pancreatitis. In patients who are deemed fit for surgery, cholecystectomy can be performed under three main settings: (1) emergency setting at index admission; (2) elective setting with no previous admissions; or (3) delayed setting with one or more previous gallbladder-related admissions.

The advent of laparoscopy fundamentally evolved biliary surgery and quickly became the "gold standard" approach. Recent multicentre collaborative studies have elucidated that the burden imposed on healthcare systems by laparoscopic cholecystectomies is primarily due to patient readmissions and complications arising from the operation, rather than perioperative mortality burden that was more commonly seen in open surgery. As a result, national and international societies have shifted their focus towards creating a culture of safety around this procedure, with the overarching goal of improving patient satisfaction and reducing hospital costs. The universal establishment of safe cholecystectomy is a complex process that relies not only on the operation itself, but also on various other factors such as promoting adequate training, improving hospital infrastructure, and enhancing perioperative patient care.

There remains a paucity of evidence around the variations of safe provision of laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease internationally, including low- and middle-income countries. To bridge this knowledge gap, the Global Evaluation of Cholecystectomy Knowledge and Outcomes (GECKO) study (GlobalSurg 4) will be an international collaborative effort, delivered by the GlobalSurg network, that will allow contemporaneous data collection on the quality of cholecystectomies using measures covering infrastructure, care processes and outcomes. It will be disseminated via contacts from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Surgery unit, leading emergency general surgeons and specialist organisations.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • University of Edinburgh
        • Contact:
          • Ewen Harrison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients, admitted to hospital within the pre-specified data collection periods, undergoing cholecystectomy as the index operation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: All adult patients (greater than or including 18 years of age).
  • Procedure: Primary cholecystectomy, where this is the main procedure planned.
  • Approach: Open, laparoscopic (standard and single-port), and robotic. Gasless laparoscopic and robotic approaches are inluded. Laparoscopic and robot converted cases are also eligible.
  • Urgency: Elective, delayed and emergency procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Procedure: Patients having a cholecystectomy as a part of another surgical procedure; for example, Whipple's procedure, bariatric, anti-reflux, or transplant operations, should be excluded.
  • Indication: Patients with Mirizzi syndrome should be excluded.
  • Return to theatre: Each patient should only be entered into the study once. Any patient returning to theatre and requiring a cholecystectomy for whatever indication, should not be included.
  • Known gallbladder malignancy: when the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer is established pre-operatively, the patient should be excluded. However, if gallbladder cancer is found unexpectedly during or after cholecystectomy (i.e. on histology), the patient should be included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance to pre-, intra-, and post-operative audit standards
Time Frame: 30-days from surgery

Compliance to audit standards are defined as follows:

  1. Pre-operative: For patients with acute cholecystitis, surgeons may use the Tokyo Guidelines 18.
  2. Intraoperative: The use of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the recommended approach to correctly identify relevant anatomy and minimize the risk of bile duct injuries
  3. Postoperative: 30-day readmission should be <10%.
30-days from surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of provision of cholecystectomy
Time Frame: 30-days of surgery
The quality will be assessed according to the rates of overall complications defined as the presence of Grade I to grade V Clavien-Dindo complication.
30-days of surgery
Adverse events following cholecystectomy (e.g., bile duct injury) and their management.
Time Frame: 30-days of surgery
Occurence of bile duct injury within 30-days of surgery will be defined according to the Strasberg Classification
30-days of surgery
Rates of unsuspected gallbladder cancer.
Time Frame: 1-year from surgery
The rates of gallbladder cancer will be assessed at 1-year from the index surgery once the histology results are available.
1-year from surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gallbladder Cancer

3
Subscribe