Nephroureterectomy With and Without Lymph Node Dissection for Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma

September 3, 2025 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Randomized-Controlled Trial Examining Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes for Nephroureterectomy With and Without Lymph Node Dissection for Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma

The goal of this study is to conduct the first randomized-controlled trial to determine the oncologic efficacy of lymph node dissection in participants with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • To determine oncologic outcomes, specifically 2-year recurrence-free survival
  • To determine other oncologic outcomes including treatment-free, cancer-specific and overall survival
  • To determine time to recurrence and recurrence patterns
  • To determine use of adjuvant therapies
  • To determine perioperative complications

Participants will undergo nephroureterectomy with or without lymph node dissection. Researchers will compare these two groups to determine the oncologic efficacy of performing lymph node dissection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease with complex management. Some participants with clinically negative nodes may still receive a lymph node dissection (LND) with nephroureterectomy, and currently, no randomized controlled trial exists to evaluate the oncologic efficacy of this practice. According to current American Urologic Association guidelines, Nephroureterectomy is the standard of care intervention for high-risk UTUC and low-risk UTUC is endoscopically unresectable. The aim of the present study is to determine the efficacy, specifically 2-year recurrence-free survival, of lymph node dissection at time of nephroureterectomy for participants with UTUC, compared to no lymph node dissection, as well as examine other oncologic outcomes and complication rates

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Mohamed Eltemamy, MD
  • Phone Number: 216-444-5888
  • Email: Eltemam@ccf.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • Recruiting
        • University of Florida Health Science Center
        • Contact:
          • Tarik Benidir, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tarik Benidir, MD
    • Illinois
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62702
        • Recruiting
        • Southern Illinois University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mohammad Mahmoud, MD
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
        • Contact:
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adam Calaway, MD, MPH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults > 18 years
  • Diagnosis of UTUC as determined by upper tract biopsy (either low or high grade)
  • Planned for nephroureterectomy by their urologic surgeon
  • Disease that is ≤cT4, N0M0. Participants must have complete TNM staging prior to surgery. cT disease can be determined by biopsy of the mass (if biopsy was deep enough) or imaging (CT/MRI). cN and cM stage must be determined by preoperative imaging of the chest, abdomen and pelvis.
  • No concomitant muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically enlarged lymph nodes suspicious for metastases which would require lymph node dissection regardless of trial (>cN0)
  • Presence of distant metastases
  • Concomitant muscle invasive bladder cancer
  • The participant is in a reduced general condition or has a life-threatening disease.
  • The participant has a psychiatric disorder that precludes them from understanding the consent process.
  • The patient is pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nephroureterectomy With Lymph Node Dissection
Participants will undergo nephroureterectomy for UTUC and will receive LND.
Participants will undergo standard-of-care nephroureterectomy for UTUC.
Participants will receive lymph node dissection alongside nephroureterectomy for UTUC.
Active Comparator: Nephroureterectomy Without Lymph Node Dissection
Participants will undergo nephroureterectomy for UTUC and will not receive LND.
Participants will undergo standard-of-care nephroureterectomy for UTUC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
Kaplan-Meier will compare recurrence-free survival time between participants who received LND vs participants who did not receive LND.
2 years post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
Kaplan-Meier will compare treatment-free survival time between participants who received LND vs participants who did not receive LND.
2 years post-op
Cancer-specific survival
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
Kaplan-Meier will compare cancer-specific survival time between participants who received LND vs participants who did not receive LND.
2 years post-op
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
Kaplan-Meier will compare the overall survival between participants who received LND vs participants who did not receive LND.
2 years post-op
Time to recurrence
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
Kaplan-Meier will compare the time to disease recurrence between participants who received LND vs participants who did not receive LND.
2 years post-op
Use of adjuvant therapies
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
T-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be applied to determine the rate of adjuvant therapies used between participants who received LND vs participants who did not receive LND.
2 years post-op
Perioperative complications
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
T-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be applied to determine the rate of perioperative complications between participants who received LND vs participants who did not receive LND.
2 years post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed Eltemamy, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Principal Investigator: Adam Calaway, MD, MPH, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Urology Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This will be shared via a redcap database. All of the variables listed in the PRMC protocol and IRB application will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From when the trial starts (receives IRB approval and recruitment is initiated) until 1 year after the final participant finishes 2 year follow-up.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

This will be shared with the following people at UH PI, research coordinator, residents/fellows/other attendings who are included on the IRB at UH.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urothelial Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Nephroureterectomy

Subscribe