- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06365112
Endoscopic Acetabulum Surgery
The Endoscopic Surgical Technique of the Acetabulum: A Minimally Invasive Operative Technique for the Extraperitoneal Fixation of Acetabulum Fractures
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Endoscopically assisted acetabular fracture treatment
Introduction Acetabular fractures are uncommon trauma in Finnish population (1). The trauma mechanism usually in elderly population is fall in same level and in younger population high energy trauma such as motor vehicle accidents and fall from hights (1). Acetabular fractures are classified according the Letournel classification in which the fractures are divided in three main gategories: posterior column, both columns and anterior column (2).
These fractures are further divided into posterior column, posterior wall and posterior wall plus posterior column fractures. These posterior only fractures are usually operated through posterior approach. Both column fractures are further divided into six different types: transverse, transverse plus posterior wall, both column, T-shaped (posterior column and anterior hemitransverse), anterior column plus posterior hemitransverse; anterior wall plus posterior hemitransverse. Anterior approach is used usually to these fractures sometimes combined with posterior approach. The third fracture type is likewise divided into anterior column, anterior wall and anterior wall plus anterior column fractures, which are usually operated using anterior approach. (2)
Operative treatment is the golden standard in displaced high energy acetabulum fractures and technique has traditionally been open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Approach, which has been used to operate the anterior part of the acetabulum fractures, has been modified Stoppa in which the acetabulum is exposed through low midline incision in extraperitoneal region (3).
The problem with this approach is the visualization of the highest proportion of the pelvic brim and usually fractures highest point, because of the anatomical reasons, peritoneum and the arteria and vena femoralis goes nearby and sometimes prevent making the approach, reduction and plating of the fracture safely. Some patients have also post operative problems with the incision, they have pain in the anterior part of the pelvis. Also the dissection and sometimes detachment of the rectus abdominis muscles may cause serious problems post operatively.
Because of the problems with the approach, we have developed a novel technique in which we make the visibility with endoscopic technique. Extraperitoneal endoscopy is used commonly in the hernia reparation surgery nowadays (TEP). The acetabular fracture surgery is done in the same area as the hernia surgery so the approach itself is not a new method but the idea that fracture can be treated solely through endoroscopy is.
There are few published case reports similar as our method. One of which is from China and the technique was that they made endoscopic approacs and treated the fracture with 3D-printed model of the patients pelvis and then bended the plate matching the patients pelvis (4). The report is quite scarse and it lacks long term results altogether.
The other case report is from Germany and is otherwise similar as our technique, but they used additional ilioinguinal lateral approach to reduce the fracture and to introduce the plate. They state, that this method will be a standard procedure in future trauma management (5).
The reason for this study is thus to develop a novel method to operate anterior acetabular fractures endoscopically in cadavers and to test it in prospective matter in patients.
Aims of the study
- Develop a safe endoscopic surgical method to treat anterior acetabular fractures
- Test the method in patients prospectively
- To find out, if this novel method saves operation theatre time, blood loss, post operative patient satisfaction and VAS
Materials and methods The first part of the study includes the endoscopically assisted acetabular operation development in Tampere surgical education centre. The surgical method will be published.
The second part of the study is done in the Tampere University Hospital orthopaedics and traumatology ward. It consists of three (3) patients operated with this new method. In this part of the study, the patients will not be randomized, but we include all consecutive eligible patients. There will be at least one publication about this study part.
The third part of the study is done in randomized controlled study design in which the other group will be operated with the new endoscopically assisted method and the other group with the nowadays standard modified Stoppa approach. This study consist of ten (10) patients. There will be at least one publication about this study part.
Inclusion criteria are: age over 18 and anterior acetabular fracture, which can be treated with endoscopic method. Exclusion criteria are: age lower than 18 and previous lower abdomen operation
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Piia Suomalainen
- Phone Number: +3583311611
- Email: piia.suomalainen@pirha.fi
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tampere, Finland, 33521
- Recruiting
- Tampere University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Piia Suomalainen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Acetabulum fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
- <18years
- Previous lower abdominal operation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Endoscopic assisted acetabulum fractrure treatment
|
Endoscopy
|
|
Active Comparator: Open reduction
|
Endoscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Operation time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Number of patients with major complications
Time Frame: At three months
|
At three months
|
|
Number of patients with minor complications
Time Frame: At three months
|
At three months
|
|
Patient satisfaction using EQ5D
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R21154
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acetabulum Fracture
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephCompleted
-
Zimmer BiometCompletedAcetabulum Fracture | Pelvic Ring FractureItaly
-
Peifu TangCompletedFracture of AcetabulumChina
-
Fondation Hôpital Saint-JosephCompletedTransverse Fracture of AcetabulumFrance
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalCompleted
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaCompletedAcetabulum FracturesUnited States
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterCompletedFemur Fracture | Unstable Pelvic Ring Fracture | Unstable Acetabulum FractureUnited States
-
Chittagong Medical CollegeCompletedPosterior Wall of Acetabulum FractureBangladesh
-
University of CincinnatiFoundation for Orthopedic TraumaCompletedFracture of Posterior Wall of AcetabulumUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...TerminatedIntra-Articular Fractures | Acetabulum | Fracture FixationUnited States
Clinical Trials on Endoscopy assisted
-
Technical University of MunichRotkreuzklinikum München gGmbH; Klinikum Freising; Klinikum Landshut-Achdorf; Städtisches... and other collaboratorsCompletedEndoscopic Diagnosis in EsophagusGermany
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesUnknownCongenital Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingArtificial Intelligence Assistance in Endoscopy Recovery | AI ValidationHong Kong
-
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruitingRadiology | Imaging | AI (Artificial Intelligence) | Digestive DiseasesChina
-
The University of Hong KongRecruitingArtificial Intelligence | Gastric NeoplasmHong Kong
-
Sohag UniversityActive, not recruitingMaxillofacial Injuries | Maxillofacial Trauma | Subcondylar Process of Mandible Closed Fracture | Orbital Floor (Blow-Out) Closed Fracture | Frontal Sinus FractureEgypt
-
Chuncheon Sacred Heart HospitalRecruiting
-
Ningbo No. 1 HospitalCompletedEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection | Tracheal Intubation | Video Laryngoscope | Endoscopy-AssistedChina
-
VA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center; VA Salt Lake City Health Care...CompletedColorectal NeoplasmsUnited States
-
Jin HuNot yet recruitingClarify the Therapeutic Differences Between Robot Assisted Endoscopic Clearance and Traditional Puncture and External Drainag