- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06515106
Antibody-mediated LGI1 Encephalitis: Symptoms, Biomarkers, and Mechanisms of the Chronic Phase of the Disease
The encephalitis mediated by antibodies against Leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 protein (anti-LGI1 encephalitis) predominantly affects men (M:F, 6:4) and mostly older than 60 years. The disease has two distinct clinical phases: The acute phase in which the majority of patients develop severe short-term memory deficits (unable to remember events or experiences that occurred a few minutes earlier). This memory impairment can be preceded or accompanied by one or more of the following: hyponatremia (60% of patients), a highly distinctive type of seizures called facio-brachial dystonic seizures (~40% of patients), along with confusion, irritability and other types of focal seizures or less frequently, generalized seizures. In addition, many patients at this stage have symptoms of REM sleep behavior disorder. In this stage, the CSF may show pleocytosis or mild increase of proteins, the EEG is usually abnormal, and in ~60% of the patients the MRI shows typical increased FLAIR signal in medial temporal lobes (11). There is a clinical sub-phenotype (~13% of patients) in which the disease presents as a rapidly progressive cognitive decline without the indicated FLAIR MRI changes. About 70% of patients improve rapidly with corticosteroids and immunotherapy (eg, intravenous immunoglobulins and/or plasma exchange), but the improvement is often partial. After the acute phase, there is a chronic or residual phase which represents the interval from improvement of initial symptoms until the disease is considered no longer active and the remaining symptoms are thought to be irreversible. This chronic phase may take several months (it has been less well studied), and is characterized by the absence of CSF pleocytosis and inflammatory MRI changes (albeit this may show residual hippocampal atrophy), and very low or undetectable titers of serum antibodies. Most patients are unable to return to their job or previous activities due to residual (irreversible) memory or cognitive deficits accompanied by signs of moderate brain atrophy. In addition, we and others have shown that about 27-35% of patients have relapsing symptoms after improving from the acute phase (. Although acute symptomatic seizures (facio-brachial dystonic and others) occur in ~90% of patients during the acute phase of the disease, less than 10% of patients develop chronic epilepsy often associated with hippocampal sclerosis. Therefore, the prevailing concept on this disease suggests a syndrome and clinical course in which the acute phase shows rapid, albeit partial, response to immunotherapy, and the symptoms of the chronic phase represent a burnout or irreversible process, in which the disease is no longer active, and the potential improvement of remaining symptoms is uncertain.
Here investigators postulate that a better knowledge of this stage will improve treatment decisions and outcome.
In Aim 1, the post-acute stage will be clinically characterized.
In Aim 2, the impact of cognitive rehabilitation will be assessed.
In Aim 3, a mouse model of anti-LGI1 encephalitis will be used to determine the underlying mechanisms and treatment of the postacute stage.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Josep Dalmau, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: 34 93 227 1738
- Email: jdalmau@clinic.cat
Study Locations
-
-
Cataluña
-
Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain, 08036
- Recruiting
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
-
Contact:
- Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 93 227 1738
- Email: jdalmau@clinic.cat
-
Contact:
- Victor Patricio, MS
- Phone Number: +34 93 227 1738
- Email: vpatricio@recerca.clinic.cat
-
Principal Investigator:
- Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Mar Guasp, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Eugenia Martínez-Hernández, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Víctor Patricio, MS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Amaia Muñoz, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Laia Prades, MS
-
Principal Investigator:
- Lorena Rami, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Thais Armanguè, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Elianet Fonseca, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with Antibody-mediated LGI-1 encephalitis in the post-acute stage of the disease;
- Patients has been discharged from hospital (acute phase).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to obtain informed consent;
- Inability to travel to the center.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Antibody-mediated LGI1 encephalitis patients
Participants of a prospective cohort in post-acute phase of the Antibody-mediated NMDA Receptor Encephalitis that will received a behavioral treatment.
|
Behavioral: Remote cognitive rehabilitation program Remote cognitive rehabilitation program will be performed through an online validated platform (Guttmann NeuroPersonalTrainer: https://gnpt.es/)
run by the psychologists team.
This is a Sanitary Product with CE certification (Sanitary Product RPS/430/2014; International Patent [PCT/ES2008/00677]) and here will be used within its approved indications.
The rehabilitation program will increase in difficulty and decrease in frequency during the first year of follow-up (V1-V3).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Age
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Age measured in years
|
12 months
|
|
Gender
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Male or female
|
12 months
|
|
Handedness
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Right- or Left-handed
|
12 months
|
|
General medical history
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Description of the most important issues compiled in the general medical history of the participant
|
12 months
|
|
Allergies
Time Frame: 12 months
|
List of allergies of each participant
|
12 months
|
|
Symptoms related to anti-LGI1 encephalitis
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Detailed description of symptoms experienced before, during and after the post-acute phase of anti-LGI1 encephalitis.
|
12 months
|
|
Treatments
Time Frame: 12 months
|
All treatments in which the participant is being involved.
|
12 months
|
|
Functional status
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Functional status according to Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Modified Rankin Scale: - Range: from 0 points (no symptoms) to 6 points (dead). |
12 months
|
|
Intelligence Quotient
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Estimated through General Ability Index (GAI; from Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale - IV (WAIS-IV). This index is obtained through Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI). Range of GAI: from 40 to 160. Higher is better. Range of VCI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better. Range of PRI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Verbal working memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Verbal Working Memory: Working Memory Index (WMI) from WAIS-IV. - Range of WMI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Phonological loop
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by Forward order span of Digit span subtest from WAIS-IV. - Range: from 0 to 9 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Visual working memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Visual Working Memory: Spatial location subtest from Weschler Memory Scale - IV (WMS-IV). - Range of Spatial Location subtest: from 0 to 32. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Verbal learning
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC - Total learning: range: from 0 to 80. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Proactive interference verbal memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC). - Interference list: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Short-term verbal memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC). - Short-term memory free recall: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Long-term verbal memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC): - Long-term memory free recall: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Verbal recognition memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC). - Word-list Recognition: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Verbal discrimination memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC) Discrimination index of word-list: False positives + omissions of recognition between 44 total words to recognize. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Verbal retention memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI) - Retention index: percentatge of Long-term memory free recall between Short-term memory free recall. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Immediate visual memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Immediate visual memory: range: from 0 to 36. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Delayed visual memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Delayed visual memory: range: from 0 to 12. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Visual retention memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Retention index: percentatge of Long-term memory free recall between the Higher punctuation at Trial 2 or 3. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Visual recognition memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Figure Recognition: range: from 0 to 6. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Visual discrimination memory
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Discrimination index: figure recognized minus false positives. Range: from -6 to 6. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Processing speed
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Symbol Search subtest (WAIS-IV) - Total (correct answers less incorrect answers): from 0 to 60 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
TMT-A
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A): - Time in seconds: from 0 to infinity. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Naming
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT) - Total correct: from 0 to 60 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Naming with cues
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT) - Total correct with phonemic cue: from 0 to 60 |
12 months
|
|
Latency in naming
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT) - Time to complete test in seconds |
12 months
|
|
Semantic fluency
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of name of animals recalled in 1 minute: range: from 0 to infinity. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Phonemic fluency
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of words started by letter "M" recalled in 1 minute: - Range: from 0 to infinity. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Visuospatial skills
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number location subtest of the Visual-Object Spatial and Perceptual battery. - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Symbolic gesture right hand - order
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Symbolic gesture right hand - order subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Symbolic gesture left hand - order
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Symbolic gesture left hand - order subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Symbolic gesture right hand - imitation
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Symbolic gesture right hand - imitation subtest from Test Barcelona - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Symbolic gesture left hand - imitation
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Symbolic gesture left hand - imitation subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Bilateral ideomotor praxis - imitation
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Bilateral ideomotor praxis imitation subtest from Test Barcelona - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Stroop test - word subtest
Time Frame: 12 months
|
- Words: words read in 45 seconds Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Stroop test - color subtest
Time Frame: 12 months
|
- Colour: colours distinguished in 45 seconds. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Stroop test - word-color subtest
Time Frame: 12 months
|
- Word-colour: colours distinguished in 45 seconds. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased. |
12 months
|
|
Prensence of psychiatric symptoms or disorders
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of participants with psychiatric symptoms/disorders following DSM-IV-TR guidelines (psychotic symptoms, symptoms of depression, symptoms of mania, global functioning).
|
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Total study time
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Total sleep time: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Total sleep time
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Total sleep time: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Sleep efficiency
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Sleep efficiency: based on total study time and total sleep time |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Time to sleep onset
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time to sleep onset: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N1
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage N1: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N2
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage N2: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N3
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage N3: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Time in stage R
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage R: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N1
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of N1: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N2
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of N2: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N3
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of N3: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - First epoch of REM
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of REM: minutes |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - REM/NREM time ratio
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - REM/NREM time ratio |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Number of arousals
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Number of arousals (total) |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Arousal Index
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Arousal Index |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Confusional arousals
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Confusional arousals: Yes or No |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Direct transition from N3 to W
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Direct transition from N3 to W: yes or no |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Delta arousals
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Delta arousals: yes, no or unknown |
12 months
|
|
Sleep microstructure - Wake after sleep
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Wake after sleep: hour |
12 months
|
|
Adherence to cognitive treatment - 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Percentage of sessions performed in 6 months out of 48 (sessions performed out of 48 x 100)
|
6 months
|
|
Adherence to cognitive treatment - 9 months
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Percentage of sessions performed in 9 months (sessions performed out of 54 x 100)
|
9 months
|
|
Adherence to cognitive treatment - 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Percentage of sessions performed in 9 months out of 60 (sessions performed out of 60 x 100)
|
12 months
|
|
Cardiovagal evaluation. (Composite autonomic scoring scale)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Continuous electrocardiogram heart rate changes during deep breathing and postural changes (beats per minute).Composite autonomic scoring scale minimun 0, maximum 3, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
12 months
|
|
Valsava ratio
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Continuous electrocardiogram heart rate changes during Valsalva manoeuvre (ratio).
|
12 months
|
|
Sympathetic evaluation (Composite autonomic scoring scale)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Beat-to-beat blood pressure changes to isometric exercise, Valsalva manoeuvre and postural changes, (mmHg).
Composite autonomic scoring scale minimun 0, maximum 4, higher scores mean a worse outcome
|
12 months
|
|
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (Compass-31)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Self-scoring Compass 31 autonomic assessment.
Minimum 0, maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
12 months
|
|
Electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Needle recording electrode will be inserted into different muscles (orbicularis oris, extensor indicis propius, tibialis anterior).Presence of abnormal discharges will be recorded (0 none to 4 maximum).
|
12 months
|
|
Brainstem reflex
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Trigeminal blink reflex, mediated by trigemino-facial ponto-medullary -circuits will be assessed.
Surface recording electrodes will be attached over the orbicularis oculi in both sides with active electrode over the middle part of the lower eyelid and the reference at the lateral cantus of the eye .
Stimulating electrodes will be placed over the supraorbital nerve.
Ipsilateral (R1, R2) and contralateral responses (R2c) latencies measured in ms will be analyzed
|
12 months
|
|
MRI
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will be conducted on a 3 Tesla Prisma scanner using a 32-channel head coil. Scanning takes ~50 min including 3D T1-weighted in sagittal plane; T2*axial EPI; axial diffusion weighted EPI; 3D sagittal FLAIR; resting state functional MRI and glutamate and H2O univoxel spectroscopy in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. There is no contrast used for the MRI scans Outcome for MRI is normal or abnormal. Investigators will review all MRI sequences and determine if the MRI is abnormal and then describe the abnormality or abnormalities seen. |
12 months
|
|
EEG: normalcy
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). - Normalcy: yes or no. |
12 months
|
|
EEG: time awake
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Time awake: percentage |
12 months
|
|
EEG: time in drowsiness
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Time in drowsiness: percentage |
12 months
|
|
EEG: time asleep
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Time asleep: percentage |
12 months
|
|
EEG: epileptiform activity
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Epileptiform activity: yes or no |
12 months
|
|
EEG: seizures
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Seizures: yes or no |
12 months
|
|
EEG: slowing
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - EEG slowing: yes or no |
12 months
|
|
EEG: Changes with Intermittent Light Stimulation
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Changes with Intermittent Light Stimulation: yes or no |
12 months
|
|
EEG: Changes with hyperventilation
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Changes with hyperventilation: yes or no |
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
LGI-1 antibodies
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Determined with brain tissue immunohistochemistry and cell - based assays
|
12 months
|
|
HLA genotyping
Time Frame: 12 months
|
performed by standard techniques based on DNA - PCR and polymorphism identification by reverse hybridization with specific probes and fluorescence labelling of hybridized fragments (PCR - SSOP) (Immucor GTI Diagnostics Inc.Waukesha USA) in combination with genomic DNA sequencing by Sanger methodology (PCRSBT).
|
12 months
|
|
Immune/inflammatory signaling-target gene expression pathways
Time Frame: 12 months
|
RNA/NanoString analysis of targeted gene expression related to activation/function of B cells, T cells, microglia, and other interleukin/ chemokine signaling.
Whole blood/CSF will be collected using PAXgene® Blood RNA tubes (Qiagen) shipped to the centers.
Total RNA will be extracted using PAXgene® Blood RNA Kit (Qiagen).
RNA samples are quantified using Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and RNA integrity is determined with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).
Expression levels of 44 genes related to immunological pathways and cytokines (Annex,Table) will be measured with the nCounter® Digital Analyzer (NanoString), as reported (Armangue et al., Mol Genet Metab 2017;122:134-9).
Twenty healthy participants will serve as controls (single evaluation).
|
12 months
|
|
NfL levels
Time Frame: 12 months
|
determined in serum and CSF using the SiMoA Quanterix technique, as reported (Guasp et al., Neurology 2022;98:e1489 - 98).
Age-and sex-matched healthy participants from previous studies will serve as controls.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD, Hospital Clínic
- Principal Investigator: Lorena Rami, PhD, Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Granerod J, Ambrose HE, Davies NW, Clewley JP, Walsh AL, Morgan D, Cunningham R, Zuckerman M, Mutton KJ, Solomon T, Ward KN, Lunn MP, Irani SR, Vincent A, Brown DW, Crowcroft NS; UK Health Protection Agency (HPA) Aetiology of Encephalitis Study Group. Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;10(12):835-44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70222-X. Epub 2010 Oct 15. Erratum In: Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;11(2):79.
- Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangue T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, Honig LS, Benseler SM, Kawachi I, Martinez-Hernandez E, Aguilar E, Gresa-Arribas N, Ryan-Florance N, Torrents A, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Graus F, Dalmau J. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
- Guasp M, Rosa-Justicia M, Munoz-Lopetegi A, Martinez-Hernandez E, Armangue T, Sugranyes G, Stein H, Borras R, Prades L, Arino H, Planaguma J, De-La-Serna E, Escudero D, Llufriu S, Sanchez-Valle R, Santamaria J, Compte A, Castro-Fornieles J, Dalmau J; Spanish anti-NMDAR Encephalitis Study Group. Clinical characterisation of patients in the post-acute stage of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a prospective cohort study and comparison with patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):899-910. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00299-X.
- Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):840-851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1708712. No abstract available.
- Dalmau J, Geis C, Graus F. Autoantibodies to Synaptic Receptors and Neuronal Cell Surface Proteins in Autoimmune Diseases of the Central Nervous System. Physiol Rev. 2017 Apr;97(2):839-887. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00010.2016.
- Hughes EG, Peng X, Gleichman AJ, Lai M, Zhou L, Tsou R, Parsons TD, Lynch DR, Dalmau J, Balice-Gordon RJ. Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 28;30(17):5866-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0167-10.2010.
- Planaguma J, Leypoldt F, Mannara F, Gutierrez-Cuesta J, Martin-Garcia E, Aguilar E, Titulaer MJ, Petit-Pedrol M, Jain A, Balice-Gordon R, Lakadamyali M, Graus F, Maldonado R, Dalmau J. Human N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antibodies alter memory and behaviour in mice. Brain. 2015 Jan;138(Pt 1):94-109. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu310. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
- Petit-Pedrol M, Sell J, Planaguma J, Mannara F, Radosevic M, Haselmann H, Ceanga M, Sabater L, Spatola M, Soto D, Gasull X, Dalmau J, Geis C. LGI1 antibodies alter Kv1.1 and AMPA receptors changing synaptic excitability, plasticity and memory. Brain. 2018 Nov 1;141(11):3144-3159. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy253.
- van Sonderen A, Petit-Pedrol M, Dalmau J, Titulaer MJ. The value of LGI1, Caspr2 and voltage-gated potassium channel antibodies in encephalitis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 May;13(5):290-301. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.43. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
- Gable MS, Sheriff H, Dalmau J, Tilley DH, Glaser CA. The frequency of autoimmune N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;54(7):899-904. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1038. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
- Armangue T, Spatola M, Vlagea A, Mattozzi S, Carceles-Cordon M, Martinez-Heras E, Llufriu S, Muchart J, Erro ME, Abraira L, Moris G, Monros-Gimenez L, Corral-Corral I, Montejo C, Toledo M, Bataller L, Secondi G, Arino H, Martinez-Hernandez E, Juan M, Marcos MA, Alsina L, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Graus F, Dalmau J; Spanish Herpes Simplex Encephalitis Study Group. Frequency, symptoms, risk factors, and outcomes of autoimmune encephalitis after herpes simplex encephalitis: a prospective observational study and retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Sep;17(9):760-772. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30244-8. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
- Lai M, Huijbers MG, Lancaster E, Graus F, Bataller L, Balice-Gordon R, Cowell JK, Dalmau J. Investigation of LGI1 as the antigen in limbic encephalitis previously attributed to potassium channels: a case series. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Aug;9(8):776-85. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70137-X. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
- Irani SR, Alexander S, Waters P, Kleopa KA, Pettingill P, Zuliani L, Peles E, Buckley C, Lang B, Vincent A. Antibodies to Kv1 potassium channel-complex proteins leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 protein and contactin-associated protein-2 in limbic encephalitis, Morvan's syndrome and acquired neuromyotonia. Brain. 2010 Sep;133(9):2734-48. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq213. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
- Munoz-Sanchez G, Planaguma J, Naranjo L, Couso R, Sabater L, Guasp M, Martinez-Hernandez E, Graus F, Dalmau J, Ruiz-Garcia R. The diagnosis of anti-LGI1 encephalitis varies with the type of immunodetection assay and sample examined. Front Immunol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1069368. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1069368. eCollection 2022.
- van Sonderen A, Thijs RD, Coenders EC, Jiskoot LC, Sanchez E, de Bruijn MA, van Coevorden-Hameete MH, Wirtz PW, Schreurs MW, Sillevis Smitt PA, Titulaer MJ. Anti-LGI1 encephalitis: Clinical syndrome and long-term follow-up. Neurology. 2016 Oct 4;87(14):1449-1456. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003173. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
- Arino H, Armangue T, Petit-Pedrol M, Sabater L, Martinez-Hernandez E, Hara M, Lancaster E, Saiz A, Dalmau J, Graus F. Anti-LGI1-associated cognitive impairment: Presentation and long-term outcome. Neurology. 2016 Aug 23;87(8):759-65. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003009. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
- Iranzo A, Graus F, Clover L, Morera J, Bruna J, Vilar C, Martinez-Rodriguez JE, Vincent A, Santamaria J. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and potassium channel antibody-associated limbic encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2006 Jan;59(1):178-81. doi: 10.1002/ana.20693.
- de Bruijn MAAM, van Sonderen A, van Coevorden-Hameete MH, Bastiaansen AEM, Schreurs MWJ, Rouhl RPW, van Donselaar CA, Majoie MHJM, Neuteboom RF, Sillevis Smitt PAE, Thijs RD, Titulaer MJ. Evaluation of seizure treatment in anti-LGI1, anti-NMDAR, and anti-GABABR encephalitis. Neurology. 2019 May 7;92(19):e2185-e2196. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007475. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
- Ramberger M, Berretta A, Tan JMM, Sun B, Michael S, Yeo T, Theorell J, Bashford-Rogers R, Paneva S, O'Dowd V, Dedi N, Topia S, Griffin R, Ramirez-Franco J, El Far O, Baulac S, Leite MI, Sen A, Jeans A, McMillan D, Marshall D, Anthony D, Lightwood D, Waters P, Irani SR. Distinctive binding properties of human monoclonal LGI1 autoantibodies determine pathogenic mechanisms. Brain. 2020 Jun 1;143(6):1731-1745. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa104.
- Ohkawa T, Fukata Y, Yamasaki M, Miyazaki T, Yokoi N, Takashima H, Watanabe M, Watanabe O, Fukata M. Autoantibodies to epilepsy-related LGI1 in limbic encephalitis neutralize LGI1-ADAM22 interaction and reduce synaptic AMPA receptors. J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 13;33(46):18161-74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3506-13.2013.
- Irani SR, Stagg CJ, Schott JM, Rosenthal CR, Schneider SA, Pettingill P, Pettingill R, Waters P, Thomas A, Voets NL, Cardoso MJ, Cash DM, Manning EN, Lang B, Smith SJ, Vincent A, Johnson MR. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures: the influence of immunotherapy on seizure control and prevention of cognitive impairment in a broadening phenotype. Brain. 2013 Oct;136(Pt 10):3151-62. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt212. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
- Diaz Baquero AA, Franco-Martin MA, Parra Vidales E, Toribio-Guzman JM, Bueno-Aguado Y, Martinez Abad F, Perea Bartolome MV, Asl AM, van der Roest HG. The Effectiveness of GRADIOR: A Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Program for People with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia. Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial After 4 and 12 Months of Treatment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(2):711-727. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215350.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Infections
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Central Nervous System Viral Diseases
- Central Nervous System Infections
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Nervous System Neoplasms
- Paraneoplastic Syndromes, Nervous System
- Paraneoplastic Syndromes
- Neuroinflammatory Diseases
- Encephalitis
- Limbic Encephalitis
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI23/00858
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Limbic Encephalitis With LGI1 Antibodies
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingAutoimmune Encephalitis Associated With Anti-CAPR2 AntibodiesFrance
-
Hospices Civils de LyonUnknown
-
Hospices Civils de LyonUnknownEncephalitis | LGI1 Antibody Associated Encephalitis
-
Nantes University HospitalCR2TI - UMR1064 (INSERM)Not yet recruitingVasculitis Associated With Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic AntibodiesFrance
-
DatabeanOctapharmaTerminatedRenal Transplant Recipients With Anti-HLA AntibodiesUnited States
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingGAD-receptor Antibodies-associated EncephalitisFrance
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingCASPR2-Antibody | NMDAR Autoimmune Encephalitis | LGI1 Antibody Associated Encephalitis | GFAP | IgLON5 | GAD65France
-
Hoffmann-La RocheChugai PharmaceuticalRecruitingNMDAR Autoimmune Encephalitis | LGI1 Autoimmune EncephalitisUnited States, Israel, Ghana, Japan, Spain, Taiwan, China, Argentina, Netherlands, Czechia, Singapore, Denmark, Brazil, Italy, Austria, France, Poland, South Korea
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandWithdrawnAdult Patients With Suspected Meningitis and/or EncephalitisSwitzerland
-
Emory UniversityBaxter Healthcare CorporationTerminatedSeizure Disorder | Epilepsy, Partial | Epilepsy, Cryptogenic | Autoimmune Diseases, Nervous System | Limbic EncephalitisUnited States
Clinical Trials on Remote cognitive rehabilitation program
-
Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca BiomédicaHospital Sant Joan de DeuRecruitingAnti-NMDA Receptor EncephalitisSpain
-
Stanford UniversityThrasher Research FundCompletedStem Cell Transplantation | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Pediatric CancerUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedMild Cognitive ImpairmentKorea, Republic of
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandClementel; Maurice Gantchoula; LADAPT; APFUnknown
-
Seoul National University HospitalUniversity of SeoulNot yet recruitingCongenital Heart Disease in Children | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) | Complex Congenital Heart DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompleted
-
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, KoreaHanyang University; National IT Industry Promotion Agency, Republic of KoreaCompleted
-
Università degli Studi di FerraraRecruiting
-
Pusan National University Yangsan HospitalWoorisoftCompletedCognitive Impairment | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentKorea, Republic of
-
Sheba Medical CenterCompletedCognitive Rehabilitation | Physical RehabilitationIsrael