A Study on the Effectiveness Evaluation in Stroke Patients Using Lower Limb Assistive Walking Devices

A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Controlled, Non Inferiority Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the Walker Assisted Device (Fubon Robot) in Lower Limb Motor Function for Stroke Patients

The main purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the MI-R1 walking machine in lower limb motor function training for stroke patients.

The main question is to answer:

  1. Are patients using MI-R1 lower limb walking machine training more effective than those using traditional rehabilitation training?
  2. Is the MI-R1 lower limb walking machine safe?

Participants will:

  1. The experimental group received MI-R1 lower limb walking machine assisted training, while the control group received traditional rehabilitation training.
  2. Perform functional testing on the 0th, 14th, and 28th day of training.
  3. Observe whether there is any discomfort or safety during the rehabilitation training process.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • Zhejiang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with stroke through CT or MRI, and only accompanied by hemiplegia on one side, with first-time onset or previous episodes without residual neurological dysfunction;
  • Vital signs stable, neurological symptoms no longer aggravate after 48 hours, no severe cognitive impairment or aphasia, and cooperate with training;
  • Modified Ashworth score for lower limb ≤ level 2, standing balance function level ≥1;
  • Voluntarily participating in this trial, understanding and cooperating with the entire trial process, and signing a written informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bone, joint, muscle disease, or lower limb disabilities (such as severe osteoporosis, fractures, spinal instability, severely limited joint range of motion, severe limb muscle contractures, deformities, etc.) or diseases that affect balance and walking;
  • Stroke caused by cerebellar brainstem injury and cortical injury;
  • Patients with severe primary diseases such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and hematopoietic systems, as well as critically ill and psychiatric patients;
  • Other contraindications or complications that may affect walking training treatment;
  • Patients with local skin damage or pressure ulcers in the lower limbs;
  • Patients with peripheral nerve injury in the lower limbs;
  • Inappropriate body shape for robots (height<150cm or>190cm, or weight>85 kg);
  • Planned pregnancy or pregnant and lactating women;
  • Participants in other clinical trials within the past 3 months;
  • Severe cognitive impairment;
  • Known refusal or inability to comply with protocol requirements for any reason (including planned clinical visits and examinations);
  • The researchers believe that it should not participate in this clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: treatment group

Patients received MI-R1 lower limb walking machine assisted training device based on their condition for the following training content:

  1. Center of gravity transfer training;
  2. Marking time and walking training;
  3. Transfer training; 15 minutes each time, once a day, at least 5 times a week.
The training is conducted under partial weight support training conditions, performing passive movements on the lower limbs through motor drive, improving the joint activity of the patient's hip and knee joints, and achieving sitting, standing, and walking functions.
Active Comparator: control group

Patients received walking rehabilitation training under the guidance of therapists based on their condition for the following training content:

  1. Center of gravity transfer training;
  2. Single leg weight-bearing training;
  3. Marking time training assisted by balance bar;
  4. Walking training assisted by balance bar; 15 minutes each time, once a day, at least 5 times a week.
Each patient undergoes training under the guidance of a rehabilitation therapist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl Meyer Lower Limb Balance Assessment Scale Score on the 28th day
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Lower limb function assessment
through study completion, an average of one and a half year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl Meyer Lower Limb Balance Assessment Scale Score on the 0th and 14th day
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Lower limb function assessment
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Holden Walking Function Classification
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Pedestrian function assessment on the 0th,14th and 28th day
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Modified Barthel Index
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Assessment of activities of daily living ability on the 0th,14th and 28th day
through study completion, an average of one and a half year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vital signs - temperature
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Measure the patient's body temperature on the 0th, 14th, and 28th days of training
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Vital signs - heart rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Measure the patient's heart rate on the 0th, 14th, and 28th days of training
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Vital signs - respiratory rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Measure the patient's respiratory rate on the 0th, 14th, and 28th days of training
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Vital signs - blood pressure
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Measure the patient's blood pressure on the 0th, 14th, and 28th days of training
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Vital signs - pulse
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Measure the patient's pulse on the 0th, 14th, and 28th days of training
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by "Criteria for determining adverse events"
through study completion, an average of one and a half year
Device defects checklist
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of one and a half year
The risks to health and safety that may arise from the normal use of medical devices, including quality and malfunctions
through study completion, an average of one and a half year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Qinglong Gao, Zhejiang Fubon Technology Co., Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe