- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06849141
The Effect of the Role Performance Strengthening Program on the Adaptive Performance and Competence of Nurses
The Effect of the Role Performance Strengthening Program Based on the Roy Adaptation Model on the Adaptive Performance and Competence of Nurses Working in Pandemic Units
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Konyaalti
-
Antalya, Konyaalti, Turkey, 07070
- Akdeniz University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Working as a nurse in pandemic clinics, pandemic intensive care units or the orange area of the emergency room,
- Having a competency score average below 26 as a result of measurements made with the Nursing Competency Scale,
- Accepting to participate in the research in writing and verbally,
- Accepting to participate in all sessions of the Role Performance Strenghthening Program. -
Exclusion Criteria:
• It has been determined that the person is continuing a therapy program to cope with the problems he/she experiences due to working during the pandemic. -
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Nurses who were implemented the "Role Performance Strenghthening Program (RPSP)"
Within the scope of the doctoral thesis study, the "Role Performance Enhancement Program (RPGP), an individual psychoeducation program produced within the framework of cognitive behavioral approach elements and based on the Roy Adaptation Model, was applied to 10 nurses.
Each nurse was worked with individually.
Sessions were conducted online or face-to-face, at the time and place preferred by the nurses, once a week.
The program consisted of 6 sessions.
Each session lasted 45-90 minutes on average.
However, the duration of each session could be extended according to the needs of the nurses.
After the application, post-action measurements were made one week later and follow-up measurements were made four weeks later.
|
This intervention was developed by the researcher within the scope of her doctoral dissertation.
The intervention is an individual psychoeducation program; it was written and structured within the framework of cognitive behavioral therapy, based on the Roy Adaptation Model.
The intervention was structured on the idea of empowering nurses working in pandemic units.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Scoring below 26 on the "Nurse Competence Scale"
Time Frame: All quantitative and qualitative data of the first phase of the research were collected in approximately 8 weeks.
|
Quantitative data collection forms were first given to 54 nurses by the researcher and collected. After the scores obtained from these forms were collected and averaged, 42 nurses who received less than 26 points from the Nurse Competence Scale were selected. Getting less than 25 points from the Nurse Competence Scale is an indicator of low level of competence. Nurses' competence levels were measured with a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 points. Scores below 25 indicate "low competence"; scores between 25 and 49 indicate "slightly good competence"; scores between 50 and 75 indicate "good competence"; and scores above 75 indicate "very good competence". |
All quantitative and qualitative data of the first phase of the research were collected in approximately 8 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: İlhan Günbayı, Prof. Dr., Akdeniz University Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Sciences
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- MacKay MM, Powers K, Jordan K. The COVid-19 pandemic through the eyes of pediatric nurses: A qualitative study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;68:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.09.015. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
- Yilmaz A, Seren Intepeler S. Opinions of emergency nurses in Turkey on their work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with their health: A qualitative study. Heliyon. 2023 Nov 25;9(12):e22716. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22716. eCollection 2023 Dec.
- Yiğitol B, Büyükmumcu S. Covid-19 Korkusu, Kişilik Özellikleri, İş Performansı ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki Yordayıcı İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 2021; 17(Pandemi Özel Sayısı): 3414-3447.
- Senesac P, Roy C. Callista Roy's Adaptation Model. In: Smith, MC, Gullett, DL. eds. Nursing Theories & Nursing Practice. 5thed. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 2019, Chapter 10, p: 149-164.
- Savsar A, Damar HT, Aktaş FÖ. Operating Room Nurses' Metaphorical Perceptions of Coronavirus Disease 2019, Quarantine, and Mask Concepts: A Qualitative Study. J Nursology, 2023; 26(3), 167-174.
- Roy SC. The Roy Adaptation Model (3rd Ed.) New Jersey: Pearson Education & Upper Saddle River; 2009(b).
- Roy SC. Elements of the Roy Adaptation Model. In: Roy SC, ed. The Roy Adaptation Model. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2009(a).
- Roy C. Spiritualty based on the Roy adaptation model for use in practice, teaching and research. Aquichan, 2018; 18(4): 393-394.
- Roy C. Research based on the Roy adaptation model: last 25 years. Nurs Sci Q. 2011 Oct;24(4):312-20. doi: 10.1177/0894318411419218.
- Roy C. Extending the Roy adaptation model to meet changing global needs. Nurs Sci Q. 2011 Oct;24(4):345-51. doi: 10.1177/0894318411419210.
- Roy C. A theorist envisions the future and speaks to nursing administrators. Nurs Adm Q. 2000 Winter;24(2):1-12. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200001000-00004.
- Roy C, Zhan L. Sister Callista Roy's Adaptation Model and Its Applications. (Chapter 17). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. 2. Edition. F.A. Davis Company; 2006.
- Pulakos ED, Schmitt N, Dorsey DW, Arad S, Borman WC, Hedge JW. Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Hum perform, 2002; 15(4): 299-323.
- Pulakos ED, Dorsey DW, White SS. Adaptability in the workplace: Selecting an adaptive workforce. In Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2006.
- Mensinger JL, Brom H, Havens DS, Costello A, D'Annunzio C, Durning JD, Bradley PK, Copel L, Maldonado L, Smeltzer S, Yost J, Kaufmann P. Psychological responses of hospital-based nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A cross-sectional study. Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Feb;63:151517. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151517. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
- Menard AD, Soucie K, Ralph J, Chang YY, Morassutti O, Foulon A, Jones M, Desjardins L, Freeman L. One-year follow-up of hospital nurses' work experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2023 Jul;79(7):2502-2513. doi: 10.1111/jan.15599. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
- Masters K. Roy Adaptation Model: Sister Callista Roy. In: Nursing Theories: A Framework for Professional Practice. 2nd ed. Burlington: Jones & Barlett Learning; 2015.
- Hannon-Engel SL. Knowledge development: the roy adaptation model and bulimia nervosa. Nurs Sci Q. 2008 Apr;21(2):126-32. doi: 10.1177/0894318408315015.
- Gunbayi I. Rigor in qualitative research. JAQMER, 2024; 3(2), 1-7.
- Gunbayi I. Knowledge-constitutive interests and social paradigms in guiding mixed methods research (MMR). JOMES, 2020(b); (1), 44-56.
- Gunbayi I. Action Research as a Mixed Methods Research: Definition, Philosophy, Types, Process, Political and Ethical Issues and Pros and Cons. JOMES, 2020(a); 2: 16-25.
- Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 1981; 29(2), 75-91.
- Fawcett J. Using the Roy adaptation model to guide research and/or practice: construction of Conceptual-Theoretical-Empirical systems of knowledge. Aquichan, 2009; 9(3), 297-306.
- Tsukuda M, Kayano T, Ito Y. Experiences of COVID-19-Related Stigma: A Qualitative Study on Nurses Caring for Patients With COVID-19. J Nurs Res. 2022 Dec 1;30(6):e241. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000528.
- Takase M, Yamamoto M, Sato Y. The factors related to self-other agreement/disagreement in nursing competence assessment: Comparative and correlational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Apr;80:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
- Takase M, Teraoka S. Development of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale. Nurs Health Sci. 2011 Dec;13(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00631.x. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
- Roy C. Adversity and theory: the broad picture. Nurs Sci Q. 2008 Apr;21(2):138-9. doi: 10.1177/0894318408316407. No abstract available.
- Pulakos ED, Arad S, Donovan MA, Plamondon KE. Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Aug;85(4):612-24. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612.
- Littzen-Brown C, Dolan H, Norton A, Bethel C, May J, Rainbow J. Unbearable suffering while working as a nurse during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Dec;5:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100127. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
- Fukada M. Nursing Competency: Definition, Structure and Development. Yonago Acta Med. 2018 Mar 28;61(1):1-7. doi: 10.33160/yam.2018.03.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.
- Fawcett J. Thoughts About the Metaparadigm of Nursing: Contemporary Status and Recommendations for Evolution. Nurs Sci Q. 2023 Jul;36(3):303-305. doi: 10.1177/08943184231169770.
- Fawcett J. The metaparadigm of nursing: present status and future refinements. Image J Nurs Sch. 1984 Summer;16(3):84-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1984.tb01393.x. No abstract available.
- Fawcett J. More Thoughts About the Evolution of the Metaparadigm of Nursing: Addition of Culture as Another Metaparadigm Concept and Definitions of All the Concepts. Nurs Sci Q. 2024 Apr;37(2):183-184. doi: 10.1177/08943184231224409.
- Fawcett J. Contemporary nursing knowledge analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. Fa Davis comp. USA; 2006.
- Fawcett J, Desanto-Madeya S. Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. FA Davis; 2012.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- KAEK-751
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.