Estimating the Prevalence of GAstrocnemius Muscle REtraction in a Population Suffering From Plantar aPOneurositis and Describing the Effects of Lengthening (REGAPOP)

July 1, 2025 updated by: Clinique Saint Charles

The gastrocnemius muscles, which form the upper part of the calf, can suffer from retraction, a common but often under-diagnosed condition, which can be a risk factor for plantar fasciitis. Retraction can be treated medically, by stretching, or surgically, by lengthening the muscles. Gastrocnemius retraction is difficult to measure, but tests such as the Ankle Dorsiflexion Index (ADI) provide a more accurate assessment.

Knowing the prevalence of this retraction in patients suffering from plantar fasciitis would enable us to improve diagnostic criteria and better target treatments. Surgical lengthening of the gastrocnemius, particularly by tenotomy, is effective in cases of chronic plantar fasciitis, even without apparent muscle retraction.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 70 or under
  • Patient suffering from unilateral plantar fasciitis that has progressed for more than 6 months and is recalcitrant to medical treatment
  • Collection of express, oral consent
  • Available for follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neuropathic pain
  • History of fracture of the lower limb, surgery on the lower limb, inflammatory rheumatism of the lower limb, injury to the Achilles tendon
  • Patient with another painful orthopedic lesion of the legs/feet
  • Patient with surgically treated plantar fasciitis in the year prior to inclusion
  • Persons unable to give consent
  • Not affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Persons under court protection
  • Participant in another study with an ongoing exclusion period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ankle Dorsiflexion Index (ADI) measurement
Ankle Dorsiflexion Index (ADI) measurement at D0 and W8
Ankle Dorsiflexion Index (ADI) measurement at D0 and W8

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of gastrocnemius muscle retraction in patients with plantar fasciitis
Time Frame: At Day 0
retraction of the gastrocnemius muscles will be defined by an ADI of less than 13° measured by a digital inclinometer
At Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between ADI measurement and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)
Time Frame: At Day 0
The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is used to measure the impact of foot pain on patients' quality of life. It consists of 16 questions. The raw scores of the scales are converted into a metric scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates the maximum intensity of suffering or limitation.
At Day 0
correlation between ADI measurement and pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: At Day 0

The VAS consists of a straight line where one extreme represents the total absence of pain and the other extreme, the most intense pain possible. Patients are asked to mark on this line the level of pain they feel at any given moment. Pain intensity is then measured according to the distance between the start of the scale (0) and the point where the patient placed his mark:

  • 0 cm (or the start of the scale): No pain
  • 10 cm (or the end of the scale): Maximum imaginable pain
At Day 0
Evolution of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: between Day 0 and Week 8
The VAS consists of a straight line where one extreme represents the total absence of pain and the other extreme, the most intense pain possible. Patients are asked to mark on this line the level of pain they feel at any given moment. Pain intensity is then measured according to the distance between the start of the scale (0) and the point where the patient placed his mark: - 0 cm (or the start of the scale): No pain - 10 cm (or the end of the scale): Maximum imaginable pain
between Day 0 and Week 8
Evolution of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: between Day 0 and Week 16
The VAS consists of a straight line where one extreme represents the total absence of pain and the other extreme, the most intense pain possible. Patients are asked to mark on this line the level of pain they feel at any given moment. Pain intensity is then measured according to the distance between the start of the scale (0) and the point where the patient placed his mark: - 0 cm (or the start of the scale): No pain - 10 cm (or the end of the scale): Maximum imaginable pain
between Day 0 and Week 16
Evolution of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: between Day0 and Week 24
The VAS consists of a straight line where one extreme represents the total absence of pain and the other extreme, the most intense pain possible. Patients are asked to mark on this line the level of pain they feel at any given moment. Pain intensity is then measured according to the distance between the start of the scale (0) and the point where the patient placed his mark: - 0 cm (or the start of the scale): No pain - 10 cm (or the end of the scale): Maximum imaginable pain
between Day0 and Week 24
Evolution of Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)
Time Frame: between Day 0 and Week 8
The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is used to measure the impact of foot pain on patients' quality of life. It consists of 16 questions. The raw scores of the scales are converted into a metric scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates the maximum intensity of suffering or limitation.
between Day 0 and Week 8
Evolution of Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)
Time Frame: between Day 0 and Week 16
The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is used to measure the impact of foot pain on patients' quality of life. It consists of 16 questions. The raw scores of the scales are converted into a metric scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates the maximum intensity of suffering or limitation.
between Day 0 and Week 16
Evolution of Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)
Time Frame: between Day 0 and Week 24
The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is used to measure the impact of foot pain on patients' quality of life. It consists of 16 questions. The raw scores of the scales are converted into a metric scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates the maximum intensity of suffering or limitation.
between Day 0 and Week 24
Correlation between surgical success and body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: At Day 0
Surgical success is based on variation of pain (mesured with Visual Analogic Scale)
At Day 0
Correlation between surgical success and age of patient
Time Frame: At Day 0
Surgical success is based on variation of pain (mesured with Visual Analogic Scale)
At Day 0
Correlation between surgical success and tobacco consumption
Time Frame: At Day 0
Surgical success is based on variation of pain (mesured with Visual Analogic Scale)
At Day 0
Correlation between surgical success and location of fasciitis
Time Frame: At Day 0
Surgical success is based on variation of pain (mesured with Visual Analogic Scale) Location of fasciitis: proximal or central
At Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REGAPOP
  • 2025-A00798-41 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fasciitis

Clinical Trials on Ankle Dorsiflexion Index (ADI) measurement

Subscribe