EARLY-SARDS: Early AlveolaR Lung biologY Underling Sepsis-Associated ARDS (EARLY-SARDS)

Characterization of Early Biological and Mechanical Profiles in Sepsis-Associated ARDS for Studying Compartmentalization (Serial Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Plasma Biomarkers) to Identify Inflammatory and Hybrid Subphenotypes

Sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a major cause of respiratory failure and mortality in critically ill patients. Although only a proportion of patients with sepsis develop ARDS, early identification of those at highest risk remains a major unmet clinical need. Current prediction relies largely on clinical deterioration and oxygenation impairment, which often occur when lung injury has already developed. Increasing evidence suggests that biological responses to sepsis are compartmentalized between the systemic circulation and the alveolar space, while early abnormalities in respiratory mechanics and ventilatory efficiency may provide complementary information on evolving lung injury. However, no prospective study has integrated serial systemic and alveolar biomarkers with bedside respiratory physiology during the earliest phase of sepsis-associated respiratory failure.

EARLY-SARDS is a prospective observational cohort study designed to characterize the early biological and physiological trajectories of invasively ventilated patients with sepsis or septic shock. Serial bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and plasma samples, together with standardized measurements of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, will be collected during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The primary objective is to develop an integrated biological-physiological model capable of predicting ARDS development and subsequent peak ARDS severity. Secondary objectives include characterizing biological compartmentalization, identifying integrated biological-physiological subphenotypes, and evaluating their association with clinically relevant outcomes, including duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days, need for extracorporeal respiratory support, ICU length of stay, and mortality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to sepsis is a biologically heterogeneous syndrome that reflects multiple interacting mechanisms of lung injury rather than a single pathological process. Current clinical definitions rely on physiological manifestations of established lung injury and therefore provide limited insight into the underlying biological processes responsible for disease initiation and progression.

Experimental and translational studies indicate that the earliest phase of sepsis-associated lung injury is characterized by dynamic interactions between inflammatory activation, epithelial injury, endothelial dysfunction, disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier, and alterations in pulmonary permeability. These processes evolve rapidly during the first days after sepsis onset and may precede the clinical diagnosis of ARDS by several hours or days. Longitudinal characterization is therefore essential to understand the temporal evolution of lung injury.

Because the primary site of injury is the alveolar compartment, circulating biomarkers incompletely reflect the biological events occurring within the lung. Inflammatory mediators, epithelial injury markers, and endothelial activation frequently demonstrate compartmentalization between bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and plasma, suggesting that simultaneous assessment of both compartments may provide a more comprehensive characterization of early lung injury than either compartment alone.

Respiratory physiology represents a complementary dimension of ARDS pathophysiology. Parameters including respiratory system compliance, driving pressure, plateau pressure, ventilatory ratio, and gas exchange describe the functional consequences of biological injury and the mechanical environment to which the lung is exposed during invasive mechanical ventilation. Mechanical stress and biological injury are closely interconnected and likely contribute jointly to disease progression.

By combining repeated assessment of alveolar biology, systemic host response, and respiratory physiology during the earliest phase of sepsis-associated respiratory failure, this study is designed to characterize the temporal evolution of lung injury and provide an integrated description of the biological and physiological mechanisms underlying progression to ARDS.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

145

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08035

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants are adult ICU patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock who require invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis. These patients represent a high-risk population for sepsis-associated lung injury and ARDS, with dynamic biological and physiological changes occurring during the earliest phase of critical illness. The study follows participants for the first 96 hours after sepsis diagnosis to capture these early trajectories.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Sepsis or septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria.
  • Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis.
  • Written informed consent provided by the participant or a legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy.
  • Previous lung transplantation.
  • Contraindication to bronchoscopy or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).Inability to complete at least two BAL procedures during the 96-hour study period.
  • Expected death within 24 hours or limitation of life-sustaining treatment at enrollment.
  • Written informed consent not obtained.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sepsis or Septic shock requiring mechanical ventilation
Adult ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock requiring invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours from sepsis diagnosis will be consecutively enrolled and followed for 96 hours after sepsis diagnosis.

At baseline (T0), blood samples and standardized respiratory physiological measurements, including gas exchange and ventilatory mechanics, will be obtained from all participants.

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) will be performed only in invasively mechanically ventilated patients meeting predefined safety criteria.

T1 will occur 24 hours after T0 in patients already intubated or at the time of endotracheal intubation if this occurs within 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis.

T2 will be performed 96 hours after sepsis diagnosis and at least 24 hours after the previous assessment.

At each study point plasma sampling and physiological measurements will be repeated, while BAL will be repeated only when predefined safety criteria are fulfilled. All clinical management will remain at the discretion of the treating ICU team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early lung injury trajectory within 96 hours of sepsis onset
Time Frame: Baseline to 96 hours

Early lung injury trajectory, assessed as an ordinal composite endpoint integrating:

  1. occurrence of ARDS according to the Berlin Definition,
  2. time from sepsis diagnosis to ARDS onset,
  3. the highest Berlin ARDS severity stage (mild, moderate, or severe) reached during the 96-hour observation period.

This endpoint will serve as the outcome for development and internal validation of an integrated biological-physiological prediction model combining alveolar and systemic biomarkers with respiratory physiological variables.

Baseline to 96 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alveolar-systemic biological compartmentalization
Time Frame: Baseline to 96 hours
Alveolar-to-plasma biomarker gradients, concordance between paired bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and plasma biomarkers, and identification of compartmentalized biological profiles associated with early lung injury.
Baseline to 96 hours
Incremental predictive performance of integrated biological-physiological models
Time Frame: Baseline to 96 hours
Improvement in model discrimination, calibration, reclassification, and clinical utility after incorporation of alveolar biomarkers and respiratory physiological variables into conventional clinical and plasma-based prediction models.
Baseline to 96 hours
Reproducibility and external validation of biological-physiological models
Time Frame: Once study is completed, avarage 2 years
Assessment of biomarker distributions, alveolar-systemic gradients, biological-physiological subphenotype assignment, and prediction model performance across the prospective multicentre derivation cohort, including Vall d'Hebron and Uppsala University, with external validation in an independent retrospective Amsterdam UMC cohort.
Once study is completed, avarage 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Martínez Pla, MD, SODIR (Shock, Disfunció Orgànica i Ressuscitació)
  • Study Director: Luis Chiscano Camon, MD, PhD, SODIR (Shock, Disfunció Orgànica i Ressuscitació)
  • Study Chair: Luis Morales Quinteros, MD, PhD, SODIR (Shock, Disfunció Orgànica i Ressuscitació)
  • Study Director: Juan Carlos Ruiz Rodriguez, MD, PhD, SODIR (Shock, Disfunció Orgànica i Ressuscitació)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share IPD because of data sensitivity and institutional data protection requirements

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe