BTX-A and Mirror Therapy for Chronic Stroke Spasticity

The Combined Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A and Mirror Therapy in the Management of Chronic-Phase Upper Extremity Spasticity After Ischemic Stroke: A Double-Blind, Controlled Study

Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, particularly affecting the upper extremities and thus negatively impacting patients' activities of daily living and quality of life. Upper extremity spasticity, characterized by increased muscle tone and tendon reflexes, leads to functional limitations. While Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) is widely used to manage spasticity and can temporarily alleviate symptoms, it does not directly support neuroplasticity and often requires repeated injections.

Mirror therapy (MT) has emerged as a promising rehabilitation approach with the potential to stimulate motor recovery and cortical reorganization. It is hypothesized that combining MT with BTX-A injections may more effectively reduce spasticity and improve upper extremity function.

In this study, a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, prospective design was employed to investigate the effects of adding MT to BTX-A treatment on spasticity and upper extremity motor function in stroke patients. A total of 30 patients, who received BTX-A injections, were divided into two groups: an experimental group receiving mirror therapy and a control group receiving sham therapy (using transparent glass). All patients also underwent a standardized conventional rehabilitation program, and the BTX-A injection protocol was kept consistent. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by comparing pre-injection measurements with those at six months post-injection, using the Brunnstrom Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer Scale, and a hand dynamometer. The findings are expected to shed light on the potential benefits of simultaneous MT and BTX-A administration, including reducing injection frequency, and to guide more comprehensive approaches in the rehabilitation of chronic stroke.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Istanbul
      • Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34000
        • Liv hospital Vadistanbul

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of unilateral ischemic stroke
  • Under the routine medical follow-up of the same clinician who plans upper extremity BTX treatment based on standard medical indications
  • At least 3 months post-stroke
  • Signed informed consent form
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score >24
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment score <55
  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of 1-4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior BTX-A or other injections administered to the upper extremity Severe cognitive impairment or any mental disorder preventing effective communication
  • Concurrent enrollment in another experimental treatment program
  • Visual or motor deficits that would prevent the application of mirror therapy
  • History of multiple strokes
  • Presence of neuromuscular pathology in the unaffected extremity
  • Stroke due to a non-ischemic cause

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: BTX-A and MİRROR THERAPY
Participants were asked to sit in a chair and place both forearms on an exercise table with their elbows flexed at 90 degrees. To administer mirror therapy, the direct view of both the healthy and the hemiplegic hand and wrist was blocked using a partition method. A mirror was then placed between the two forearms, ensuring that the mirror image of the healthy-side wrist overlapped with the position of the hemiplegic-side wrist. By observing the healthy hand's movements through the mirror during the exercises, a visual movement illusion was created for the hemiplegic hand.
Botulinum toxin type A was administered via intramuscular injections into the spastic upper limb muscles based on clinical evaluation. Injection sites and dosages were individualized according to the distribution and severity of spasticity. All injections were performed prior to the rehabilitation interventions.
Mirror therapy was performed with participants seated and both forearms placed on a table. A mirror was positioned between the limbs to create a visual illusion of movement of the affected limb by observing the movements of the unaffected limb.
Active Comparator: BTX-A + Sham Mirror Therapy
In the sham group, however, a transparent glass was used instead of a mirror, and participants were asked to watch the wrist movements of the paralyzed side through the glass, providing visual feedback without creating an illusion. The sham procedure was applied for the same duration using the transparent glass
Botulinum toxin type A was administered via intramuscular injections into the spastic upper limb muscles based on clinical evaluation. Injection sites and dosages were individualized according to the distribution and severity of spasticity. All injections were performed prior to the rehabilitation interventions.
Sham mirror therapy was performed using a transparent glass panel instead of a mirror, allowing visual feedback without inducing a mirror illusion. Session frequency and duration were identical to those of the mirror therapy group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FUGL MAYER SCORE
Time Frame: 6 MONTH
The Fugl-Meyer Motor Section focuses on evaluating the motor functions of the upper and lower extremities in individuals who have had a stroke. The tests in this section are scored based on fundamental parameters such as muscle activity, synergy patterns, joint movement control, and coordination. The total motor score commonly reaches 66 points (although there are versions with different point ranges). A higher Fugl-Meyer Motor Section score reflects better motor function in the individual.
6 MONTH

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASHWORTH SCALE
Time Frame: 6 MONTH
The Ashworth Scale is a clinical measurement tool used to objectively evaluate the level of spasticity. The scale is scored from 0 to 4 (including 1+). The higher the score, the greater the resistance to passive movement (indicating more pronounced spasticity)
6 MONTH
BRUNNSTROM LEVEL
Time Frame: 6 MONTH
Brunnstrom evaluates the upper extremity and the hand separately in six fundamental stages. The upper extremity staging assesses synergy and movement capabilities of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. The hand staging reflects the ability to grasp, release, and perform fine motor skills. As the stages advance over time (for example, progressing from Stage 3 to Stage 4), the effectiveness of rehabilitation and the patient's recovery process are monitored.
6 MONTH

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

First Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Botulinum toxin type A (Botox®, Allergan)

Subscribe