Botulinum Toxin Versus Active Strength Training in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis (BooST)

December 30, 2014 updated by: Aki Vainionpaa, Seinajoki Central Hospital

Botulinum Toxin Versus Active Strength Training in Treatment of the Lateral Epicondylitis - A Single-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy, feasibility and cost effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A injections to active nine weeks strength training and stretching program in the treatment of the chronic lateral epicondylitis.

The main hypothesis is that the botulinum toxin type A injections may enable more rapid pain relief while strength training may provide better functional results and less relapses during the follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION:

Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) is a frequent repetitive stress injury, affecting the common extensor muscles at the lateral humeral epicondyle. Lateral epicondylitis has a well-known spontaneous healing tendency. Still the prevalence of the chronic lateral epicondylitis is 1.4% in working populations causing significant occupational disability and financial burden.

Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of different treatment modalities for lateral epicondylitis present conflicting results. There are no consistent guidelines for management of the prolonged lateral epicondylitis. Progressive strengthening and stretching exercises as well as botulinum toxin type A injections have been suggested to be effective in treatment of chronic cases. However, there are only a few studies comparing different treatment modalities and botulinum toxin treatment have not been included in any of these.

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy, feasibility and cost effectiveness of the botulinum toxin type A injections to active nine weeks strength training and stretching program in the treatment of the chronic lateral epicondylitis.

The main hypothesis is that the botulinum toxin type A injections may enable more rapid pain relief while strength training may provide better functional results and less relapses during the follow-up.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

A sample size of 120 participants with an equal drop-out rate of 15 % per group was determined in advance to detect a clinically significant 30 percentage points difference in outcome measures between the treatment groups with the minimum success rate of 65 % at the statistical significance level of 0.05 and power of 80 %.

During the recruitment process all patient newly referred to Department of PM&R outpatient clinics in the Seinäjoki Central Hospital due to elbow pain are evaluated by the study investigators. Every eligible patient with written informed consent is recruited. A computerised random number generator is used to draw up an allocation schedule. Patients are allocated in treatment groups via opaque sealed envelopes marked according to the random schedule.

Measurements and training instructions are performed by five trained physical therapists. In addition to detailed personal training instructions given by physical therapist, illustrated instructions as well as instruction video will be provided for patients in the training group. Physical therapists instructing patients do not perform any measurements to enable blinding of assessor. Measurement devices are calibrated regularly according to the manufacturers' recommendations and quality assurance measurements with test weights are performed on regular basis.

The principal statistical analysis will be done on an intention-to-treat basis. Repeated measures of ANCOVA and Cox Proportional Hazard Regression are planned to be used as primary methods. If there will be relapses, more advanced longitudinal models such as Generalised Estimating Equations and Random Coefficient Analysis will be used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seinäjoki, Finland, 60220
        • Department of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, Seinäjoki Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pain at the lateral side of the elbow over 3 months
  • local tenderness on palpation over the lateral epicondyle
  • positive Mill's sign
  • lateral elbow pain progression on resisted wrist and/or middle finger extension
  • involved in working life

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bilateral symptoms or simultaneous medial epicondylitis
  • verified or suspected cervical radiculopathy or affected limb neuropathy
  • congenital or acquired deformities of the elbow
  • previous surgery of the elbow
  • infection, dislocation, tendon ruptures, or fractures in the area
  • systemic musculoskeletal or neurological disorders, incl. rheumatic diseases and fibromyalgia
  • allergy, antibodies or other contraindications for botulinum toxin
  • severe depression, chronic pain syndrome or somatisation disorder
  • ongoing retirement process
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • current participation in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active strength training and stretching
Training duration 9 weeks, intensified every 3 weeks in supervision of physiotherapist. Training program includes progressive, slow, repetitive wrist and forearm stretching, eccentric muscle strengthening, occupational exercises and upper limb neural mobilization training.
Other Names:
  • Eccentric strength training
Active Comparator: Botulinum toxin type A injections
Two injections of 10-60 units of botulinum toxin type A. Injections are administered with ENMG assisted technique at the baseline and after 13 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Botox®, Allergan
  • NDC 0023-1145-01

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain, 100 mm visual analogue scale, change from baseline
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Grip strength (pain free and maximal), hydraulic hand dynamometer, change from baseline
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Experienced disability, 100 mm visual analogue scale, change from baseline
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Isometric wrist extension and flexion strength, digital hanging scale with rigid bench frame, change from baseline
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Treatment adverse effects
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Economic evaluation of interventions, direct and indirect costs
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Days in sick leave
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Experienced forearm pain and disability, The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
General improvement, 7-point Likert scale
Time Frame: 0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aki Vainionpää, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, Seinäjoki Central Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tennis Elbow

Clinical Trials on Active strength training and stretching

3
Subscribe