Chinese Adaptive Randomised Pneumonia Trial With Respiratory Failure (CARP-RF)

February 5, 2026 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital
  1. Background Severe pneumonia with respiratory failure carries a high mortality rate. Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits for interventions such as Trendelenburg Position and certain herbal formulations used within an integrative treatment framework. However, robust evidence from large-scale trials is lacking. This study utilizes an innovative adaptive platform trial design embedded within a continuous cohort to efficiently evaluate the efficacy and safety of these adjunctive interventions combined with standard care, with the inherent flexibility to incorporate future promising therapies.
  2. Objectives Primary Objective: To evaluate whether adjunctive treatment with either Trendelenburg Position or Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formulation, compared to standard care alone, reduces all-cause mortality at 28 days in patients with severe pneumonia and respiratory failure.

    Secondary Objectives: To assess the effects on clinical outcomes including incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score trajectory, and oxygenation. To evaluate the safety profile of the interventions.

  3. Study Design CARP-RF is a Chinese adaptive, randomised trial enrolling patients with pneumonia and respiratory failure. A continuously enrolled master cohort of eligible patients will be established. Within this cohort, eligible consenting participants will be centrally randomized in an unbalanced ratio of (1.5:1:1) to one of three parallel groups.
  4. Participant Population Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU, diagnosed with severe pneumonia per IDSA/ATS criteria (requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or meeting other major/minor criteria), under invasive mechanical ventilation and sedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ≤ -1).

    Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy, terminal illness, significant pulmonary fibrosis or lung cancer, known/suspected intracranial hypertension, increased intraocular pressure or recent eye surgery, and severe refractory hemodynamic instability.

  5. Interventions All participants receive guideline-directed standard care for severe pneumonia. Control Group: Standard care only. Intervention Group 1: Standard care plus Trendelenburg Position at -10° for ≥12 hours daily until sedation is discontinued and consciousness is recovered (RASS 0).

    Intervention Group 2 (TCM): Standard care plus a complementary TCM strategy prescribed by a licensed TCM practitioner. This includes the use of a tailored herbal formulation (Monarch:Trichosanthes 60g, Rhubarb 15g; Minister: Gypsum 30g, Bitter Apricot Seed 10g, Descurainia Seed 30g, Verbena 60g; Assistant: Glehnia 30g, Adenophora 30g, Astragalus 30g, Ophiopogon 15g, Schisandra 6g; Guide: Licorice 10g). One dose twice daily via oral/enteral route for 7 days.

  6. Outcome Measures Primary Outcome: All-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization. Key Secondary Outcomes: VAP incidence; Ventilator-free days at 28 days; duration of invasive mechanical ventilation; ICU and hospital length of stay; change in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio; change in SOFA score.
  7. Sample Size Approximately 1500 participants will be enrolled from multiple tertiary hospitals in China, accounting for consent rates, eligibility within the cohort, and a 5% attrition rate. The sample provides 80% power (alpha=0.05, two-sided) to detect an absolute mortality reduction from 30% to 20%.
  8. Randomization, Blinding, and Consent Randomization is performed centrally via an Interactive Web Response System (IWRS), stratified by site and baseline SOFA score. The trial is open-label for caregivers and participants. Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to treatment allocation. A two-stage consent process is used: broad consent for cohort data collection, followed by specific consent for the randomized intervention only for those allocated to an intervention group.
  9. Data and Safety Monitoring An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will periodically review unblinded safety and efficacy data. Serious adverse events will be monitored and reported according to regulatory requirements. The DSMB may recommend protocol modifications, including early stopping for efficacy/futility or incorporation of new interventions into the adaptive platform.
  10. Statistical Analysis The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Given the pragmatic design, a Compiler Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis will supplement the primary analysis to estimate the effect among participants who adhere to the protocol. Pre-specified subgroup analyses will be conducted.
  11. Ethical Considerations The protocol will be approved by the Institutional Review Board of the leading center and all participating sites. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1500

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU, diagnosed with severe pneumonia per IDSA/ATS criteria (requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or meeting other major/minor criteria), under invasive mechanical ventilation and sedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ≤ -1).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, terminal illness
  • Significant pulmonary fibrosis or lung cancer
  • Known/suspected intracranial hypertension
  • Increased intraocular pressure or recent eye surgery
  • Spinal injury
  • Severe refractory hemodynamic instability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Receiving standard care alone
Active Comparator: Trendelenburg Position Group
Trendelenburg Position: Standard care plus maintenance in the Trendelenburg position at -10° for ≥12 hours daily, continuing until sedation is discontinued and the patient regains consciousness (RASS 0).
Trendelenburg Position: Standard care plus Trendelenburg Position at -10° for ≥12 hours daily until sedation is discontinued and consciousness is recovered (RASS 0).
Active Comparator: Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulation
Traditional Chinese Medicine: Standard care plus a complementary TCM strategy prescribed by a licensed TCM practitioner. This includes the use of a tailored herbal formulation (Monarch:Trichosanthes 60g, Rhubarb 15g; Minister: Gypsum 30g, Bitter Apricot Seed 10g, Descurainia Seed 30g, Verbena 60g; Assistant: Glehnia 30g, Adenophora 30g, Astragalus 30g, Ophiopogon 15g, Schisandra 6g; Guide: Licorice 10g) One dose twice daily via oral/enteral route for 7 days.
Traditional Chinese Medicine: Standard care plus a complementary TCM strategy prescribed by a licensed TCM practitioner. This includes the use of a tailored herbal formulation (Monarch:Trichosanthes 60g, Rhubarb 15g; Minister: Gypsum 30g, Bitter Apricot Seed 10g, Descurainia Seed 30g, Verbena 60g; Assistant: Glehnia 30g, Adenophora 30g, Astragalus 30g, Ophiopogon 15g, Schisandra 6g; Guide: Licorice 10g) One dose twice daily via oral/enteral route for 7 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day mortality rate
Time Frame: 28day
28-day mortality rate
28day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
Time Frame: 28days
Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
28days
Ventilator-free days (VFDs) within day 28
Time Frame: 28days
Ventilator-free days (VFDs) within day 28
28days
Duration of mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive), days
Time Frame: 28days
Duration of mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive), days
28days
Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, days
Time Frame: 28days
Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, days
28days
Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score
Time Frame: 28days

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a validated tool used to quantify the degree of organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. It assesses six organ systems, each scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (most severe), with a total possible score of 0 to 24. A higher score indicates more severe organ failure.

The components are:

  1. Respiratory System: Based on the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (mmHg).
  2. Coagulation: Based on platelet count (×10³/µL).
  3. Liver: Based on bilirubin level (mg/dL or µmol/L).
  4. Cardiovascular System: Based on mean arterial pressure (MAP) or the dose of required vasopressor/inotrope support.
  5. Central Nervous System: Based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score.
  6. Renal System: Based on creatinine level (mg/dL or µmol/L) or urine output.
28days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025ZD01903003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Pneumonia With Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Trendelenburg Position

Subscribe