Cerebellar Research in Ultrasound Stimulation (CERBERUS)

March 31, 2026 updated by: Myles Mc Laughlin, KU Leuven

Experiment 1: Modulation of Physiological Tremor in Healthy Volunteers Thirty healthy volunteers will undergo TUS targeting the dentate nucleus in a randomized, double-blinded crossover design. Tremor amplitude, induced by a 15 g weight, will be measured using an accelerometer, and EEG will assess neural oscillations and cerebello-thalamo-cortical connectivity.

Stimulation will include short-term (1 minute on/off for 12 minutes) and long-term (30 minutes) protocols, as well as closed-loop TUS for phase-specific effects. This experiment aims to optimize stimulation parameters and explore the dentate nucleus's role in tremor generation.

Experiment 2: Tremor Modulation in Essential Tremor Patients Thirty ET patients will receive TUS targeting the dentate nucleus with optimized parameters from Experiment 1 in a randomized crossover design. The best protocol from previous experiment will be tested here. Tremor amplitude and EEG will be recorded to assess short- and long-term effects of TUS on pathological tremor.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Experiment 1: Modulation of Physiological Tremor in Healthy Volunteers This is a randomized, double-blinded, crossover study involving 30 healthy volunteers. Healthy volunteers will be recruited from campus with a flyer and using social media platforms. Each participant will undergo two conditions: on-target transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (TUS) to the dentate nucleus and off-target (sham) stimulation. Initial screening will be performed via phone, after which an informed consent will be signed. The full experiment will consist of four separate visit days, of which only the first one will take place at the UZ Leuven department of Radiology. Visit days 2-4 will entirely be performed at the KU Leuven Brainshub facility in gebouw De Nayer.

  • Visit 1: Imaging On the first visit, participants will undergo MRI scans to obtain structural (T1-weighted) and Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) MRI images. These scans will help reconstruct individual head models to estimate skull characteristics and optimize the TUS target engagement. Using the MRI data, simulations will be performed to calculate the optimal position, shape, size, and pressure of the ultrasound beam. This ensures precise targeting of the dentate nucleus on an individual level during subsequent stimulation sessions.
  • Visit 2: Immediate effects on Tremor Modulation and Phase Entrainment During this visit, participants will perform a task to induce physiological tremor (e.g., holding a weight on their finger). Tremor amplitude will be measured using an accelerometer. TUS will be applied in two conditions: on-target stimulation to the dentate nucleus and off-target sham stimulation. The stimulation will follow a short-term protocol (1 minute on, 1 minute off, repeated for 12 minutes). EEG will be recorded to assess changes in neural oscillations and phase entrainment in the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network. This visit aims to evaluate the immediate effects of TUS on tremor modulation and neural activity.
  • Visit 3: Prolonged effects on Tremor Modulation This visit will evaluate the long-term effects of TUS on tremor modulation. The stimulation protocol will be extended to 30 minutes of sonication to observe whether prolonged stimulation results in stronger or sustained tremor reduction. As in Visit 2, accelerometer data will be collected to measure tremor amplitude, and EEG will be recorded to monitor changes in brain activity over the extended stimulation period. The goal is to assess the durability of the effects and refine the optimal stimulation duration.
  • Visit 4: Closed-loop Stimulation for Tremor Suppression On the fourth visit, a closed-loop stimulation protocol will be tested. This involves synchronizing the TUS delivery to either the peak or trough of the tremor oscillation to determine whether phase-specific stimulation enhances tremor modulation. Real-time tremor data will be collected using an accelerometer, and EEG will be used to track neural responses. This visit aims to explore whether closed-loop TUS can provide more precise control over tremor amplitude compared to standard on/off stimulation.

Experiment 2: Tremor Modulation in Essential Tremor Patients Building on the results from Experiment 1, 30 ET patients will participate in a similar crossover design. Patients will be recruited by a neurologist collaborating on this project. The optimized TUS parameters from Experiment 1 will be used to target the dentate nucleus. The most optimal protocol for tremor reduction will be selected during this experiment. Thus, experiment 2 will exist of one visit day for imaging and another visit day to test the most optimal TUS protocol. Similarly, tremor amplitude will be measured using an accelerometer, and EEG will monitor neural activity during stimulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Experiment 1: Healthy Volunteers

    1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
    2. Participants aged 18-55 years
    3. Male of female
    4. Good health with no history of serious mental illness or implanted metal
    5. Willingness to adhere to the TUS and MRI study schedule
    6. Willingness to avoid caffeine and alcohol intake for at least 2 h prior to the investigation
  • Experiment 2: ET Patients

    1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
    2. Participants aged 18-75 years
    3. Male of female
    4. Diagnosis of ET as confirmed from clinical history and examination by a movement disorder neurologist
    5. Willingness to adhere to the TUS and MRI study schedule
    6. Willingness to avoid caffeine and alcohol intake for at least 2 h prior to the investigation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Experiment 1: Healthy volunteers

    1. Currently taking any psychotropic medication
    2. Any head trauma resulting in loss of consciousness
    3. Diagnosed with a serious mental illness
    4. Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than tobacco) in the past week
    5. Currently in treatment for a psychiatric condition
    6. Pregnancy (a test will be scheduled by the research team)
    7. Personal or family history of seizures or epilepsy
    8. Claustrophobia or inability to stay still in the MR scanner environment
    9. Any metal in the body that is not MRI-compatible
    10. Serious history of migraines
    11. Hair in dreadlocks, braids, or weave (not possible to position ultrasound transducer)
    12. orthopedic forearm or hand problems
    13. Inability to adhere to the experimental schedule.
  • Experiment 2: ET Patients

    1. Currently taking any psychotropic medication
    2. Implanted with a non-MRI compatible medical device
    3. History of thalamotomy
    4. Skin lesions at stimulation site
    5. Peripheral neuropathy
    6. neurologic exam not consistent with ET
    7. Any head trauma resulting in loss of consciousness
    8. Diagnosed with a serious mental illness
    9. Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than tobacco) in the past week
    10. alcohol or caffeine consumption within 12 hours of study enrollment.
    11. Currently in treatment for a psychiatric condition
    12. Pregnancy (scheduled test)
    13. Personal or family history of seizures or epilepsy
    14. Claustrophobia or inability to stay still in the MR scanner environment
    15. Any metal in the body that is not MRI-compatible
    16. Serious history of migraines
    17. Hair in dreadlocks, braids, or weave
    18. orthopedic forearm or hand problems
    19. Inability to adhere to the experimental schedule.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: On-target to sham
Participants in this arm will receive on-target stimulation first, followed by the sham condition
This study will look at both physiological tremor in healthy volunteers and pathological tremor in ET patients. A set of parameters will be tested in healthy volunteers and the optimal combination of pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and pulse duration (PD) will be selected. A closed-loop system will also be tested where the timing of the ultrasound pulses is locked to the peak or the trough of the measured tremor and can adjust in real-time.
This condition will serve as the active control (sham stimulation).
Experimental: Sham to on-target
Participants in this arm will receive sham stimulation first, followed by the on-target stimulation
This study will look at both physiological tremor in healthy volunteers and pathological tremor in ET patients. A set of parameters will be tested in healthy volunteers and the optimal combination of pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and pulse duration (PD) will be selected. A closed-loop system will also be tested where the timing of the ultrasound pulses is locked to the peak or the trough of the measured tremor and can adjust in real-time.
This condition will serve as the active control (sham stimulation).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tremor amplitude
Time Frame: Experiment 1 (short-term effects): 1-minute recording segments up to 10 minutes after stimulation, Experiment 1(long-term effects): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation Experiment 2 (Essential tremor): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation
Extracted from accelerometer data. The PCA component will be calculated by combining data from all three accelerometer axis (x, y and z). The power spectral density average of this PCA component will be calculated before (1min), during and after (1 min) stimulation. The primary outcome is the change in tremor amplitude (m/s²) across pre-, during-, and post-TUS conditions.
Experiment 1 (short-term effects): 1-minute recording segments up to 10 minutes after stimulation, Experiment 1(long-term effects): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation Experiment 2 (Essential tremor): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation
Tremor frequency
Time Frame: Experiment 1 (short-term effects): 1-minute recording segments up to 10 minutes after stimulation, Experiment 1 (long-term effects): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation Experiment 2 (Essential tremor): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation

Tremor frequency will be derived from the same one-dimensional signal obtained via principal component analysis (PCA) of the triaxial accelerometer data. The power spectral density (PSD) will be estimated using Welch's method for each recording segment (pre-TUS, during TUS, post-TUS).

The dominant tremor frequency will be defined as the frequency corresponding to the maximum PSD value within the predefined tremor band (e.g., 4-12 Hz) (expressed in Hz)

Experiment 1 (short-term effects): 1-minute recording segments up to 10 minutes after stimulation, Experiment 1 (long-term effects): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation Experiment 2 (Essential tremor): Up to 30 minutes after stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG oscillatory activity
Time Frame: Experiment 1 (short-term effects): 1-minute segments of on/off stimulation from 10 minutes before stimulation up until 10 minutes after stimulation Experiment 1 (long-term effects) & 2: 10 minutes before stimulation up until 30 minutes after stimulation
Absolute and relative power change per band (post-TUS vs baseline, and vs sham/off-target). Power spectral density will be calculated and band-limited power will be extracted: Alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz),Theta (4-8 Hz) and gamma (>30 Hz).
Experiment 1 (short-term effects): 1-minute segments of on/off stimulation from 10 minutes before stimulation up until 10 minutes after stimulation Experiment 1 (long-term effects) & 2: 10 minutes before stimulation up until 30 minutes after stimulation
EEG Phase
Time Frame: Experiment 1 (short-term): During 1-minute segments of ON-stimulation Experiment 1 (long-term): During full 30-minute stimulation session. Experiment 2 (essential tremor): During full 30-minute stimulation session.
EEG phase (radians) using Hilbert transform at the tremor frequency will be extracted per channel.
Experiment 1 (short-term): During 1-minute segments of ON-stimulation Experiment 1 (long-term): During full 30-minute stimulation session. Experiment 2 (essential tremor): During full 30-minute stimulation session.
Phase-Locking Value
Time Frame: Experiment 1 (short-term): During 1-minute segments of ON-stimulation Experiment 1 (long-term): During full 30-minute stimulation session. Experiment 2 (essential tremor): During full 30-minute stimulation session.
Alignment of the instantaneous phase of the EEG signal to TUS pulses (PRF). range 0-1 with 0 = random phase, 1 = perfect alignment
Experiment 1 (short-term): During 1-minute segments of ON-stimulation Experiment 1 (long-term): During full 30-minute stimulation session. Experiment 2 (essential tremor): During full 30-minute stimulation session.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Essential Tremor

Subscribe