Exploratory Investigation of the Acceptance and Utility of 14-day Trial Periods and Application-related Outcome Measurement (AbEM) Within the Routine Prescription of the DiGA Axia. (RAEMD)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Patrick-Pascal Strunz, Wuerzburg University Hospital

Real-world Quality Management Study With Axia to Evaluate the Measures of the DigiG (RAEMD Study)

This prospective, multicenter, controlled real-world quality management study explores the acceptance and utility of two measures discussed in the context of the German Digital Act (DigiG) for the digital health application (DiGA) Axia: a 14-day trial period and an application-related outcome measurement (AbEM). Patients with axial spondyloarthritis in Axia's indication area who are eligible for prescription in routine care will receive one of two onboarding brochure versions in a 1:1 allocation: either the standard access procedure or immediate 14-day trial access until the health insurance activation code arrives. The manufacturer will analyze aggregated anonymized data to compare voucher redemption and app activation frequencies between groups and to assess acceptance and return rates of a voluntary five-item AbEM questionnaire at weeks 6 and 12. Secondary analyses will descriptively evaluate AbEM results and anonymized usage data.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Patrick-Pascal Strunz, MD
  • Phone Number: 093120140100
  • Email: Strunz_p@ukw.de

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Patrick-Pascal Strunz
  • Phone Number: 093120140100
  • Email: Strunz_p@ukw.de

Study Locations

      • Erlangen, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Praxisgemeinschaft Rheumatologie Nephrologie Erlangen
        • Contact:
      • Erlangen, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Erlangen
        • Contact:
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Hattingen, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Rheumatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Hattingen
        • Contact:
      • Marburg, Germany
      • Nuremberg, Germany
    • Bavaria
      • Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany, 97080
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Wuerzburg
        • Contact:
          • Patrick-Pascal Strunz, MD
          • Phone Number: 4993120140100
          • Email: Strunz_p@ukw.de
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marc Schmalzing, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hannah Labinsky, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willingness to use Axia.
  • Axia indication area.
  • Willingness to activate via onboarding brochure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immediate app-use by a test phase

Use of two versions of an onboarding brochure in A7 format containing a QR code. The brochures are provided free of charge to the study centers by the manufacturer. Each study center receives 20 cards in a 1:1 ratio.

One version contains the QR code with instructions and support for the standard procedure (Axia can only be used once the activation code has been provided by the health insurance fund).

The second version contains a QR code through which Axia can be downloaded from the app store and used with a 14-day trial access until the activation code from the health insurance fund arrives.

Active Comparator: Standard procedure
Axia can only be used once the activation code has been provided by the health insurance fund

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participants with successful Axia app activation within 12 weeks, assessed by successful redemption of the activation code
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Successful app activation is defined as successful redemption of the activation code by the participant. The outcome measure is the percentage of participants with successful app activation from baseline through week 12.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participants with a voluntarily completed application-related success measurement questionnaire (AbEM)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Voluntary completion of the AbEM questionnaire is defined as submission of a completed application-related success measurement questionnaire by the participant.
6 and 12 weeks
Mean AbEM questionnaire item scores among participants with a completed AbEM questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
The AbEM questionnaire consists of 6 items assessing application-related success. One item assesses improvement in health status using a 7-point Likert scale. Five items assess the quality of the DiGA using numerical rating scales ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better perceived quality. Item scores will be summarized descriptively among participants with a completed AbEM questionnaire.
6 and 12 weeks
Exploratory analysis of anonymized usage data.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
App usage days are defined as calendar days on which at least one app usage event is recorded for a participant. The total number of app usage days per participant from baseline through week 12 will be assessed using app usage log data and summarized descriptively.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Clinical Trials on Test-phase with immediate access

Subscribe