The Effects of the STAR Maneuver on UGRA Training

December 20, 2016 updated by: Timothy R Petersen, University of New Mexico

A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Four Sequential Maneuvers on Ultrasound Guided Nerve Block Performance

Volunteers will watch a training video demonstrating how to place a needle in the correct position while keeping it visible. Later the volunteers will be placed in front of a set up identical to the video, and asked to demonstrate how to direct an 80 mm echogenic Pajunk needle into 3 targets in a standardized homemade phantom a total of three times.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

After watching the training video, each volunteer will be placed in front of a set up identical to the video seen. Adjacent to this set up, a single fellowship trained regional anesthesiologist known as the assessor is situated with a screen that allows real time viewing of the ultrasound screen seen by the volunteer. The assessor is blinded to the assignment of the volunteer. Also, the assessor does not have any visualization of the volunteer. This prevents visualizing hand or body movement that may cause a bias. The same assessor is used for the whole study to provide consistent assessment of the task.

The task involves the volunteer directing an 80 mm echogenic Pajunk needle into 3 targets in a standardized homemade phantom. The targets simulate the nerve roots commonly found in the interscalene block. Thus, they are arranged diagonally to simulate the nerve root position commonly seen. Also, they are arranged on a tilt relative to the flat surface of the phantom to simulate the direction the nerve travels. This is important as the tilt of the target requires the volunteer to tilt the probe so that their incidental ultrasound wave is perpendicular to the target for the brightest reflection to occur. This phenomenon is known as anisotropy. This increases the realism of the task that cannot be imitated by commercially available phantoms.

There are 3 goals that the volunteer must fulfill in performing their task. Firstly, they must direct the needle to the 12 o'clock position of the 3 targets. Secondly, they must achieve maximal ultrasound image brightness of the 3 targets at all times. Thirdly, the entire needle must be visualized at all times.

If the needle is not in the correct position, the assessor will verbally inform the volunteer to redirect it to the correct position. If the target images are not at their brightest, the assessor will verbally inform the volunteer not to manipulate the needle towards the target until the targets are at their brightest. Clinically, this functions to prevent the needle being inserted inside the nerve as the targets are not clearly seen. Thirdly, if the needle is visualized entirely, the volunteer will be told to stop manipulating the needle towards the target until the needle is fully visualized by manipulating the probe. A timer records the cumulative time the needle is not in full visualization. Clinically, this functions to prevent the needle being inserted into a nerve or structure that it should not.

After all 3 targets have been completed, the volunteer repeats the task a total of 3 times.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
        • University of New Mexico Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy volunteers
  • Right handed
  • Aged 18 to 55

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any person who has prior knowledge about ultrasound imaging or regional anesthesia
  • Any person who has prior experience with laparoscopy or biopsy
  • Any person who has problems with depth of field or simple hand eye co-ordination task

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STAR
Introductory training by video depicting 4 sequential maneuvers for reacquisition of needle image in ultrasound: see, tilt, align, rotate.
Active Comparator: ART
Introductory training with a video depicting 3 probe position aspects for reacquisition of needle image by ultrasound: alignment, rotation, tilt.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Task Completion Time
Time Frame: Immediately after training
Median time taken to complete 3 iterations of the assigned task, across participants within a study arm
Immediately after training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Needle-not-seen Time
Time Frame: During attempt
Median percentage of attempt time on 3 iterations in which the needle is not adequately visualized, across participants within a study arm
During attempt
Performer Fatigue
Time Frame: During task
Self-reported trainee fatigue on a numerical rating scale (1= least fatigued; 10=most fatigued); lower scores indicate less fatigue
During task

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicholas Lam, University of New Mexico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STAR vs. ART

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Simulator-based Training of Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on STAR

3
Subscribe