Pilot Study of Innovative Sleep Quality Analysis Software Compared With Polysomnography (LUNA)

To diagnose sleep disorders, practitioners primarily use polysomnography (PSG), a precise but costly, cumbersome method that is limited to a single observation. This does not allow for longitudinal monitoring of sleep habits in real-world conditions. An alternative is offered with the C. Santé software receiving information from sensors installed on medical bed. This software analyzes cardiorespiratory parameters and sleep phases without disturbing the patient, enabling continuous and comfortable monitoring. A preliminary study aims to validate the reliability of the C. Santé software analysis, by comparing it to the PSG analysis, considered the gold standard.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42000
        • Clinique Mutualiste
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bruno STIMMESSE, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged over 18 years.
  • Patients affiliated with or beneficiaries of a social security system.
  • Patients capable of completing all aspects of the study.
  • Patients who have signed informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • Patients suffering from an acute bacterial, fungal, or viral infection.
  • Patients unable to tolerate the placement of the PSG.
  • Patients with psychiatric disorders incompatible with the constraints associated with the need to spend two nights at the clinic.
  • restless legs syndrome
  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker.
  • Cardiac arrhythmia problems (e.g., complete arrhythmia).
  • Known and treated sleep disorders (e.g., sleep apnea syndrome) or uncontrolled chronic insomnia.
  • Diagnosed dementia.
  • Simultaneous participation in other research studies.
  • Use of medications that could alter sleepiness, including:
  • Sedative-hypnotics.
  • Neuroleptics.
  • Antidepressants.
  • Anxiolytics.
  • H1 antihistamines.
  • Antiepileptics.
  • Opiates and opioid analgesics.
  • Patients under legal guardianship or curatorship.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Polysomnography
The patients will spend two consecutive nights on the bed equipped with C. Santé software which is also equipped with traditional polysomnography.
Patients visit the Sleep Unit at the Clinique Mutualiste for sleep disorders. During their consultation with the doctor, a polysomnography scheduled over two consecutive nights is proposed (this applies to any diagnosis of sleep disorders). At that time, they are also invited to participate in the study. After receiving information about the study and signing the consent form, the patient returns for their two consecutive nights equipped with PSG, which they spend on the bed equipped with sensors transmitting information to C. Santé software.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The agreement in sleep efficiency measurement performed C. Santé software compared to polysomnography (PSG).
Time Frame: Two consecutive nights
The study's objective will be met if the sleep efficiency measured by PSG and that calculated from C. Santé software differ by no more than 10%. This means the device will be considered effective if there is at least 90% agreement between PSG and the C. Santé software.
Two consecutive nights

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of RR interval measurement
Time Frame: two consecutive nights
Determined from the ECG trace of the PSG compared to the C. Santé software
two consecutive nights
Accuracy of sleep phase duration measurement
Time Frame: two consecutive nights
Comparing PSG-calculated durations for sleep stages (N1: light slowwave sleep, N2: intermediate slow-wave sleep, N3: deep slow-wave sleep, REM: rapid eye movement sleep) to the C. Santé software calculation for slow-wave sleep (N) and REM.
two consecutive nights
Accuracy of respiratory rate measurement
Time Frame: Two consecutive nights.
Comparing C. Santé software measurements to nasal cannula measurements from PSG (analyzed in 30-second intervals)
Two consecutive nights.
Accuracy in positional data
Time Frame: Two consecutive nights
Comparing the time spent lying on the back or side and the number of position changes as calculated by PSG (via a thoracic accelerometer) and by C. Santé software.
Two consecutive nights
Differences in measurements across two consecutive nights
Time Frame: Two consecutive nights
Differences in measurements across two consecutive nights
Two consecutive nights

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Frédéric ROCHE, MD PhD, Chu de Saint-Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25CH123
  • ANSM (Other Identifier: 2025-A02220-49)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Disorder (Disorder)

Clinical Trials on C. Santé software compared to polysomnography

Subscribe