Photobiomodulation for Chronic Pain and Fatigue in Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study (PBM-SEDh-01)

Effect of MLS® Class IV Laser Photobiomodulation on Chronic Pain and Fatigue in Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study in Private Medical Practice

This study evaluates the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy using a MLS® class IV laser on chronic pain and fatigue in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). hEDS is a hereditary connective tissue disorder characterized by joint hypermobility, chronic pain, and debilitating fatigue, for which therapeutic options remain limited.

Participants will receive 10 PBM sessions over 5 weeks (2 sessions per week), using red and near-infrared light (808 nm continuous + 905 nm pulsed) applied to painful areas identified at baseline. Pain (Visual Analogue Scale), multidimensional fatigue (MFI-20), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) will be assessed at baseline (T0), end of treatment (week 5), and follow-up (week 10).

This is a pilot observational study - the first to document the effect of MLS® laser PBM in hEDS. No additional procedures beyond routine care are required.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) is the most common form of EDS (80-90% of cases), diagnosed according to the 2017 International Consortium criteria. Chronic pain and fatigue are the two most disabling symptoms. No randomized controlled trial has evaluated the effect of MLS® class IV laser photobiomodulation in hEDS to date.

Intervention: Photobiomodulation using ASAlaser M-Hi device (MLS® technology: synchronized 808nm continuous + 905nm pulsed emissions, CE MDR class IV). Progressive fluence: 4 J/cm² (sessions 1-2), 6 J/cm² (sessions 3-6), 8 J/cm² (sessions 7-10). Maximum 3-4 zones per session. Treatment areas individualized based on pain mapping at baseline.

Design: Single-center prospective observational pilot study in private practice. No randomization, no control group, no modification of ongoing treatment.

Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (paired, non-parametric), descriptive statistics. Exploratory pilot - no formal power calculation. Target sample size: 20-25 patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Île-de-France Region
      • Boulogne-Billancourt, Île-de-France Region, France, 92100
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Médical ISM
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with confirmed hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS), diagnosed according to the 2017 International Consortium criteria, presenting with chronic pain (≥ 3 months, VAS ≥ 4/10) and/or fatigue, followed in private outpatient practice at Centre Médical ISM, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. Patients are recruited consecutively among those already receiving photobiomodulation therapy as part of their routine care. No healthy volunteers are included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Confirmed diagnosis of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) according to 2017 International Consortium criteria
  • Chronic pain ≥ 3 months, average VAS score ≥ 4/10 over the preceding week
  • Stable analgesic treatment for ≥ 4 weeks (if any)
  • Follow-up at Centre Médical ISM, Boulogne-Billancourt
  • Informed and non-opposition signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicious or malignant skin lesion on areas to be treated
  • Non-modifiable photosensitizing treatment
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Photosensitive epilepsy
  • Acute articular inflammatory flare at inclusion date
  • Analgesic treatment modification within 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Simultaneous participation in another research protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in chronic pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) to Week 5 (end of PBM treatment cycle)
Change in pain intensity measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10), representing average pain over the preceding week. A decrease of ≥ 1.5 points is considered clinically meaningful.
Baseline (T0) to Week 5 (end of PBM treatment cycle)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Durability of pain relief
Time Frame: Week 5 to Week 10 (5 weeks post-treatment follow-up)
Change in VAS score between end of treatment and follow-up, to assess persistence of analgesic effect after PBM cessation
Week 5 to Week 10 (5 weeks post-treatment follow-up)
Change in multidimensional fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Week 5 (T5), and Week 10 (T10)

Change in fatigue assessed by the Multidimensional Fatigue

Inventory (MFI-20), comprising 20 items across 5 subscales:

General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Reduced Activity, Reduced Motivation, and Mental Fatigue. Total score ranges from 20 to 100.

Baseline (T0), Week 5 (T5), and Week 10 (T10)
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Week 5 (T5), and Week 10 (T10)
Change in quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS, 0-100).
Baseline (T0), Week 5 (T5), and Week 10 (T10)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerability of PBM therapy
Time Frame: Each session, from Week 1 to Week 5 (sessions 1 to 10)
Frequency and nature of local adverse events (redness, discomfort, transient pain aggravation) recorded at each session by the investigator.
Each session, from Week 1 to Week 5 (sessions 1 to 10)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Hypermobile Chronic Pain Fatigue

Subscribe