STABLE Pilates for Hypermobility (STABLE)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Samantha Meints, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Pilates for Hypermobility: A Pilot Feasibility Study

This study is looking at whether Pilates-based exercise can help with hypermobility-related symptoms, like pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, investigators are looking at whether 6 weeks of Pilates-based exercise led by a licensed physical therapist can help with hypermobility-related symptoms, like pain. Pilates is a gentle mind-body exercise with an emphasis on muscular control, postural awareness, and breathing that may be particularly well-suited for managing hypermobility. Exercises are mostly floor-based and focus on developing muscular strength and stability which may improve pain and symptom management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States, 01467
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years old;
  • Self-reported hypermobility with confirmed or suspected diagnosis of hEDS/HSD;
  • Self-reported persistent pain ≥ 3 months;
  • A minimum of 3/10 self-reported pain intensity in the past week
  • Able to get on and off the floor without assistance;
  • Able to communicate fluently in English; and
  • Able to provide written, informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Regular ongoing mind-body practice (e.g. Tai chi, yoga, pilates) defined as a regular weekly practice of at least 20min/week over the past 6 months;
  • Recent surgery or acute bone, joint or nerve injury (<6 months);
  • Have a history of a severe or progressive neurological or movement disorder;
  • Pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study, or currently breast feeding;
  • Unable to get on and off the floor without assistance;
  • Unable to complete study procedures due to cognitive impairment;
  • Unable to provide written, informed consent; or
  • Currently participating in or planning to participate in another physical activity, mind-body or pain-related intervention research study in the next 4 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pilates
6 weeks of once weekly in-person Pilates-based exercise classes
Pilates is a gentle mind-body exercise with an emphasis on muscular control, postural awareness, and breathing that may be particularly well-suited for managing hypermobility. Exercises are mostly floor-based and focus on developing muscular strength and stability which may improve pain and symptom management
Active Comparator: Enhanced Usual Care
6 weeks of once weekly educational seminars pertaining to hypermobility symptom management
Educational seminars pertaining to hypermobility symptom management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention Feasibility
Time Frame: Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)
Recruitment, Retention, Attendance
Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)
Acceptability
Time Frame: Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6)
Treatment Helpfulness Questionnaire (THQ): The THQ is a single-item measure that evaluates the perception of helpfulness of an intervention. Participants will be asked to rate the helpfulness of the intervention to which they are randomized on a scale of -5 (extremely harmful) to 5 (extremely helpful) with 0 indicating "neutral."
Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile (PROMIS-29) will be used to assess pain intensity. Scores range from 8-40 with higher scores indicating a greater presence of the corresponding construct.
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Pain interference
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile (PROMIS-29) will be used to assess pain interference. Scores range from 8-40 with higher scores indicating a greater presence of the corresponding construct.
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Bristol Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Bristol Impact of Hypermobility Questionnaire will be used to assess the self-reported functional impact of joint hypermobility. Higher scores indicate more severe functional impact
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
WPI
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Widespread Pain Inventory (WPI) will be used to assess the widespreadness of body pain. Scores range from 0-19 with higher scores indicating more widespread pain.
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
PCS
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used to assess pain-related rumination, magnification, and helplessness in response to pain. Scores range from 0-52 with higher scores indicating more pain catastrophizing.
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
MAIA-2
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 (MAIA-2) will be used to assess 8 domains pertaining to beliefs about the body and tendencies to be internally focused, including noticing, not distracting, not worrying, attention regulation, emotional awareness, body listening and trusting. Scores range from 0-5 with higher scores indicating higher interoceptive sensibility.
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
TSK
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) will be used to assess fear of movement. Scores range from 17-68 with higher scores indicating more fear of movement.
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
SHS
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Sensory Hypersensitivity Scale (SHS) will be used to assess multisensory sensitivity to items related to sensitivity to light, heat, cold, allergies, pain, smell, hearing, taste, and touch. Higher scores indicate more multisensory sensitivity. The scale will be modified to include an additional rating of bothersomeness from 1 (Not bothersome at all) to 5 (Extremely bothersome) for each of the original scale items to evaluate multisensory bothersomeness
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Overall physical and mental health
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile (PROMIS-29) will be used to assess overall physical and mental health, with subscales including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social participation, and sleep disturbance. Scores range from 8-40 with higher scores indicating a greater degree of the corresponding construct
Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Heartrate Variability
Time Frame: Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)
resting HRV
Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)
Functional mobility
Time Frame: Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)
Functional endurance
Time Frame: Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)
Functional endurance will be measured with the 2-minute walk test (2MWT)
Enrollment to end of intervention (week 6) and follow-up (week 12)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline testing
Pain sensitivity will be assessed using a Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery. The QST assessment will include responses to innocuous stimuli, mechanical pain sensitivity, heat sensitivity, conditioned pain modulation, and temporal summation of pain (a measure of central sensitizability).
Baseline testing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samantha Meints, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypermobile EDS (hEDS)

Clinical Trials on Pilates

Subscribe