- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07674160
Effect of Simethicone on Colon Preparation During Water Exchange Colonoscopy
June 23, 2026 updated by: Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
Effects of Simethicone on Colon Preparation in Water Exchange Colonoscopies: a Randomized Controlled Study
Background: Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality by enabling early detection and removal of adenomas.
Its effectiveness, however, depends heavily on bowel preparation quality and mucosal visibility.
Simethicone, an anti-foaming agent, decreases intraluminal bubbles and improves visualization; studies in conventional air-insufflation colonoscopy generally show benefits for cleanliness and patient comfort, but evidence in water-exchange (WE) colonoscopy remains limited.Objective: To evaluate whether adding oral simethicone to a split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimen further improves bowel cleanliness and procedural performance in WE colonoscopy.Methods: Adults undergoing outpatient colonoscopy will be randomly assigned (1:1) to a simethicone group or a control group, with a planned enrollment of 180 participants.
All procedures will use the WE insertion technique, and endoscopists will be blinded to group allocation.
The primary endpoint is the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS); adequate preparation is defined as a total score ≥6 with all segment scores ≥2.
Secondary endpoints include bubble score and CEBuS, adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), cecal intubation rate and time, withdrawal time, volume of water used and flushing/irrigation metrics, and patient-reported tolerability and satisfaction.Expected Results: Compared with PEG alone, adding simethicone is expected to (1) increase the proportion of adequate BBPS preparations, (2) reduce bubble coverage, (3) maintain or potentially improve ADR/PDR, and (4) enhance patient tolerability and satisfaction.Conclusion:
If effective, this intervention would provide a simple, low-cost strategy to optimize the quality of WE colonoscopy.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
180
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Chih -Wei Tseng
- Phone Number: +886-5-2648000
- Email: cwtseng2@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Consecutive patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy.
- Procedures performed by participating endoscopists.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Colonoscopy performed using air insufflation or water immersion technique.
- History of colorectal surgery (e.g., colectomy or colostomy).
- Known or suspected colonic obstruction or severe stricture.
- Requirement for inpatient bowel preparation.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to simethicone.
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Without simethicone group
follow a bowel preparation protocol consisting of 10 mg of bisacodyl and 2 liters of PEG solution.
|
All participants followed a standardized bowel preparation protocol consisting of 10 mg of bisacodyl and 2 liters of PEG solution administered in a split-dose regimen.
|
|
Experimental: With simethicone group
Participants received a total of 30 mL of simethicone, with 15 mL added to each 1-liter dose of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in the split-dose regimen.
|
All participants followed a standardized bowel preparation protocol consisting of 10 mg of bisacodyl and 2 liters of PEG solution administered in a split-dose regimen.
Participants in the simethicone group additionally received 30 mL of simethicone (600 mg), with 15 mL added to each 1-liter dose of PEG solution.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS)
Time Frame: At the time of colonoscopy.
|
Bowel preparation quality assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
Adequate preparation is defined as a total score ≥6 with all segment scores ≥2.
|
At the time of colonoscopy.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bubble score assessed using a 4-point bubble scale
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
Bubble score assessed during colonoscopy using a 4-point scale (0-3) for each colon segment, where higher scores indicate more bubbles.
|
During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
|
Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale(CEBuS)
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
Bowel cleanliness assessed using the Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS), categorized based on the percentage of mucosal surface obscured by bubbles (e.g., <5%, 5-50%, >50%).Higher scores indicate poorer visibility due to bubbles.
|
During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
|
Adenoma detection rate (ADR)
Time Frame: one week
|
one week
|
|
|
Polyp detection rate (PDR)
Time Frame: one week
|
one week
|
|
|
Cecal intubation rate
Time Frame: At the time of colonoscopy.
|
Proportion of procedures in which the cecum is successfully reached.
|
At the time of colonoscopy.
|
|
Cecal intubation time
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
Time from insertion to successful cecal intubation, measured in minutes.
|
During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
|
Withdrawal time
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
Time from cecal intubation to scope withdrawal, measured in minutes.
|
During the colonoscopy procedure.
|
|
Volume of water infused
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
Total volume of water infused during colonoscopy, measured in milliliters.
|
During the procedure.
|
|
Volume of fluid aspirated
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Total volume of fluid aspirated during colonoscopy, measured in milliliters.
|
During the procedure
|
|
Patient-reported pain score
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure.
|
Pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
|
Immediately after the procedure.
|
|
Patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure.
|
Patient satisfaction assessed using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
|
Immediately after the procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun 28;15(24):3032-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3032.
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
- Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.
- Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
- Cao RR, Wang L, Gao C, Pan JH, Yoshida EM, Li HY, Qi XS. Effect of oral simethicone on the quality of colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Dig Dis. 2022 Mar;23(3):134-148. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13084. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
- Sun M, Yang G, Wang Y. Cleaning effect and tolerance of 16 bowel preparation regimens on adult patients before colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 11;38(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04355-3.
- Zhang S, Zheng D, Wang J, Wu J, Lei P, Luo Q, Wang L, Zhang B, Wang H, Cui Y, Chen M. Simethicone improves bowel cleansing with low-volume polyethylene glycol: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018 Apr;50(4):412-422. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121337. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
- Joao M, Areia M, Alves S, Elvas L, Brito D, Saraiva S, Cadime AT. The Effect of Oral Simethicone in a Bowel Preparation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 15;31(2):116-123. doi: 10.1159/000530866. eCollection 2024 Apr.
- Bai Y, Fang J, Zhao SB, Wang D, Li YQ, Shi RH, Sun ZQ, Sun MJ, Ji F, Si JM, Li ZS. Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2018 Feb;50(2):128-136. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119213. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
- Moolla M, Dang JT, Shaw A, Dang TNT, Tian C, Karmali S, Sultanian R. Simethicone decreases bloating and improves bowel preparation effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3899-3909. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07066-5. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
- Menees SB, Elliott E, Govani S, Anastassiades C, Judd S, Urganus A, Boyce S, Schoenfeld P. The impact of bowel cleansing on follow-up recommendations in average-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):148-54. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.243.
- Sharma P, Burke CA, Johnson DA, Cash BD. The importance of colonoscopy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention. Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E673-E683. doi: 10.1055/a-1127-3144. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 23, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
June 29, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 29, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 23, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A11403003
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Bowel Preparation
-
Shanghai Changzheng HospitalRenJi HospitalNot yet recruitingQuality of Small Bowel Preparation
-
LanZhou UniversityNot yet recruitingColonoscopy | Bowel Preparation | Quality of HealthcareChina
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruiting
-
Makassed General HospitalCompletedBowel Preparation QualityLebanon
-
Kyungpook National University HospitalCompletedBowel Preparation QualityKorea, Republic of
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzUnknownPatient Education | Quality Standards in Colonoscopy | Acceptance of Bowel-preparationGermany
-
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research...CompletedAssessing Bowel Preparation QualityPakistan
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalCompletedColonoscopy | Bowel Preparation QualityTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedEfficacy of Bowel Preparation | Ease of Bowel Preparation and Patient TolerabilityCanada
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityRecruitingColonoscopy | Patient Education | Bowel Preparation QualityTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on PEG
-
BioMarin PharmaceuticalCompletedPhenylketonuriaUnited States
-
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityHubei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Wuhan Central Hospital; The Third... and other collaboratorsCompletedBowel Preparation Before ColonoscopyChina
-
Jerry DangTerminatedTube Feeding | Aspiration Pneumonias | Enteral FeedsUnited States
-
Inje UniversityCompletedColonoscopy | Bowel PreparationKorea, Republic of
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaCompletedColonoscopy | Bowel Preparation | Hospitalized PatientsItaly
-
Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.CompletedPediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency (PGHD)China
-
Devirex AGTerminatedGenital HerpesSwitzerland
-
Beijing Ditan HospitalBeijing YouAn Hospital; Beijing 302 Hospital/5th Medical Center of Chinese...Recruiting