Total en Bloc Urethra Preservation at Robot-assisted Prostatectomy IDEAL Stage 2a (ToP-RAP)

June 28, 2026 updated by: Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah

Total en Bloc Urethra Preservation at Robot-assisted Prostatectomy (ToP-RAP): A Prospective IDEAL Stage 2a Study

Prospective single-arm IDEAL stage 2a feasibility study of urethra-preserving RARP in localized prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Our study introduces a urethra-preserving prostatectomy concept that maintains the entire intraprostatic urethra, thereby avoiding both urethral transection and vesicourethral anastomosis. We embed the technique in a transparent IDEAL-based framework with predefined intra-operative decision rules, including prespecified conversion to standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. This positions the technique as a distinct step beyond existing bladder neck- or urethra-sparing modifications, and provides the first prospective multicentre data supporting its feasibility in selected patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40217
        • Recruiting
        • Clinic Bel Etage
        • Contact:
      • Siegen, Germany, 57074

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Life expectancy >=10 years (biological age)
  • No prior prostate therapy (laser enucleation, TURP, focal therapy)
  • No pelvic/prostate radiotherapy;
  • No prior abdominal/rectal surgery;
  • No prior (neoadjuvant) androgen-deprivation therapy
  • No prior stroke/cerebral ischemia with neurological sequelae;
  • No neurological disease (e.g., Parkinson's)
  • Transrectal or transperineal bilateral biopsy >=12 cores (MRI-ultrasound fusion, targeted + systematic)
  • PSA <=15 ng/mL; prostate volume <=80 mL
  • Biopsy ISUP grade 1-3 (= Gleason 3+3 / 3+4 / 4+3)
  • No Gleason pattern 5; no intraductal, cribriform or neuroendocrine carcinoma
  • mp/bpMRI (mandatory if biopsy Gleason >=3+4)
  • No suspected metastases at staging

Exclusion Criteria:

- Failure to meet any inclusion criterion, or patient declining ToP-RAP (offered standard RARP per EAU guidelines)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ToP-RAP
**ToP-RAP** is a urethra-preserving modification of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localized prostate cancer. Its distinguishing feature is preservation of the **entire intraprostatic urethra with complete omission of urethral transection and the vesicourethral anastomosis**. This separates it mechanistically from standard RARP, Retzius-sparing RARP, and the hood and sleeve techniques - all of which transect the urethra and reconstruct a vesicourethral anastomosis - and from urethra-sparing *simple* prostatectomy, which is a benign (BPH) enucleation rather than whole-gland cancer surgery. The whole prostatic gland is removed while only the intraprostatic urethra is retained, with anterolateral neurovascular-bundle preservation.
Other Names:
  • * Total en bloc Urethra Preservation at Robot-assisted Prostatectomy
  • Total Urethral Length Preservation
  • TULP
  • TUP-RAP
  • TUPRAP
  • TOPRAP
  • Urethra-sparing radical prostatectomy
  • Urethra-preserving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
  • Complete (total) intraprostatic urethral preservation RARP
  • Total en bloc Urethral Preservation at Robot-assisted Prostatectomy
  • Full-length urethra-preserving RARP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical feasibility of ToP-RAP
Time Frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Proportion of enrolled patients in whom ToP-RAP is completed per the pre-specified technical standards without intraoperative conversion to standard RARP.
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Perioperative safety (Clavien-Dindo)
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after surgery
Rate and maximum grade of intra- and post-operative complications classified by the Clavien-Dindo system.
Up to 90 days after surgery
Time to urinary continence recovery
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after surgery
Days from surgery to urinary continence recovery defined as use of 0 or 1 safety pad per day. Inpatient continence is defined by Stamey criteria (medical expert assessment).
Up to 12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PSA persistence and biochemical recurrence
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months after surgery
PSA persistence (failure to reach <0.1 ng/mL within 12 weeks) and biochemical recurrence (PSA >=0.2 ng/mL) assessed on serial PSA measurements.
3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Erectile function recovery
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after surgery
Post-ToP-RAP Erectile function recovery, measured via IIEF-5
Up to 24 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, Associate Professor, Martini Klinik am UKE GmbH, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

De-identified patient-level data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional approval and privacy/ethical restrictions.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer (Localized), Urinary Incontinence (C61)

Clinical Trials on ToP-RAP

3
Subscribe