Influence of Early Wound Healing on the Outcomes of Regenerative Periodontal Surgery (EWH_reg)

July 29, 2026 updated by: Andrea Pilloni MD DDS MS, University of Roma La Sapienza

Influence of Early Wound Healing on the 12-month Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Regenerative Periodontal Surgery: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study

This study investigates whether early post-surgical healing (1-2 weeks) affects the 12-month clinical and radiographic success of periodontal regenerative therapy, and identifies patient-related, site-specific, and technique-related factors associated with optimal early wound healing, in patients with Stage III-IV periodontitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-center, prospective observational cohort study addresses two pre-specified aims: (1) the association between early wound healing at 1 and 2 weeks and 12-month clinical and radiographic outcomes; and (2) the identification of patient-related, site-related (e.g., intrabony defect depth, CEJ-to-bone-crest distance, defect configuration, intrabony defect classification), and technique-related (flap design, biomaterial) factors associated with optimal early wound healing.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Rome
      • Rome, Rome, Italy, 00161
        • Recruiting
        • Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Section of Periodontology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients (age >=18) diagnosed with Stage III or IV Periodontitis according to the 2017 World Workshop Classification. These patients present with at least one deep interproximal infrabony defect requiring regenerative surgical treatment. Participants are recruited from the patient pool of the Section of Periodontics at Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. The population includes both systemically healthy individuals and those with well-controlled systemic conditions (ASA I or II), who have maintained optimal oral hygiene (FMPS/FMBS < 15%) following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Stage III or IV Periodontitis.
  • Presence of at least one deep interproximal infrabony defect (Probing Pocket Depth [PPD] >= 6 mm, radiographic depth >= 3 mm).
  • Optimal oral hygiene: Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) and Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) < 15% at the time of surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic: ASA III-VI classification; uncontrolled diabetes; medications causing gingival overgrowth (e.g., nifedipine, cyclosporine, phenytoin); heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes/day); pregnancy or lactation.
  • Local: Third molars; Grade III tooth mobility; inadequate endodontic treatment; teeth undergoing orthodontic treatment; teeth supporting removable or implant-linked fixed prosthetics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Periodontal Regeneration Cohort
This single cohort consists of patients with Stage III-IV periodontitis presenting at least one deep vertical infrabony defect. All patients receive periodontal regenerative surgery according to clinical indications. The cohort will be subsequently stratified into subgroups during data analysis based on the early wound healing assessment at 1 and 2 weeks to evaluate the impact of healing quality on 12-month clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographic outcomes and to identify patient-related, site-specific, and/or technique-related factors associated with optimal early wound healing,
All subjects undergo surgical debridement of the intrabony defect followed by a regenerative approach (biologics with or without bone grafts, or blood clot alone) using papilla preservation techniques (MIST, M-MIST, MPPT, SPPF, or SFA).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL).
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months.
Baseline and 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of analgesic tablets
Time Frame: 1 and 2 weeks
1 and 2 weeks
Early Wound Healing Index (EHI)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 weeks
Assessed using the Early Wound Healing Index (EHI). The index ranges from a minimum score of 1 (complete tissue closure without fibrin) to a maximum score of 5 (incomplete tissue closure with partial/complete necrosis). Higher scores mean a worse clinical outcome.
1 and 2 weeks
Composite healing index (CHI)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 weeks
CHI has two independent, dichotomous domains (wound closure and wound quality), each answering a single clinically distinct question, and reports the outcome as a two-digit composite code.
1 and 2 weeks
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) Change:
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months.
Baseline and 12 months.
Change in Radiographic Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months.
Measured in millimeters (mm) or degrees (°) on standardized radiographs from baseline to 12 months. It calculates the distance from a fixed reference point (e.g., cementoenamel junction) to the bottom of the bony defect. A positive change (increase in mm) indicates bone gain (better outcome).
Baseline and 12 months.
Percentage of Sites With Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Presence or absence of bleeding assessed within 30 seconds of probing at specific sites. The data will be aggregated and reported as the percentage of sites showing bleeding out of the total sites examined. Higher percentages indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline and 12 months
Composite outcome measure (COM)
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of sites achieving a combination of PPD ≤ 4 mm and CAL gain ≥ 3 mm
12 months
Pocket closure
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of sites achieving a combination of PPD ≤ 4 mm and absence of bleeding on probing
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 8328

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe