Modified Entire Papilla Preservation Technique For Treatment Of Intrabony Defects. Clinical Trial. (MEPPT)

October 11, 2021 updated by: Medical University of Warsaw

Modified Entire Papilla Preservation Technique (MEPPT) For Periodontal Regenerative Treatment Of Intrabony Defects. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Regeneration of periodontal tissues is the primary goal of periodontal surgery regenerative procedures. Most techniques include an incision of the interdental papilla associated with defect. That may impair the volume and integrity of interdental tissues. Azzi et al. proposed a novel technique (Entire Papilla Preservation Technique, EPPT) for bone regeneration to secure the integrity of interdental papillae.

This study will search for differences in regeneration therapy of isolated interdental intrabony between Modified Entire Papilla Preservation Technique (MEPPT) alone and combined with EMD, demineralised freeze- dried bone allograft and sCTG. Moreover the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability and one- year outcomes in the regenerative treatment of isolated deep intrabony defects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Regeneration of periodontal tissues is the primary goal of periodontal surgery regenerative procedures. Both resorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes have been widely used to receive periodontal regeneration, as well as different types of biomaterial have been investigated. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD, Emdogain, Straumann) become popular for periodontal regeneration, especially that membrane exposure due to bacterial contamination may deteriorate periodontal regeneration and wound healing especially in the interproximal areas. Hence different surgical procedures have been proposed to preserve interdental papilla. Most techniques include an incision of the interdental papilla associated with defect. That may impair the volume and integrity of interdental tissues. Azzi et al. proposed a novel technique (Entire Papilla Preservation Technique, EPPT) for bone regeneration to secure the integrity of interdental papillae by providing a tunnel- like undermining incision.

The completely preserved papillae improve wound healing process, stabilize the blood clot and the volume of interdental tissue. EMD and bone substitutes (allograft) are applied in the defect to promote periodontal regeneration. By using subepithelial connective tissue graft (sCTG) better quality (thickness) of soft tissue can be achieved. This clinical report describes surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique for regenerative periodontal therapy. This study will search for differences in regeneration therapy of isolated interdental intrabony between Modified Entire Papilla Preservation Technique (MEPPT) alone and combined with EMD, demineralised freeze- dried bone allograft and sCTG. Moreover the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability and one- year outcomes in the regenerative treatment of isolated deep intrabony defects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mazowsze
      • Warsaw, Mazowsze, Poland, 00-246
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years (age 18-60 years), both genders
  • Good compliance and good oral hygiene
  • Systemically healthy
  • Isolated intrabony defect of more than 3 mm depth, combined with more than 6 mm probing depth and attachment loss (stage III/IV periodontitis)
  • The area of the intrabony defect should not exceed the lingual surface area of the root
  • The morphology of the intrabony defect will be detected during the operation and finally determined whether the patient would be enrolled in the trial.
  • The associated tooth should either maintain normal pulp vitality or should have undergone root canal therapy for at least 6 months before.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Full-mouth plaque index ≥ 20% (Ainamo & Bay 1975)
  • Full-mouth sulcus bleeding index ≥ 15% (Mühlemann & Son 1971)
  • Smoking
  • Systemic diseases with compromised healing potential of infectious diseases
  • Drugs affecting periodontal health / healing
  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Previous periodontal surgery in the examined area
  • Affected teeth with 3° mobility
  • Furcation involvement
  • Acute periapical inflammation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental: Entire Papilla Preservation Modified Technique (EPPMT)
Procedure: The surgical site was anesthetized with articaine-epinephrine. After buccal intracervicular incision on vestibular aspects of two teeth surrounding the intrabony defect, a beveled vertical releasing incision was made in the buccal gingiva of the tooth affected by the intrabony defect, on the opposite site to the intrabony defect and extended beyond the mucogingival line to provide access to the intrabony defect. A buccal full thickness mucoperiosteal flap extending from the vertical incision to the defect-associated papilla and neigboring tooth was elevated (subperiosteal tunnel). Interdental tunnel under the papillary tissue was elevated to the lingual bone crest. Granulation tissue and calculus from the inner aspect of interdental papilla was removed. Microsurgical suturing technique with 7-0 materials was performed. Vertical incision was closed with simple single sutures, whereas due to modification of the original technique additional sling suture was applied.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique for regenerative periodontal therapy.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Entire Papilla Preservation Modified Technique + EMD
Procedure: The surgical site was anesthetized with articaine-epinephrine. After buccal intracervicular incision on vestibular aspects of two teeth surrounding the intrabony defect, a beveled vertical releasing incision was made in the buccal gingiva of the tooth affected by the intrabony defect, on the opposite site to the intrabony defect and extended beyond the mucogingival line to provide access to the intrabony defect. A buccal full thickness mucoperiosteal flap extending from the vertical incision to the defect-associated papilla and neigboring tooth was elevated. Interdental tunnel under the papillary tissue was elevated to the lingual bone crest. Granulation tissue and calculus from the inner aspect of interdental papilla was removed. 24%EDTA was applied on the exposed root surface for 2 minutes, than rinsed and EMD was applied. Vertical incision was closed with simple single sutures(7-0),whereas due to modification of the original technique additional sling suture was applied.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and devices for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and Emdogain for regenerative periodontal therapy.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: EPP Modified Technique+EMD+allograft
Procedure:The surgical site was anesthetized with articaine-epinephrine. After buccal intracervicular incision on vestibular aspects of two teeth surrounding the intrabony defect, a beveled vertical releasing incision was made in the buccal gingiva of the tooth affected by the intrabony defect, on the opposite site to the intrabony defect and extended beyond the mucogingival line to provide access to the intrabony defect. A buccal full thickness mucoperiosteal flap extending from the vertical incision to the defect-associated papilla and neigboring tooth was elevated. Interdental tunnel under the papillary tissue was elevated to the lingual bone crest. Granulation tissue and calculus from the inner aspect of interdental papilla was removed.24%EDTA was applied on the exposed root surface, than rinsed and EMD and bone substitute was applied. Vertical incision was closed with simple single sutures, whereas due to modification of the original technique additional sling suture was applied.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and devices for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and Emdogain for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and Emdogain and Allograft for regenerative periodontal therapy.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: EPP Modified Technique+EMD+allograft+sCTG
Procedure: After buccal intracervicular incision on vestibular aspects of two teeth surrounding the intrabony defect, a beveled vertical releasing incision was made in the buccal gingiva of the tooth affected by the intrabony defect, on the opposite site to the intrabony defect and extended beyond the mucogingival line to provide access to the intrabony defect. A buccal full thickness mucoperiosteal flap extending from the vertical incision to the defect-associated papilla and neigboring tooth was elevated. Interdental tunnel under the papillary tissue was elevated to the lingual bone crest. Granulation tissue and calculus from the inner aspect of papilla was removed.24%EDTA was applied on the exposed root surface, than rinsed and EMD and bone substitute was applied. sCTG taken form palate was sutured to the inner part of mucosa flap. Vertical incision was closed with simple single sutures, whereas due to modification of the original technique additional sling suture was applied.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and devices for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and Emdogain for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and Emdogain and Allograft for regenerative periodontal therapy.
Surgical approach using modified papilla preservation technique and Emdogain and Allograft and sCTG for regenerative periodontal therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periodontal parameters measured before surgery.
Time Frame: 1-7 days before surgery
  1. Probing pocket depth (PPD) MEASURED IN MILIMETERS: distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
  2. Clinical attachment level (CAL) MEASURED IN MILIMETERS: distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
  3. Recession height (RH) MEASURED IN MILIMETERS: distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin
  4. Width of keratinized tissue (WKT) MEASURED IN MILIMETERS: distance between the most apical point of the gingival margin and the mucogingival junction
  5. Gingival thickness (GT) MEASURED IN MILIMETERS: thickness of the gingiva measured 2-3 mm apical to the gingival margin
1-7 days before surgery
Periodontal parameters measured during surgery.
Time Frame: During surgery
  1. Intrabony component defects architecture after debridement MEASURED IN MILIMETERS(depth: distance between the crest of the marginal bone and the deepest location of the osseous defect, width: horizontal distance from the root surface to the alveolar bone crest).
  2. CEJ- BD, distance between cementoenamel junction and the bottom of the bone defect MEASURED IN MILIMETERS
During surgery
Periodontal parameters measured on basis of X-ray
Time Frame: 1-7 days before surgery
  1. CEJ-MB: distance between cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the crest of the marginal bone (MB) MEASURED IN MILIMETERS
  2. CEJ- BD: distance between cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the bottom of the defect (BD) MEASURED IN MILIMETERS
1-7 days before surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periodontal parameters measured after surgery.
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
  1. Probing pocket depth (PPD): distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
  2. Clinical attachment level (CAL): distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
  3. Recession height (RH): distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin
  4. Width of keratinized tissue (WKT): distance between the most apical point of the gingival margin and the mucogingival junction
  5. Gingival thickness (GT): thickness of the gingiva measured 2-3 mm apical to the gingival margin
  6. Radiographic evaluation:

    1. Radiographical bone- filling of the intrabony defect
    2. CEJ- MB: distance between cementoenamel junction and the crest of the marginal bone
    3. CEJ- BD, distance between cementoenamel junction and the bottom of the bone defect

ALL ABOVE PARAMETERS ARE MEASURED IN MILIMETERS

12 months after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported outcomes based on VAS scales
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery

Questionnaires:

Scale 1: Pain after surgery (during recent 2 weeks) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very big pain)

2 weeks after surgery
Patient-reported outcomes based on VAS scales
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
Scale 2: Eating disturbance (during recent 2 weeks) from 0 (no eating disturbance) to 10 (very big disturbance)
2 weeks after surgery
Patient-reported outcomes based on VAS scales
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
Scale 3: Daily functioning disturbance (during recent 2 weeks) from 0 (no daily functioning disturbance) to 10 (very big daily functioning disturbance)
2 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Renata Górska, Professor, Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa Diseases in Warsaw

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 10, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 31, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Subscribe