Comparing Vitamin D Results and Acceptability of Sampling Obtained From Dried Blood Spot, Tasso+ Capillary Sampling, and Venous Blood. (VitD TASSO)

Evaluation of a Capillary Self-sampling Device for Vitamin D Testing

This study will evaluate the performance and acceptability of different sampling methods for measuring vitamin D, specifically 25-hydroxyvitamin D₂ and 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will evaluate the performance and acceptability of different sampling methods for measuring vitamin D, specifically 25-hydroxyvitamin D₂ and 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃. It will compare results obtained from the routine self-collected dried blood spot (DBS) cards currently in use in our laboratory, with paired capillary and venous serum samples. This compares the collection using three approaches: finger-prick DBS, venepuncture, and the CE-marked Tasso+ upper-arm self-sampling device. The study aims to assess both quantitative agreement between sample types and user acceptability of each collection method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Current healthcare staff or staff volunteers.
  • Already consented to use the routine dried blood spot (DBS) vitamin D service.
  • Able and willing to provide all three sample types- routine DBS finger-prick sample, a Tasso+ upper-arm self-collected capillary sample, and a venous blood sample taken by a trained Trust phlebotomist.
  • Able to give informed consent.
  • Able to complete a short questionnaire in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Participants will not be able to take part if any of the following apply:

    • Under 18 years of age
    • Not a member of staff or staff volunteer
    • Known difficulty with blood sampling, such as a history of fainting, severe needle phobia, or conditions that make venepuncture unsafe.
    • Skin conditions or injuries on the upper arm that would prevent safe use of the Tasso+ device.
    • Bleeding disorders or current use of anticoagulant medication that would make capillary or venous sampling unsafe.
    • Inability to give informed consent, including difficulty understanding the study information.
    • Inability to complete the short questionnaire in English, as this is needed to assess user experience.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vitamin D sampling
Staff members having Vit D sampling using blood spot, venous samples, and sample collected using the device
Blood collected using Tasso device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement between Tasso+ capillary serum and venous serum 25(OH)D
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Continuous 25(OH)D₂ and 25(OH)D₃ concentrations (nmol/L)
From Study start date for up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
User acceptability
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months

Pain, on a scale from 1-5

1= no pain. 5= worse pain

From Study start date for up to 12 months
User acceptability
Time Frame: From study start date to 12 months

Ease of Use: how easy or difficult each method was to complete

1= Very difficult, 5=Very easy

Dried Bloodspot Venepuncture Tasso+

From study start date to 12 months
User acceptability
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months

Clarity of Instructions: how clear were the instructions you were given?

1= Not clear at all, 5=Extremely clear

Dried Bloodspot Venepuncture Tasso+

From Study start date for up to 12 months
User acceptability
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months

Safety: How safe did each method feel to you ?

1= Very unsafe, 5=Very safe

Dried Bloodspot Venepuncture Tasso+

From Study start date for up to 12 months
User acceptability
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months

Your Preference: please rank the three collection methods

1= your favourite, 3=least preferred

Dried Bloodspot Venepuncture Tasso+

From Study start date for up to 12 months
User acceptability
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months

Willingness to self-collect: how willing would you be to collect your own sample using each method in the future?

1= Very willing, 5=Very willing

Dried Bloodspot Venepuncture Tasso+

From Study start date for up to 12 months
Sample quality
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Volume adequacy- minimum blood vol 200uL
From Study start date for up to 12 months
Sample quality
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Pre analytical failure- % samples unacceptable for analysis due to inadequate volume or poor quality blood spot
From Study start date for up to 12 months
Laboratory workflow efficiency
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Hands on time (hrs/mins)
From Study start date for up to 12 months
Laboratory workflow efficiency
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Batch failures based on LCMSMS batch acceptance criteria- QC with +/- 2sd of mean, cal curve R value > 0.95
From Study start date for up to 12 months
Laboratory workflow efficiency
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Repeat samples (%)
From Study start date for up to 12 months
Turnaround time (TAT)
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Time from sample request to result authorisation
From Study start date for up to 12 months
Clinical classification agreement
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Numerical agreement (statistically quantified by Passing and Bablok analysis)
From Study start date for up to 12 months
Clinical classification agreement
Time Frame: From Study start date for up to 12 months
Vitamin D status category agreement (deficient / insufficient / replete) quantified statistically using Cohen's kappa analysis
From Study start date for up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2026LAB148

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe