- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07798037
Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Gradient for Intraprocedural Success After M-teer (IASIS)
August 29, 2026 updated by: Konstantinos Tsioufis, Hippocration General Hospital
Iatrogenic ASD Gradient as a Marker of Residual Mitral Regurgitation Severity After M-TEER Procedure
Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has become an established minimally invasive therapy for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who are at high or prohibitive surgical risk.
However, accurate quantification of residual MR after M-TEER remains challenging.
In this direction, the hemodynamic significance of the post-procedural iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) gradient is unknown.
The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between the post-procedural iASD pressure gradient and the severity of residual MR with intraprocedural echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The present study plans to enroll patients with high or prohibitive surgical risk and moderate-to-severe or severe symptomatic MR, despite the administration of maximally tolerated doses of guideline-directed medical therapy and, if appropriate, cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, post-procedural transmitral gradient >5 mmHg, right-to-left shunt requiring iASD closure, or refusal to provide written informed consent will be excluded.
All intraoperative transesophageal echo loops will be acquired using an EPIQ ultrasound system (Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands) with an X8-2t transesophageal probe.
At the end of the procedure, in the mid-esophageal aortic valve short-axis view, flow across the iASD will be assessed immediately after catheter withdrawal from the left atrium using continuous-wave Doppler interrogation.
Through a cardiac cycle, the mean pressure gradient between the left and right atria will be calculated while maintaining hemodynamic stability.
Digitally stored image loops will be analyzed offline.
Blinded analysis will be performed by an independent investigator.
For assessment of residual MR, multiplanar reconstruction will be used, and the largest systolic 3D-VCA will be measured.
When multiple regurgitant jets are present, the total regurgitant orifice area will be calculated as the sum of the individual 3D-VCAs.
The primary endpoint is to determine the association and diagnostic performance of the post-procedural mean left-to-right iASD pressure gradient, measured immediately after catheter withdrawal, for identifying moderate-or-greater residual mitral regurgitation after M-TEER, as assessed by blinded offline 3D-VCA analysis.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Athens, Greece, 11521
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with high or prohibitive surgical risk and moderate-to-severe or severe symptomatic MR, despite the administration of maximally tolerated doses of guideline-directed medical therapy and, if appropriate, cardiac resynchronization therapy
- patients undergoing M-TEER as a bridge to heart transplantation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with post-procedural transmitral gradient ≥5 mmHg,
- Patients with right-to-left shunt requiring iASD closure,
- Patients, who decline to provide written informed consent.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: M-TEER patients
high- or prohibitive-surgical-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation
|
Hemodynamic and echocardiographic assessment of M-TEER procedural success
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
post-procedural mean left-to-right iASD pressure gradient, measured immediately after catheter withdrawal, for identifying moderate-or-greater residual mitral regurgitation after M-TEER
Time Frame: The iASD gradient, echocardiographic and hemodynamic markers of procedural success will be assessed immediately after catheter withdrawal at the end of the M-TEER procedure.
|
The iASD gradient, echocardiographic and hemodynamic markers of procedural success will be assessed immediately after catheter withdrawal at the end of the M-TEER procedure.
|
|
|
the cut-off point of iASD gradient for identifying mild or trivial mitral regurgitation after M-TEER procedure
Time Frame: 4 years
|
To determine the cut-off point of the post-procedural iASD gradient for identifying mild or trivial residual mitral regurgitation after M-TEER procedure
|
4 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Sakul S, DiazSaravia S, Berman B, Dominguez AC, Lerakis S, Argulian E. "Echo-derived estimate of peak left atrial pressure in patients with iatrogenic atrial septal defects following transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair". Int J Cardiol. 2026 Feb 1;444:133975. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133975. Epub 2025 Oct 25.
- Zoghbi WA, Asch FM, Bruce C, Gillam LD, Grayburn PA, Hahn RT, Inglessis I, Islam AM, Lerakis S, Little SH, Siegel RJ, Skubas N, Slesnick TC, Stewart WJ, Thavendiranathan P, Weissman NJ, Yasukochi S, Zimmerman KG. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Percutaneous Valve Repair or Replacement: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Apr;32(4):431-475. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 20. No abstract available.
- Little SH, Quader N, Brady M, Dillenbeck A, Garcia-Sayan E, Jain R, Mackensen GB, Price MJ, Saric M, Scalia GM, Wang DD, Hahn RT. Guidelines for the Intraprocedural Imaging for Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (M-TEER): Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2026 Jun;39(6):529-550. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2026.03.003.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 9, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 10, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 10, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 29, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
September 1, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 1, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 29, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22532/19-12-2023
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.