Group cognitive behavioural therapy with virtual reality exposure versus group cognitive behavioural therapy with in vivo exposure for social anxiety disorder and agoraphobia: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Benjamin Arnfred, Peter Bang, Carsten Hjorthøj, Clas Winding Christensen, Kirsten Stengaard Moeller, Morten Hvenegaard, Lone Agerskov, Ulrik Krog Gausboel, Ditte Soe, Peter Wiborg, Christopher Ian Schøler Smith, Nicole Rosenberg, Merete Nordentoft, Benjamin Arnfred, Peter Bang, Carsten Hjorthøj, Clas Winding Christensen, Kirsten Stengaard Moeller, Morten Hvenegaard, Lone Agerskov, Ulrik Krog Gausboel, Ditte Soe, Peter Wiborg, Christopher Ian Schøler Smith, Nicole Rosenberg, Merete Nordentoft

Abstract

Introduction: Anxiety disorders have a high lifetime prevalence, early-onset and long duration or chronicity. Exposure therapy is considered one of the most effective elements in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for anxiety, but in vivo exposure can be challenging to access and control, and is sometimes rejected by patients because they consider it too aversive. Virtual reality allows flexible and controlled exposure to challenging situations in an immersive and protected environment.

Aim: The SoREAL-trial aims to investigate the effect of group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT-in vivo) versus group CBT with virtual reality exposure (CBT-in virtuo) for patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and/or agoraphobia, in mixed groups.

Methods and analysis: The design is an investigator-initiated randomised, assessor-blinded, parallel-group and superiority-designed clinical trial. Three hundred two patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and/or agoraphobia will be included from the regional mental health centres of Copenhagen and North Sealand and the Northern Region of Denmark. All patients will be offered a manual-based 14-week cognitive behavioural group treatment programme, including eight sessions with exposure therapy. Therapy groups will be centrally randomised with concealed allocation sequence to either CBT-in virtuo or CBT-in vivo. Patients will be assessed at baseline, post-treatment and 1-year follow-up by treatment blinded researchers and research assistants. The primary outcome will be diagnosis-specific symptoms measured with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for patients with social anxiety disorder and the Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia for patients with agoraphobia. Secondary outcome measures will include depression symptoms, social functioning and patient satisfaction. Exploratory outcomes will be substance and alcohol use, working alliance and quality of life.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the research ethics committee in the Capital Region of Denmark. All results, positive, negative as well as inconclusive, will be published as quickly as possible and still in concordance with Danish law on the protection of confidentially and personal information. Results will be presented at national and international scientific conferences. The trial has obtained approval by the Regional Ethics Committee of Zealand (H-6-2013-015) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (RHP-2014-009-02670). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov as NCT03845101. The patients will receive information on the trial both verbally and in written form. Written informed consent will be obtained from each patient before inclusion in the trial. The consent form will be scanned and stored in the database system and the physical copy will be destroyed. It is emphasised that participation in the trial is voluntary and that the patient can withdraw his or her consent at any time without consequences for further and continued treatment.

Trial registration number: NCT03845101.

Keywords: adult psychiatry; anxiety disorders; psychiatry.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of data collection. CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of the SoREAL trial. CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Power calculation for secondary outcomes in the SoREAL trial. LSAS, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; MIA, Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia; VR, virtual reality.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
    1. Altwaijri YA, Al-Subaie AS, Al-Habeeb A, et al. . Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the Saudi national mental health survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2020;29:e1836. 10.1002/mpr.1836
    1. Craske MG, Barlow DH. Clinical handbook of psychological disorders a step-by-step treatment manual. In: Barlow DH, ed. Clin handb psychol disord a step-by-step treat man. 5th ed. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press, 2014.
    1. Flachs E, Eriksen L, Kock M. Sygdomsbyrden I DANMARK. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2015.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Social anxiety disorder: assessment and treatment. Natl Inst Heal Care Excell 2013.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults: management. Natl Inst Heal Clin Excell 2011.
    1. Barkowski S, Schwartze D, Strauss B, et al. . Efficacy of group psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. J Anxiety Disord 2016;39:44–64. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.005
    1. Tolin DF. Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30:710–20. 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.003
    1. Schwartze D, Barkowski S, Strauss B, et al. . Efficacy of group psychotherapy for panic disorder: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2017;21:77–93. 10.1037/gdn0000064
    1. Pompoli A, Furukawa TA, Efthimiou O, et al. . Dismantling cognitive-behaviour therapy for panic disorder: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2018;48:1945–53. 10.1017/S0033291717003919
    1. O’Donohue W, Fisher JE. Cognitive behavior therapy: core principles for practice. Cogn Behav Ther Core Princ Pract 2012.
    1. Neudeck P, Wittchen HU. Exposure therapy: Rethinking the model – Refining the method. In: Neudeck P, Wittchen H, eds. Expo Ther Rethink Model - Refin Method. London: Springer, 2012: 1–358.
    1. Butler G. Exposure as a treatment for social phobia: some instructive difficulties. Behav Res Ther 1985;23:651–7. 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90060-9
    1. Koch EI, Gloster AT, Waller SA. Exposure Treatments for Panic Disorder with and without Agoraphobia. In: Richard DCS, Lauterbach D, eds. Handb Expo ther. Academic Press, 2006: 235–8.
    1. Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, et al. . Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med 2017;47:2393–400. 10.1017/S003329171700040X
    1. Cieślik B, Mazurek J, Rutkowski S, et al. . Virtual reality in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of reviews. Complement Ther Med 2020;52:102480. 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102480
    1. Maples-Keller JL, Bunnell BE, Kim S-J, et al. . The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2017;25:103–13. 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000138
    1. Kampmann IL, Emmelkamp PMG, Hartanto D, et al. . Exposure to virtual social interactions in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther 2016;77:147–56. 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.016
    1. Bouchard S, Dumoulin S, Robillard G, et al. . Virtual reality compared with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2017;210:276–83. 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.184234
    1. Botella C, Fernández-Álvarez J, Guillén V, et al. . Recent progress in virtual reality exposure therapy for phobias: a systematic review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2017;19:42. 10.1007/s11920-017-0788-4
    1. Carl E, Stein AT, Levihn-Coon A, et al. . Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anxiety Disord 2019;61:27–36. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003
    1. Fodor LA, Coteț CD, Cuijpers P, et al. . The effectiveness of virtual reality based interventions for symptoms of anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2018;8:1–13. 10.1038/s41598-018-28113-6
    1. Chesham RK, Malouff JM, Schutte NS. Meta-Analysis of the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety. Behav Change 2018;35:152–66. 10.1017/bec.2018.15
    1. Wechsler TF, Kümpers F, Mühlberger A. Inferiority or even superiority of virtual reality exposure therapy in phobias? A systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials specifically comparing the efficacy of virtual reality exposure to gold standard in vivo exposure in agoraphobia, specific Phobia, and social Phobia. Front Psychol 2019;10:1758. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01758
    1. Emmelkamp PMG, Meyerbröker K, Morina N. Virtual reality therapy in social anxiety disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2020;22:32. 10.1007/s11920-020-01156-1
    1. Page S, Coxon M. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: small samples and no controls? Front Psychol 2016;7:1–4. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00326
    1. McCann RA, Armstrong CM, Skopp NA, et al. . Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders: an evaluation of research quality. J Anxiety Disord 2014;28:625–31. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.010
    1. Anderson PL, Price M, Edwards SM, et al. . Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2013;81:751–60. 10.1037/a0033559
    1. Klinger E, Bouchard S, Légeron P, et al. . Virtual reality therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy for social phobia: a preliminary controlled study. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:76–88 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.76
    1. Robillard G, Bouchard S, Dumoulin S, et al. . Using virtual humans to alleviate social anxiety: preliminary report from a comparative outcome study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;154:57–60.
    1. Meyerbroeker K, Morina N, Kerkhof GA, et al. . Virtual reality exposure therapy does not provide any additional value in agoraphobic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom 2013;82:170–6. 10.1159/000342715
    1. Botella C, García-Palacios A, Villa H, et al. . Virtual reality exposure in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia: a controlled study. Clin Psychol Psychother 2007;14:164–75. 10.1002/cpp.524
    1. Castro WP, Roca Sánchez MJ, Pitti González CT, et al. . Cognitive-behavioral treatment and antidepressants combined with virtual reality exposure for patients with chronic agoraphobia. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 2014;14:9–17. 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70032-8
    1. Malbos E, Rapee RM, Kavakli M. A controlled study of agoraphobia and the independent effect of virtual reality exposure therapy. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2013;47:160–8. 10.1177/0004867412453626
    1. Malbos E, Rapee RM, Kavakli M. Isolating the effect of virtual reality based exposure therapy for agoraphobia: a comparative trial. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;167:45–50.
    1. Penate W, Pitti CT, Manuel Bethencourt J. The effects of a treatment based on the use of virtual reality exposure and cognitive-behavioral therapy applied to patients with agoraphobia. Int J Clin Heal Psychol 2008;8:5–22.
    1. Gould RA, Buckminster S, Pollack MH, et al. . Cognitive-behavioral and pharmacological treatment for social phobia: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 1997;4:291–306. 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1997.tb00123.x
    1. Hans E, Hiller W. A meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies on outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33:954–64. 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.003
    1. Roberge P, Marchand A, Reinharz D, et al. . Cognitive-behavioral treatment for panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behav Modif 2008;32:333–51. 10.1177/0145445507309025
    1. Mavranezouli I, Mayo-Wilson E, Dias S, et al. . The cost effectiveness of psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder: a model-based economic analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0140704. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140704
    1. Heimberg RG, Becker R. Cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia: basic mechanisms and clinical strategies. 1st ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2002.
    1. Söchting I. Effectiveness of CBGT compared to individual CBT. Cogn Behav Gr Ther 2014:44–58.
    1. Hedman E, Mörtberg E, Hesser H, et al. . Mediators in psychological treatment of social anxiety disorder: individual cognitive therapy compared to cognitive behavioral group therapy. Behav Res Ther 2013;51:696–705. 10.1016/j.brat.2013.07.006
    1. Mörtberg E, Clark DM, Sundin O, et al. . Intensive group cognitive treatment and individual cognitive therapy vs. treatment as usual in social phobia: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2007;115:142–54. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00839.x
    1. Meidlinger PC, Hope DA. The new transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral treatments: commentary for clinicians and clinical researchers. J Anxiety Disord 2017;46:101–9. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.11.002
    1. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, et al. . Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:617–27. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617
    1. Newby JM, McKinnon A, Kuyken W, et al. . Systematic review and meta-analysis of transdiagnostic psychological treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in adulthood. Clin Psychol Rev 2015;40:91–110. 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.002
    1. Nielsen AC, Zachariassen A, Brendholdt J. KAG Psykoterapi Outcome book 2019–2020 [Internet], 2020. Available:
    1. Shadish WR, Matt GE, Navarro AM, et al. . The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2000;126:512–29. 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.512
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Harnett Sheehan K, et al. . The validity of the mini international neuropsychiatric interview (mini) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. European Psychiatry 1997;12:232–41. 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83297-X
    1. Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, et al. . The mini international neuropsychiatric interview (mini). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatr. 1997;12:224–31. 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8
    1. Turk CL, Heimberg RG, Magee L. Social anxiety disorder. In: Barlow DH, ed. Clin handb psychol disord a step-by-step treat man. London: Guilford Press, 2008: 123–63.
    1. Graske MG, Barlow DH. Panic disorder and agoraphobia. In: Barlow DH, ed. Clin handb psychol disord. 4th ed. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008: 1–65.
    1. Rosenberg NK, Mørck MM, Arendt M. Kognitiv terapi. Nyeste udvikling. Kogn Ter Nyeste Udvikl 2012.
    1. Bouchard S, Robillard G, Larouche S. Description of a treatment manual for in virtuo exposure with specific phobia. Virtual Real Psychol Med Pedagog Appl 2012:81–108.
    1. Hogue A, Dauber S, Henderson CE, et al. . Reliability of therapist self-report on treatment targets and focus in family-based intervention. Adm Policy Ment Health 2014;41:697–705. 10.1007/s10488-013-0520-6
    1. Slater M. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;364:3549–57. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
    1. Cohen P, Cohen J, Aiken LS, et al. . The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behav Res 1999;34:315–46. 10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
    1. Fischer R, L. Milfont T. Standardization in psychological research. Int J Psychol Res 2010;3:88–96. 10.21500/20112084.852
    1. Moeller J. A word on standardization in longitudinal studies: don’t. Front Psychol 2015;6:1–4. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01389
    1. Cuijpers P, Gentili C, Banos RM, et al. . Relative effects of cognitive and behavioral therapies on generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder and panic disorder: a meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord 2016;43:79–89. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.09.003
    1. Heimberg RG, Horner KJ, Juster HR, et al. . Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale. Psychol Med 1999;29:199–212. 10.1017/S0033291798007879
    1. Chambless DL, Caputo GC, Jasin SE, et al. . The mobility inventory for agoraphobia. Behav Res Ther 1985;23:35–44. 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90140-8
    1. Chambless DL, Sharpless BA, Rodriguez D, et al. . Psychometric properties of the mobility inventory for agoraphobia: convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity. Behav Ther 2011;42:689–99. 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.001
    1. Hoffart A, Øktedalen T, Ulvenes P, et al. . The mobility inventory for agoraphobia avoidance alone scale: factor structure and psychometric properties of subscales. Assessment 2018;25:769–76. 10.1177/1073191116659739
    1. O'Sullivan RL, Fava M, Agustin C, et al. . Sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton depression rating scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997;95:379–84. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09649.x
    1. Leary MR. A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1983;9:371–5. 10.1177/0146167283093007
    1. Zahra D, Qureshi A, Henley W, et al. . The work and social adjustment scale: reliability, sensitivity and value. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2014;18:131–8. 10.3109/13651501.2014.894072
    1. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. . The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:461–4. 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461
    1. Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Eval Program Plann 1982;5:233–7. 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-X
    1. Bech P, Olsen LR, Kjoller M, et al. . Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-five well-being scale. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2003;12:85–91. 10.1002/mpr.145
    1. Blanco C, Heimberg RG, Schneier FR, et al. . A placebo-controlled trial of phenelzine, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and their combination for social anxiety disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67:286–95. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.11
    1. Nasrallah H, Morosini P, Gagnon DD. Reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the personal and social performance scale in patients with stable schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2008;161:213–24. 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.012
    1. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. Meas alcohol Consum Psychosoc Biochem methods. Totowa, NJ, US: Humana Press, 1992: 41–72.
    1. De Las Cuevas C, Peñate W. Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in psychiatric outpatient care. Psicothema 2015;27:410–5. 10.7334/psicothema2015.56
    1. Horvath AO. Working Alliance Inventory - Client form 1992:1–5.
    1. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS. Lilienthal mg. simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. J Comput Inf Technol 2009;5:203–20.
    1. Lee KM. Presence, Explicated, 2004: 27–50.
    1. Ling Y, Nefs HT, Morina N, et al. . A meta-analysis on the relationship between self-reported presence and anxiety in virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. PLoS One 2014;9:e96144. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096144
    1. Felnhofer A, Hlavacs H, Beutl L, et al. . Physical presence, social presence, and anxiety in participants with social anxiety disorder during virtual cue exposure. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2019;22:46–50. 10.1089/cyber.2018.0221
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe