CBT Versus CBT With Virtual Reality Exposure for Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia (SoREAL)

SoREAL- a Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction: Anxiety disorders have a high lifetime prevalence, early-onset, and long duration or chronicity. Exposure therapy is considered one of the most effective elements in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety, but in vivo exposure can be challenging to access and control, and is sometimes rejected by patients because they consider it too aversive. Virtual reality allows flexible and controlled exposure to challenging situations in an immersive and protected environment.

Aim: The SoREAL-trial aims to investigate the effect of group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-in vivo) versus group cognitive behavioral therapy with virtual reality exposure (CBT-in virtuo) for patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and/or agoraphobia, in mixed groups.

Methods & Analysis: The design is an investigator-initiated randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group and superiority-designed clinical trial. Three hundred two patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and/or agoraphobia will be included from the regional mental health centers of Copenhagen and North Sealand and the Northern Region of Denmark. All patients will be offered a manual-based 14-week cognitive behavioral group treatment program, including eight sessions with exposure therapy. Therapy groups will be centrally randomized with concealed allocation sequence to either CBT-in virtuo or CBT-in vivo. Patients will be assessed at baseline, post-treatment and one-year follow-up by treatment blinded researchers and research assistants. The primary outcome will be diagnosis-specific symptoms measured with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for patients with social anxiety disorder and the Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia for patients with agoraphobia. Secondary outcome measures will include depression symptoms, social functioning, and patient satisfaction. Exploratory outcomes will be substance and alcohol use, working alliance and quality of life.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the research ethics committee in the Capital Region of Denmark. All results, positive, negative as well as inconclusive, will be published as quickly as possible and still in concordance with Danish law on the protection of confidentially and personal information. Results will be presented at national and international scientific conferences.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Ambulatorium for Angst og Tvangssygdomme
        • Contact:
    • Captial Region Of Denmark
    • Copenhagen
      • Brøndby, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2605
        • Recruiting
        • Psykoterapeutisk Ambulatorium
        • Contact:
      • Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000
        • Recruiting
        • Psykoterapeutisk klinik, Frederiksberg
        • Contact:
      • Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2820
        • Recruiting
        • Psykoterapeutisk Center Stolpegård
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfilling diagnostic criteria for social anxiety disorder (ICD-code: F40.1) and/or Agoraphobia (ICD-code: 40.0)
  • Age 18-75 years
  • Sufficient knowledge of the Danish language
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alcohol or drug dependence (ICD-code: F10-19.20-26).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CBT in virtuo
Receives CBT in group format with Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
The patients receiving the in virtuo exposure will be immersed using an Oculus Go head-mounted display, enabling viewing of 360° spherically camera recorded VR environments. The VR scenarios will thus be high-resolution 360° stereoscopic films, that are played around the viewer. For ease of use, the individual videos will be administered from an app that has been designed to be as intuitive to operate as possible. The patient will only have to put on the headset, adjust the focus and choose the desired environment by looking at it in the app. 360° video was chosen because it gives the most photorealistic visuals, while also being the cheapest to produce. The downside is that it does not allow direct user-interaction (e.g. the viewer cannot affect the environment in any way). To circumvent this, there are multiple junctions throughout the films where the actors will talk directly and unsolicited to the viewer while also allowing time for the viewer to respond.
Active Comparator: CBT in vivo
Active comparator, receives CBT in group format. Treatment as usual.
The therapeutic intervention is manual-based cognitive-behavioral CBT group therapy adapted from the approach of Turk, Heimberg & Magee and Graske & Barlow with worksheets from Arendt & Rosenberg and inspiration from Bouchard et al. The treatment will consist of 14 weekly two-hour group sessions following the manual to ensure equal and uniform treatment for every patient throughout the study. Concurrent psychopharmacological treatment is allowed in both intervention arms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptom severity of primary diagnosis
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Total scores on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) for patients with social anxiety disorder and the Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MIA) for patients with Agoraphobia measured pre-treatment, post-treatment and at one-year follow-up converted to the 'Percentage of Maximum Possible Score' (POMP) and averaged within treatment arms. POMP calculations can bring differently measured items to the same metric and do not change the multivariate distribution and covariance matrix of the transformed variables.

Ranges from 0 to 100. Higher is worse.

Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 6 item score
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Measures symptoms of depression for the last 3 days.Total score will be measured. Ranges from 0 to 22. Higher is worse.
Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Change in Brief Version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale score
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Self-report, total score is measured, ranging from 12 to 60. Higher is worse.
Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Change in Work and Social Adjustment Scale score
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Self-report. Total score is measured, ranging from 0 to 40. Higher is better.
Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Measured between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends
Measures satisfaction with treatment. Total score is measured, ranging from 8 to 32. Higher is better. Self-report.
Measured between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends
Change in WHO Well-Being Index 5 items, score
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Measures overall quality of life. Total score is measured. Ranges from 0 to 25. Higher is better. Self-report.
Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Treatment response on social anxiety disorder symptoms
Time Frame: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale total score below 50 or a 15 points drop.

Ranges from 0 to 144. Higher is worse.

Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Treatment response on agoraphobia symptoms
Time Frame: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia total score below 2 or a 0.5 points drop

Ranges from 0 to 5. Higher is worse.

Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Remission from social anxiety disorder
Time Frame: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale total score below 25 and not qualifying for social anxiety disorder as measured using the MINI-7.

Ranges from 0 to 144. Higher is worse.

Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Remission from agoraphobia
Time Frame: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

MIA total score below 1.5 and not qualifying for agoraphobia as measured using the MINI-7.

Ranges from 0 to 5. Higher is worse.

Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Personal and Social Performance Scale score
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Measured as total score. Ranges from 0 to 100. Higher is better. Self-report.
Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Change in Alchohol and drug (legal and illegal) use
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Measured using the Time Line Follow Back interview, in which you systematically go through every day for the last 4 weeks recording any alcohol and drug (legal and illegal) consumption. Will be scored in units of 12 grams of alcohol and in grams of substance consumed. Less consumed alchohol and substance will be considered better.
Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Change in General Self Efficacy Scale Score
Time Frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Measures general belief in ones own capabilities. Self-report. Total score is measured. Ranges from 10 to 40. Higher is better.
Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.
Working Alliance Inventory
Time Frame: Measured between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends.
Measured the experience of alliance between the client and the therapist(s). Self-report. Total score is measured. Ranges from 12 to 60. Higher score is better.
Measured between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Merete Nordentoft, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen (CORE)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 9, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 9, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After completed analyses and publication, all depersonalised individual patient data will be transferred to The Danish National Archives and made available for other researchers upon reasonable request and with permission of The Danish National Archives.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The current policy of The Danish National Archives is to keep data stored securely indefinitely.

Data will be transfered The Danish National Archives after completed analyses and publication. However, this can take a maximum of 10 years, after which data must be refered to the National Archives.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Reasonable request and permission of The Danish National Archives.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Social Anxiety Disorder

Clinical Trials on CBT with virtual reality exposure therapy

3
Subscribe