Households, fluidity, and HIV service delivery in Zambia and South Africa - an exploratory analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial

Graeme Hoddinott, Hanlie Myburgh, Laing de Villiers, Rhoda Ndubani, Jabulile Mantantana, Angelique Thomas, Madalitso Mbewe, Helen Ayles, Peter Bock, Janet Seeley, Kwame Shanaube, James Hargreaves, Virginia Bond, Lindsey Reynolds, HPTN 071 (PopART) Study Team, Graeme Hoddinott, Hanlie Myburgh, Laing de Villiers, Rhoda Ndubani, Jabulile Mantantana, Angelique Thomas, Madalitso Mbewe, Helen Ayles, Peter Bock, Janet Seeley, Kwame Shanaube, James Hargreaves, Virginia Bond, Lindsey Reynolds, HPTN 071 (PopART) Study Team

Abstract

Introduction: Population distributions, family and household compositions, and people's sense of belonging and social stability in southern Africa have been shaped by tumultuous, continuing large-scale historical disruptions. As a result, many people experience high levels of geographic and social fluidity, which intersect with individual and population-level migration patterns. We describe the complexities of household fluidity and HIV service access in South Africa and Zambia to explore implications for health systems and service delivery in contexts of high household fluidity.

Methods: HPTN 071 (PopART) is a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial implemented in 21 peri-urban study communities in Zambia and South Africa between 2013 and 2018. A qualitative cohort nested in the trial included 148 purposively sampled households. Data collection was informed by ethnographic and participatory research principles. The analysis process was reflexive and findings are descriptive narrative summaries of emergent ideas.

Results: Households in southern Africa are extremely fluid, with people having a tenuous sense of security in their social networks. This fluidity intersects with high individual and population mobility. To characterize fluidity, we describe thematic patterns of household membership and residence. We also identify reasons people give for moving around and shifting social ties, including economic survival, fostering interpersonal relationships, participating in cultural, traditional, religious, or familial gatherings, being institutionalized, and maintaining patterns of substance use. High fluidity disrupted HIV service access for some participants. Despite these challenges, many participants were able to regularly access HIV testing services and participants living with HIV were especially resourceful in maintaining continuity of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We identify three key features of health service interactions that facilitated care continuity: disclosure to family members, understanding attitudes among health services staff including flexibility to accommodate clients' transient pressures, and participants' agency in ART-related decisions.

Conclusions: Choices made to manage one's experiential sense of household fluidity are intentional responses to livelihood and social support constraints. To enhance retention in care for people living with HIV, policy makers and service providers should focus on creating responsive, flexible health service delivery systems designed to accommodate many shifts in client circumstances.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01900977.

Keywords: HIV testing; adherence; antiretroviral therapy (ART); household residence; membership; mobility; southern Africa.

© 2018 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patterns of household membership and residence.

References

    1. UNAIDS . AIDSinfo. UNAIDS; ; 2016.
    1. UNAIDS . Zambia offering antiretroviral therapy regardless of CD4 count. UNAIDS; ; 2017.
    1. Cullinan K. South Africa moves to “test and treat.” Health‐e news 2016.
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Envisioning a Strategy for the Long‐Term Burden of HIV/AIDS: African Needs and U.S. Interests Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Envisioning a Strategy for the Long‐Term Burden of HIV/AIDS: African Needs and U.S. The Burden of HIV/AIDS: Implications for African States and Societies . Preparing for the future of HIV/AIDS in Africa: a shared responsibility. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2011.
    1. McNairy ML, El‐Sadr WM. The HIV care continuum – no partial credit give. AIDS. 2012;26(14):1735–8.
    1. Nachega JB, Uthman OA, Del RC, Mugavero MJ, Rees H, Mills EJ. Addressing the achilles’ heel in the HIV care continuum for the success of a test‐and‐treat strategy to achieve an AIDS‐free generation. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59 Suppl 1:21–7.
    1. Colebunders R, Kenyon C. Behaviour, not mobility, is a risk factor for HIV. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(6):e223–4. 10.1016/s2352-3018(15)00057-0
    1. McGrath N, Eaton JW, Newell M‐L, Hosegood V. Migration, sexual behaviour, and HIV risk: a general population cohort in rural South Africa. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(6):e252–9.
    1. Spiegel A, Watson V, Wilkinson P. Domestic diversity and fluidity among some African households in greater Cape Town. Soc Dyn. 1996;22(1):7–30.
    1. Parsons JA, Bond VA, Nixon SA. “Are we not human?” Stories of stigma, disability and HIV from Lusaka, Zambia and their implications for access to health services. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):1–21.
    1. van Dijk H, Foeken D, van Til K. Population mobility in Africa: an overview In: de Bruijn M, van Dijk R, Foeken D, editors. Mobile Africa: changing patterns of movement in Africa and beyond. Leiden: Brill; 2001. p. 9–26.
    1. Herbst J. The creation and maintenance of national boundaries in Africa. Int Organ. 1989;43(4):673–92.
    1. Adejumobi S. Citizenship, rights and the problem of conflicts and civil wars in Africa. Hum Rights Q. 2001;23(1):148–70.
    1. Cross C. Why does South Africa need a spatial policy? Population migration, infrastructure and development. J Cotemporary African Stud. 2001;19(1):111–7.
    1. Smith DS, editor. The apartheid city and beyond – urbanisation and social change in South Africa. London: Routledge; 1992.
    1. Burman S, Reynolds P. Growing up in a divided society. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1986.
    1. Reynolds P. The ground of all making: state violence, the family and political activists In: Das V, Kleinman A, Ramphele M, Reynolds P, editors. Violence and subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000. p. 141–71.
    1. Jones S. Assaulting childhood: children's experience of migrancy and hostel life in South Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press; 1993.
    1. Guy J. The destruction and reconstruction of Zulu society In: Marks S, Rathbone R, editors. Industrialisation and social change in South Africa: African class formation, culture, and consciousness 1870–1930. Essex: Longman; 1982. p. 165–200.
    1. Demissie F. Imperial legacies and postcolonial predicaments: an introduction. African Identities. 2007;5(2):155–65.
    1. Clark SJ, Collinson MA, Kahn K, Drullinger K, Tollman SM. Returning home to die: circular labour migration and mortality in South Africa. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35 Suppl 69:35–44.
    1. Bigsten A. The circular migration of smallholders in Kenya. J Afr Econ. 1996;5(1):1–20.
    1. Lurie MN, Williams BG, Zuma K, Mkaya‐Mwamburi D, Garnett G, Sturm AW, et al. The impact of migration on HIV‐1 transmission in South Africa: a study of migrant and nonmigrant men and their partners. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(2):149–56.
    1. Potts D. Circular migration in Zimbabwe and contemporary sub‐Saharan Africa. Woodbridge: James Currey; 2010.
    1. Seeley J, Allison EH. HIV/AIDS in fishing communities: challenges to delivering antiretroviral therapy to vulnerable groups. AIDS Care. 2005;17(6):688–97.
    1. Jacobs W, Du Plessis DJ. A spatial perspective of the patterns and characteristics of main‐ and substream migration to the Western Cape, South Africa. Urban Forum. 2016;27(2):167–85.
    1. Russell M. Understanding black households: the problem. Soc Dyn. 2015;2003(29):5–47.
    1. Madhavan S, Schatz E, Clark S, Collinson M. Child mobility, maternal status, and household composition in rural South Africa. Demography. 2012;49(2):699–718.
    1. Pirie GH. Virtuous mobility: moralising vs measuring geographical mobility in Africa. Afrika Focus. 2009;22(1):21–35.
    1. Porter G, Hampshire K, Abane A, Robson E, Munthali A, Mashiri M, et al. Moving young lives: mobility, immobility and inter‐generational tensions in urban Africa. Geoforum. 2010;41(5):796–804.
    1. Esson J, Gough KV, Simon D, Amankwaa EF, Ninot O, Yankson PWK. Livelihoods in motion: linking transport, mobility and income‐generating activities. J Transp Geogr. 2016;55:182–8.
    1. Seekings J. Beyond “fluidity”: kinship and households as social projects. Report No.: 237. Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town; 2008.
    1. Spiegel AD. The fluidity of household composition in Matatiele, Transkei: a methodological problem. Afr Stud. 1986;45(1):17–35.
    1. Young L, Ansell N. Fluid households, complex families: the impacts of children's migration as a response to HIV/AIDS in southern Africa. Prof Geogr. 2003;55(4):464–76.
    1. Hosegood V, McGrath N, Herbst K, Timaeus IM. The impact of adult mortality on the living arrangements of older people in rural South Africa. AIDS. 2004;18:1585–90.
    1. Taylor BS, Garduño LS, Reyes EV, Valiño R, Rojas R, Donastorg Y, et al. HIV care for geographically mobile populations. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78(3):342–51.
    1. Tanser F, Bärnighausen T, Vandormael A, Dobra A. HIV treatment cascade in migrants and mobile populations. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(6):430–8.
    1. Shanaube K, Bock P. Innovative strategies for scale up of effective combination HIV prevention interventions in sub‐Saharan Africa. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(2):231–7.
    1. Reynolds L. Deciphering the “duty of support”: caring for young people in KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa. Soc Dyn. 2016;42(2):253–72.
    1. Hosegood V, Floyd S, Marston M, Hill C, McGrath N, Isingo R, et al. The effects of high HIV prevalence on orphanhood and living arrangements of children in Malawi, Tanzania, and South Africa. Popul Stud. 2007;61(3):327–36.
    1. Mtetwa S, Busza J, Chidiya S, Mungofa S, Cowan F. “You are wasting our drugs”: health service barriers to HIV treatment for sex workers in Zimbabwe. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):698.
    1. Ramjee G, Gouws E. Prevalence of HIV among truck drivers visiting sex workers in KwaZulu‐Natal. South Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(1):44–9.
    1. Alden C, Anseeuw W. Land, liberation, and compromise in southern Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
    1. Hayes R, Ayles H, Beyers N, Sabapathy K, Floyd S, Shanaube K, et al. HPTN 071 (PopART): rationale and design of a cluster‐randomised trial of the population impact of an HIV combination prevention intervention including universal testing and treatment – a study protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Trials. 2014;15:57.
    1. Coetzee B, Kagee A, Vermeulen N. Structural barriers to adherence to antiretroviral therapy in a resource‐constrained setting: the perspectives of health care providers. AIDS Care. 2011;23(2):146–51.
    1. Nglazi MD, Lawn SD, Kaplan R, Kranzer K, Orrell C, Wood R, et al. Changes in programmatic outcomes during 7 years of scale‐up at a community‐based antiretroviral treatment service in South Africa. JAIDS. 2011;56(1):e1–8.
    1. Suthar AB, Ford N, Bachanas PJ, Wong VJ, Rajan JS, Saltzman AK, et al. Towards universal voluntary HIV testing and counselling: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of community‐based approaches. PLoS Med. 2013;10(8):e1001496.
    1. Sabapathy K, van den Bergh R, Fidler S, Hayes R, Ford N. Uptake of home‐based voluntary HIV testing in sub‐Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001351.
    1. Maheswaran H, Thulare H, Stanistreet D, Tanser F, Newell M‐L. Starting a home and mobile HIV testing service in a rural area of South Africa. JAIDS. 2012;59(3):e43–6.
    1. Manderson L, Block E, Mkhwanazi N. Fragility, fluidity, and resilience: caregiving configurations three decades into AIDS. AIDS Care. 2017;2016(28):1–7.
    1. Knight L, Hosegood V, Timæus IM. Obligation to family during times of transition: care, support and the response to HIV and AIDS in rural South Africa. AIDS Care. 2016;28 Suppl 4:18–29.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe