Neither body mass nor sex influences beverage hydration index outcomes during randomized trial when comparing 3 commercial beverages
Kurt J Sollanek, Matthew Tsurumoto, Sadasivan Vidyasagar, Robert W Kenefick, Samuel N Cheuvront, Kurt J Sollanek, Matthew Tsurumoto, Sadasivan Vidyasagar, Robert W Kenefick, Samuel N Cheuvront
Abstract
Background: The beverage hydration index (BHI) assesses the hydration potential of any consumable fluid relative to water. The BHI is a relatively new metric, and the impact of body mass, sex, and reproducibility has yet to be investigated.
Objectives: To assess the independent impact of body mass and sex on BHI using beverages not previously assessed, including an amino acid-based oral rehydration solution (AA-ORS), a glucose-containing ORS (G-ORS), and a sports drink (SpD), compared with water (control). The reproducibility of the results was examined using statistical modeling (bootstrap analysis).
Design: Using a repeated-measures design, 40 euhydrated and fasted subjects (17 male, 23 female; urine specific gravity <1.025) were studied on 4 separate occasions. During each trial, subjects ingested 1 L of each beverage, and urine output was measured immediately postingestion and at 1-h intervals for the next 4 h. The BHI was calculated as a ratio of each individual's cumulative urine output after drinking 1 L of water over their cumulative urine output after drinking each of the test beverages.
Results: The calculated mean ± SD BHIs of the beverages were as follows: water (1.0 ± 0.0), AA-ORS (1.15 ± 0.28), G-ORS (1.21 ± 0.28), and SpD (1.09 ± 0.26). The BHI for both AA-ORS and G-ORS was greater than that for water (P < 0.05). Despite overall differences in body mass, neither body mass nor sex independently affected BHI. Based upon statistical modeling, our results demonstrate excellent reproducibility of outcomes and external validity.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that the BHI may be used and interpreted with confidence independently of body mass or sex. Furthermore, a novel carbohydrate-free AA-ORS and a traditional commercially available G-ORS were superior to water in optimizing hydration, whereas SpD was not. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03262597.
Source: PubMed