Impact of Blood Pressure in the Early 40s on Left Atrial Volumes in the Mid-60s: Data From the ACE 1950 Study

Peter Selmer Rønningen, Trygve Berge, Magnar Gangås Solberg, Steve Enger, Mohammad Osman Pervez, Eivind Bjørkan Orstad, Brede Kvisvik, Erika Nerdrum Aagaard, Magnus Nakrem Lyngbakken, Inger Ariansen, Helge Røsjø, Kjetil Steine, Arnljot Tveit, Peter Selmer Rønningen, Trygve Berge, Magnar Gangås Solberg, Steve Enger, Mohammad Osman Pervez, Eivind Bjørkan Orstad, Brede Kvisvik, Erika Nerdrum Aagaard, Magnus Nakrem Lyngbakken, Inger Ariansen, Helge Røsjø, Kjetil Steine, Arnljot Tveit

Abstract

Background Echocardiographic measures of left atrial volumes are powerful predictors of cardiovascular events and important for assessing diastolic dysfunction. Despite this, there is limited knowledge of factors influencing left atrial remodeling. In particular, the impact of blood pressure in those in their early 40s on left atrial volumes later in life has not been sufficiently elucidated. Methods and Results We linked data from individuals born in 1950 who participated in the Age 40 Program, and the ACE (Akershus Cardiac Examination) 1950 Study. We divided the study population into quartiles of systolic blood pressure in their early 40s and assessed the proportion of individuals with an enlarged left atrium in their mid-60s. The associations between blood pressure and left atrial volumes were assessed in linear regression analyses. Of the 2591 individuals included in this study, 1302 (50.3%) were women, and the mean age in the Age 40 Program was 40.1±0.3 years. Systolic blood pressure was 128.1±13.6 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure was 78.3±9.5 mm Hg. Mean age in the ACE 1950 Study was 64.0±0.6 years. The proportion of individuals with an enlarged left atrium increased across the quartiles of systolic blood pressure (P=0.001). Systolic blood pressure was independently associated with left atrial volumes; the end-systolic volume was 0.09 mL (95% CI, 0.04-0.14 mL) larger per 1-mm Hg higher systolic blood pressure. Conclusions Our findings suggest that increased blood pressure in those in their early 40s is relevant for left atrial remodeling later in life. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01555411.

Keywords: echocardiography; high blood pressure; hypertension; left atrium; remodeling.

Figures

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population.
ACE 1950 Study indicates Akershus Cardiac Examination 1950 Study.
Figure 2. Scatterplot of systolic blood pressure…
Figure 2. Scatterplot of systolic blood pressure at ages 40 to 43 years (x axis) and left atrial maximum volume (LAVmax) at ages 62 to 65 years (y axis), by sex.
Fitted linear regression line: y=20.85+0.24 x, with R2=0.04.
Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve…
Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicating the ability of systolic blood pressure as a continuous variable at ages 40 to 43 years to predict participants that developed left atrial enlargement (LAVimax>34 mL/m2) at ages 62 to 65 years.
Area under the curve, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.54–0.61; P<0.001). LAVimax indicates left atrial end‐systolic volume indexed to body surface area.

References

    1. Armstrong AC, Liu K, Lewis CE, Sidney S, Colangelo LA, Kishi S, Ambale‐Venkatesh B, Arynchyn A, Jacobs DR Jr, Correia LCL, et al. Left atrial dimension and traditional cardiovascular risk factors predict 20‐year clinical cardiovascular events in young healthy adults: the CARDIA study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15:893–899. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu018
    1. Patel DA, Lavie CJ, Gilliland YE, Shah SB, Dinshaw HK, Milani RV. Prediction of all‐cause mortality by the left atrial volume index in patients with normal left ventricular filling pressure and preserved ejection fraction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1499–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.021
    1. von Jeinsen B, Short MI, Larson MG, Xanthakis V, McManus DD, Benjamin EJ, Mitchell GF, Aragam J, Cheng S, Vasan RS. Prognostic significance of echocardiographic measures of cardiac remodeling. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33:72–81.e76. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.08.001
    1. Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994;89:724–730. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.89.2.724
    1. Abhayaratna WP, Fatema K, Barnes ME, Seward JB, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Casaclang‐Verzosa G, Tsang TS. Left atrial reservoir function as a potent marker for first atrial fibrillation or flutter in persons > or = 65 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1626–1629. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.051
    1. Tsang TS, Abhayaratna WP, Barnes ME, Miyasaka Y, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Cha SS, Seward JB. Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1018–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.077
    1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor‐Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:233–270. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014
    1. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF III, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, Flachskampf FA, Gillebert TC, Klein AL, Lancellotti P, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:1321–1360. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew082
    1. Teo SG, Yang H, Chai P, Yeo TC. Impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on left atrial volume and function: a volumetric analysis. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:38–43. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep153
    1. Olsen FJ, Mogelvang R, Jensen GB, Jensen JS, Biering‐Sorensen T. Relationship between left atrial functional measures and incident atrial fibrillation in the general population: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:981–989. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.12.016
    1. Hedberg P, Selmeryd J, Leppert J, Henriksen E. Long‐term prognostic impact of left atrial volumes and emptying fraction in a community‐based cohort. Heart. 2017;103:687–693. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310242
    1. Shin SH, Claggett B, Inciardi RM, Santos ABS, Shah SJ, Zile MR, Pfeffer MA, Shah AM, Solomon SD. Prognostic value of minimal left atrial volume in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e019545. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019545
    1. Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Lauer MS, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Influence of blood pressure on left atrial size. The Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 1995;25:1155–1160. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.25.6.1155
    1. Ghosh AK, Hughes AD, Francis D, Chaturvedi N, Pellerin D, Deanfield J, Kuh D, Mayet J, Hardy R, Scientific MN, et al. Midlife blood pressure predicts future diastolic dysfunction independently of blood pressure. Heart. 2016;102:1380–1387. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308836
    1. Berge T, Vigen T, Pervez MO, Ihle‐Hansen H, Lyngbakken MN, Omland T, Smith P, Steine K, Rosjo H, Tveit A, et al. Heart and brain interactions–the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 1950 study design. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015;49:308–315. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2015.1086813
    1. Tverdal A, Hjellvik V, Selmer R. Heart rate and mortality from cardiovascular causes: a 12 year follow‐up study of 379,843 men and women aged 40–45 years. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2772–2781. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn435
    1. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body‐surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710223171717
    1. Voigt J‐U, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, Marwick TH, Houle H, Baumann R, Pedri S, Ito Y, Abe Y, Metz S, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2d speckle tracking echocardiography: Consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:183–193. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.003
    1. Berge T, Lyngbakken MN, Ihle‐Hansen H, Brynildsen J, Pervez MO, Aagaard EN, Vigen T, Kvisvik B, Christophersen IE, Steine K, et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular risk factors in a 63–65 years old general population cohort: the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 1950 study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e021704. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021704
    1. Vasconcellos HD, Moreira HT, Ciuffo L, Nwabuo CC, Yared GS, Ambale‐Venkatesh B, Armstrong AC, Kishi S, Reis JP, Liu K, et al. Cumulative blood pressure from early adulthood to middle age is associated with left atrial remodelling and subclinical dysfunction assessed by three‐dimensional echocardiography: a prospective post hoc analysis from the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:977–984. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey086
    1. Gerdts E, Oikarinen L, Palmieri V, Otterstad JE, Wachtell K, Boman K, Dahlof B, Devereux RB. Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension S . Correlates of left atrial size in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the losartan intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension (life) study. Hypertension. 2002;39:739–743. doi: 10.1161/hy0302.105683
    1. Ji H, Kim A, Ebinger JE, Niiranen TJ, Claggett BL, Bairey Merz CN, Cheng S. Sex differences in blood pressure trajectories over the life course. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:19–26. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5306
    1. Rønningen PS, Berge T, Solberg MG, Enger S, Nygård S, Pervez MO, Orstad EB, Kvisvik B, Aagaard EN, Røsjø H, et al. Sex differences and higher upper normal limits for left atrial end‐systolic volume in individuals in their mid‐60s: data from the ACE 1950 study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21:501–507. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa004
    1. Singh A, Carvalho Singulane C, Miyoshi T, Prado AD, Addetia K, Bellino M, Daimon M, Gutierrez Fajardo P, Kasliwal RR, Kirkpatrick JN, et al. Normal values of left atrial size and function and the impact of age: results of the world alliance societies of echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022;35:154–164.e153. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.08.008
    1. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1284–1289. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02864-3
    1. Eshoo S, Ross DL, Thomas L. Impact of mild hypertension on left atrial size and function. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:93–99. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.793190
    1. Lam CS, Roger VL, Rodeheffer RJ, Borlaug BA, Enders FT, Redfield MM. Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community‐based study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1119–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.051
    1. Thomas L, Marwick TH, Popescu BA, Donal E, Badano LP. Left atrial structure and function, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: JACC state‐of‐the‐art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1961–1977. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.059
    1. Pritchett AM, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Rodeheffer RJ, Bailey KR, Redfield MM. Left atrial volume as an index ofleft atrial size: a population‐based study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1036–1043. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02981-9
    1. Teramoto K, Nadruz Junior W, Matsushita K, Claggett B, John JE, Skali H, Solomon S, Cheng S, Shah AM. Mid‐ to late‐life time‐averaged cumulative blood pressure and late‐life cardiac structure, function, and heart failure. Hypertension. 2020;76:808–818. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14833
    1. Kishi S, Teixido‐Tura G, Ning H, Venkatesh BA, Wu C, Almeida A, Choi EY, Gjesdal O, Jacobs DR Jr, Schreiner PJ, et al. Cumulative blood pressure in early adulthood and cardiac dysfunction in middle age: the CARDIA study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2679–2687. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.042
    1. Tromp J, Paniagua SMA, Lau ES, Allen NB, Blaha MJ, Gansevoort RT, Hillege HL, Lee DE, Levy D, Vasan RS, et al. Age dependent associations of risk factors with heart failure: pooled population based cohort study. BMJ. 2021;372:n461. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n461
    1. Wang C, Yuan Y, Zheng M, Pan A, Wang M, Zhao M, Li Y, Yao S, Chen S, Wu S, et al. Association of age of onset of hypertension with cardiovascular diseases and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2921–2930. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.038
    1. Gill D, Georgakis MK, Zuber V, Karhunen V, Burgess S, Malik R, Dichgans M. Genetically predicted midlife blood pressure and coronary artery disease risk: Mendelian randomization analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e016773. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016773
    1. Ference BA, Bhatt DL, Catapano AL, Packard CJ, Graham I, Kaptoge S, Ference TB, Guo QI, Laufs U, Ruff CT, et al. Association of genetic variants related to combined exposure to lower low‐density lipoproteins and lower systolic blood pressure with lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2019;322:1381–1391. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14120
    1. Hyman MC, Levin MG, Gill D, Walker VM, Georgakis MK, Davies NM, Marchlinski FE, Damrauer SM. Genetically predicted blood pressure and risk of atrial fibrillation. Hypertension. 2021;77:376–382. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16191
    1. Grundvold I, Skretteberg PT, Liestol K, Erikssen G, Kjeldsen SE, Arnesen H, Erikssen J, Bodegard J. Upper normal blood pressures predict incident atrial fibrillation in healthy middle‐aged men: a 35‐year follow‐up study. Hypertension. 2012;59:198–204. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.179713
    1. Zhang W, Wang JG. Prevention of atrial fibrillation by intensive antihypertensive treatment. Hypertension. 2020;75:1414–1416. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14856
    1. Gerdts E, Wachtell K, Omvik P, Otterstad JE, Oikarinen L, Boman K, Dahlof B, Devereux RB. Left atrial size and risk of major cardiovascular events during antihypertensive treatment: losartan intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension trial. Hypertension. 2007;49:311–316. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000254322.96189.85

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe