Effect of Robotic Gait on Functions in Cerebral Palsy
The Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation in Addition to Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Lower Extremity and Trunk Functions in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Přehled studie
Postavení
Postavení
Podmínky
Podmínky
Intervence / Léčba
Intervence / Léčba
Typ studie
Typ studie
Zápis (Aktuální)
Zápis
Fáze
Fáze
- Nelze použít
Kontakty a umístění
Studijní místa
-
-
Beykoz
-
Istanbul, Beykoz, Turecko (Türkiye), 34810
- Istanbul Medipol University, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
- Dítě
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with cerebral palsy
- Classified as Level I-III according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
- Lower extremity Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of 3 or less
- No skin lesions or active skin infections in the lower extremities
- Minimum height of 110 cm
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of lower extremity orthopedic surgery
- History of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection within the past 6 months
- History of epileptic seizures
- Inability to attend the intervention sessions regularly or maintain study
- Inability to understand and follow simple verbal commands
- Inability to establish and maintain cooperation during assessments and interventionscompliance
Studijní plán
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Léčba
- Přidělení: N/A
- Intervenční model: Přiřazení jedné skupiny
- Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)
Počet zbraní
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / ArmSkupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / LéčbaIntervence / Léčba |
|---|---|
|
Experimentální: Single Group: Sequential Conventional Treatment and Experimental Intervention
Participants followed a single-group sequential intervention design.
After baseline assessment (T0), participants received neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 5/week, 45 min), including weight-shifting exercises, facilitation techniques, sensory stimulation, strengthening, and proprioceptive training.
Assessments were repeated at Week 4 (T1).
After a 2-week washout period, participants underwent a combined intervention of NDT (20 min) and robotic rehabilitation (RB, 25 min) for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 5/week).
RB was performed using the LokoHelp Gait Trainer, a body-weight-supported treadmill system enabling gait training with adjustable speed and incline based on tolerance.
Final assessments were conducted at Week 10 (T2).
|
Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) was applied as a conventional physiotherapy program focusing on facilitating normal movement patterns and improving postural control.
Each session lasted 45 minutes and included weight-shifting exercises in crawling, sitting, kneeling, and standing positions; facilitation techniques; proprioceptive, auditory, and visual stimulation; isolated strengthening exercises for upper and lower extremities; and proprioceptive training.
The intervention was delivered 5 times per week for 4 weeks (total of 20 sessions).
Robotic rehabilitation (RB) was administered using the LokoHelp Gait Trainer, a body-weight-supported treadmill system designed for locomotor training.
The device enables gait practice with appropriate posture and movement patterns without continuous manual assistance.
Each session included 25 minutes of robotic-assisted gait training, with speed and incline adjusted according to participant tolerance.
RB was applied 5 times per week for 4 weeks (total of 20 sessions) in combination with neurodevelopmental treatment.
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE)
Časové okno: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Selective motor control was assessed using the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE).
SCALE evaluates selective voluntary motor control of the hip, knee, ankle, subtalar, and toe joints bilaterally.
Participants were instructed to perform each movement within 3 seconds.
Each joint was scored based on performance as follows: normal selective motor control (2 points), impaired selective motor control (1 point), and inability to perform selective motor control (0 points).
The total score was calculated by summing the scores of all joints.
The maximum possible score is 20 points (10 points for each extremity), and the minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate better selective motor control.
|
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
|
The Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM)
Časové okno: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Seated postural control was assessed using the Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM).
The scale evaluates postural alignment and functional performance in the sitting position.
It consists of three sections: demographic information, postural alignment during sitting, and upper extremity function.
Postural deviations are rated on a 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = good), with higher scores indicating better postural control.
The maximum score is 88 for the postural alignment section and 48 for the upper extremity function section.
|
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88)
Časové okno: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Gross motor function was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88).
The scale consists of 88 items grouped into five domains: lying and rolling (17 items), sitting (20 items), crawling and kneeling (14 items), standing (13 items), and walking, running, and jumping (24 items).
It is used to evaluate and classify functional motor abilities in children with motor impairments.
Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The maximum possible score is 264, and the minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate better gross motor function and greater levels of functional independence.
|
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
|
Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)
Časové okno: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Trunk control was assessed using the Trunk Control Measurement (TCMS), which evaluates both static and dynamic sitting balance.
The scale consists of two main domains subdivided into three sections with a total of 15 items.
It includes two items assessing static sitting balance and one domain assessing dynamic sitting balance parameters.
The total score ranges from 0 to 58, with higher scores indicating better trunk control.
Assessments were performed with children seated in a standardized position (hips and knees in 90° flexion, feet in contact with the ground, and without back support).
|
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
|
Time Up and Go Test (TUG)
Časové okno: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Functional mobility, gait speed, postural balance, and dynamic stability were assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.
Participants were instructed to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.
The total time required to complete the task was recorded in seconds.
The test was performed twice, and the best performance was used for analysis.
Higher completion time indicates poorer functional mobility and balance performance.
|
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
|
Becure Balance System
Časové okno: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Static balance was assessed using a computerized balance platform system providing objective postural stability data.
Participants stood on a balance board in a double-leg stance for 30 seconds under two conditions: eyes open and eyes closed.
The system recorded center of pressure (CoP) displacement in the X-Y plane and postural sway area during standing.
Outcome variables included postural sway parameters reflecting static balance control.
Higher sway values indicate poorer postural stability.
|
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Sponzor
Sponzor
Publikace a užitečné odkazy
Obecné publikace
- El-Shamy SM, Abd El Kafy EM. Effect of balance training on postural balance control and risk of fall in children with diplegic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(14):1176-83. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.833312. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
- Carvalho I, Pinto SM, Chagas DDV, Praxedes Dos Santos JL, de Sousa Oliveira T, Batista LA. Robotic Gait Training for Individuals With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Nov;98(11):2332-2344. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
- Gulzar A, Waris M; Qurat Ul Ain. Effects of 8 weeks functional training programme on posture control and functional mobility in spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Jul;72(7):1278-1281. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.3476.
- Wu YN, Hwang M, Ren Y, Gaebler-Spira D, Zhang LQ. Combined passive stretching and active movement rehabilitation of lower-limb impairments in children with cerebral palsy using a portable robot. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 May;25(4):378-85. doi: 10.1177/1545968310388666. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
- Ammann-Reiffer C, Bastiaenen CHG, Meyer-Heim AD, van Hedel HJA. Lessons learned from conducting a pragmatic, randomized, crossover trial on robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy (PeLoGAIT). J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2020;13(2):137-148. doi: 10.3233/PRM-190614.
- Klobucka, S., Ziakova, E., & Klobucky, R. (2015). P178-2253: The effect of age on the improvement in motor function in patients with cerebral palsy after undergoing robotic-assisted locomotor therapy. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 19, S143-S144.
- Tarakcı, D., Emir, A., Avcıl, E., & Tarakcı, E. (2019). Effect of robot assisted gait training on motor performance in cerebral palsy: a pilot study. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, 6(3), 156-162.
- Molteni F, Gasperini G, Cannaviello G, Guanziroli E. Exoskeleton and End-Effector Robots for Upper and Lower Limbs Rehabilitation: Narrative Review. PM R. 2018 Sep;10(9 Suppl 2):S174-S188. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.005.
- Llamas-Ramos R, Sanchez-Gonzalez JL, Llamas-Ramos I. Robotic Systems for the Physiotherapy Treatment of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;19(9):5116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095116.
- Labaf S, Shamsoddini A, Hollisaz MT, Sobhani V, Shakibaee A. Effects of Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Iran J Child Neurol. 2015 Spring;9(2):36-41.
- Sadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Jun 12;16:1505-1518. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S235165. eCollection 2020.
- Reid SM, Modak MB, Berkowitz RG, Reddihough DS. A population-based study and systematic review of hearing loss in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Nov;53(11):1038-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04069.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
Užitečné odkazy
Termíny studijních záznamů
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Aktuální)
Začátek studia
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
Primární dokončení
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
Dokončení studie
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
První předloženo
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První zveřejněno (Aktuální)
První zveřejněno
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Naposledy ověřeno
Naposledy ověřeno
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Klíčová slova
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
Další identifikační čísla studie
- E-10840098-772.02-6173
Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)
Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?
Popis plánu IPD
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .