AI-enabled Communication to Advance Research Engagement (AI-CARE) (AI-CARE)
AI-enabled Communication to Advance Research Engagement
Přehled studie
Postavení
Postavení
Podmínky
Podmínky
Intervence / Léčba
Intervence / Léčba
Detailní popis
Typ studie
Typ studie
Zápis (Odhadovaný)
Zápis
Fáze
Fáze
- Nelze použít
Kontakty a umístění
Studijní kontakt
Studijní kontakt
- Jméno: Jessica Kahn, MD, MPH
- Telefonní číslo: 718-430-4317
- E-mail: jessica.kahn@einsteinmd.edu
Studijní místa
-
-
New York
-
The Bronx, New York, Spojené státy, 10461
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
- Dospělý
- Starší dospělý
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- English-speaking individuals at least 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals unable to provide informed consent
- Participants who have had formal training in AI prompt engineering
The eligibility criteria are common to both Aims 2 and 3.
Studijní plán
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Jiný
- Přidělení: Randomizované
- Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
- Maskování: Dvojnásobek
Počet zbraní
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / ArmSkupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / LéčbaIntervence / Léčba |
|---|---|
|
Experimentální: Standard AI prompt - Aim 3
Participants receive plain-language research summaries generated using a standardized AI prompt without researcher prompt engineering or community co-design.
|
Participants review plain-language research summaries generated using a standardized AI prompt without researcher prompt engineering or community co-design.
|
|
Experimentální: Researcher prompt engineering - Aim 3
Participants receive summaries generated after researchers complete AI prompt-engineering training and develop optimized prompts.
|
Participants review AI-generated summaries generated after researchers complete AI prompt-engineering training and develop optimized prompts.
|
|
Experimentální: Community co-created AI summaries - Aim 3
Participants receive summaries developed through an iterative community-researcher co-creation process following AI training and structured co-design sessions.
|
Participants review AI-generated summaries refined through iterative collaboration between researchers and community members using community-engaged co-design principles.
|
|
Experimentální: Co-creation cohort - Aim 2
Participants will be divided into three groups, each assigned 1-2 research summaries, and will engage in structured co-creation sessions.
The goals of will be to: 1) define readability and appropriateness, 2) review AI-generated drafts produced by the summary engine, and 3) provide feedback to refine prompts and outputs.
Several iteration cycles will be conducted as needed, with documentation of any changes and the rationale for making decisions.
In this way the team will develop a modular AI "summary engine" that transforms research products (e.g., manuscripts) into draft community-facing materials using co-created prompts and templates.
Co-creation will be conducted during one or two facilitated sessions.
Each session will include structured review of drafts, guided discussion, and documented decisions regarding readability, transparency, visuals or graphics, etc. Iteration cycles will continue until pre-specified stopping criteria are met.
|
The co-designed summaries which result from this process will become one of the three intervention conditions evaluated in Aim 3.
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Confidence in medical research and researchers - Aim 3
Časové okno: Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
This is the primary outcome measure for both Aim 2 and Aim 3.
This outcome measure will be assessed using subscale 1 of the PoRT scale.
PoRT is a validated, self-report measure that assesses confidence in medical research and researchers.
Subscale 1 contains 9 items, with response options for each item ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); thus the subscale ranges from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher confidence.
|
Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
|
Confidence in medical research and researchers - Aim 2
Časové okno: Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
This is the primary outcome measure for both Aim 2 and Aim 3.
This outcome measure will be assessed using subscale 1 of the PoRT scale.
PoRT is a validated, self-report measure that assesses confidence in medical research and researchers.
Subscale 1 contains 9 items, with response options for each item ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); thus the subscale ranges from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher confidence.
|
Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived appropriateness of research summary - Aim 2
Časové okno: Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
Perceived appropriateness of research summary will be assessed using an 8-item scale adapted from the literature which measures community and personal relevance, fit and respect, language and representation, and confidence and resonance (each of the four constructs is measured using two items).
Responses for the eight items range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree; possible scale score thus ranges from 8 to 40.
Higher scores indicate higher perceived appropriateness.
|
Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
|
Institutional confidence - Aim 2
Časové okno: Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
This is a validated measure of confidence in health care institutions, assessed using the MMI scale which contains 7 items.
Responses range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); thus, the range of scale scores is 7 to 35.
Lower scores indicate higher confidence.
|
Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
|
Research comprehension - Aim 2
Časové okno: Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
Research study specific comprehension which will consist of 25 true-false statements (5 items for each of the 5 research studies chosen by researchers and community participants that will be used for creation of plain-language summaries).
Correct answers = 1, and incorrect answers = 0.
The range will be 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating better comprehension.
|
Immediately before the co-creation process and immediately following the co-creation process, up to 1 hour
|
|
Perceived appropriateness of research summary - Aim 3
Časové okno: Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
Perceived appropriateness of research summary will be assessed using an 8-item scale adapted from the literature which measures community and personal relevance, fit and respect, language and representation, and confidence and resonance (each of the four constructs is measured using two items).
Responses for the eight items range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree; possible scale score thus ranges from 8 to 40.
Higher scores indicate higher perceived appropriateness.
|
Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
|
Institutional confidence - Aim 3
Časové okno: Aim 3: Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
This is a validated measure of confidence in health care institutions, assessed using the MMI scale which contains 7 items.
Responses range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); thus, the range of scale scores is 7 to 35.
Lower scores indicate higher confidence.
|
Aim 3: Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
|
Research comprehension - Aim 3
Časové okno: Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
Research study specific comprehension which will consist of 25 true-false statements (5 items for each of the 5 research studies chosen by researchers and community participants that will be used for creation of plain-language summaries).
Correct answers = 1, and incorrect answers = 0.
The range will be 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating better comprehension.
|
Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Sponzor
Sponzor
Spolupracovníci
Spolupracovníci
Vyšetřovatelé
Vyšetřovatelé
- Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Jessica Kahn, MD, MPH, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Publikace a užitečné odkazy
Obecné publikace
- Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003 Nov-Dec;27 Suppl 3:S227-32. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.27.1.s3.6.
- Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
- Snyder HR, Miyake A, Hankin BL. Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches. Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 26;6:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00328. eCollection 2015.
- Marafino BJ, Dudley RA, Shah NH, Chen JH. Accurate and interpretable intensive care risk adjustment for fused clinical data with generalized additive models. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:166-175. eCollection 2018.
- O'Connor MA, Erasmus JH, Randall S, Archer J, Lewis TB, Brown B, Fredericks M, Groenier S, Iwayama N, Ahrens C, Garrison W, Wangari S, Guerriero KA, Fuller DH. A Single Dose SARS-CoV-2 Replicon RNA Vaccine Induces Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infected and Uninfected Pigtail Macaques. Front Immunol. 2021 Dec 21;12:800723. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.800723. eCollection 2021.
- Holzer JK, Ellis L, Merritt MW. Why we need community engagement in medical research. J Investig Med. 2014 Aug;62(6):851-5. doi: 10.1097/JIM.0000000000000097.
Termíny studijních záznamů
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Odhadovaný)
Začátek studia
Primární dokončení (Odhadovaný)
Primární dokončení
Dokončení studie (Odhadovaný)
Dokončení studie
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
První předloženo
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První zveřejněno (Aktuální)
První zveřejněno
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Naposledy ověřeno
Naposledy ověřeno
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Klíčová slova
Další identifikační čísla studie
Další identifikační čísla studie
- 2026-17824
- UM1TR004400 (Grant/smlouva NIH USA)
Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)
Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?
Popis plánu IPD
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .