A randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder

Gang Wang, Alexander McIntyre, Willie R Earley, Shane R Raines, Hans Eriksson, Gang Wang, Alexander McIntyre, Willie R Earley, Shane R Raines, Hans Eriksson

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Patients and methods: This was a 10-week (8-week active treatment/2-week post-treatment) randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study (D1448C00004). Patients received quetiapine XR 150 mg/day, escitalopram 10 mg/day, or placebo; patients with an inadequate response (<20% improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score) at week two received double-dose treatment. The primary end point was week eight change from randomization in MADRS total score. Secondary end points included MADRS response (≥50% improvement) and remission (score ≤8); Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total and item 1; Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety total, psychic, and somatic; Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness total; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global; and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form percentage maximum total scores. Tolerability was assessed throughout.

Results: A total of 471 patients was randomized. No significant improvements in MADRS total score were observed at week eight (last observation carried forward) with either active treatment (quetiapine XR, -17.21 [P=0.174]; escitalopram, -16.73 [P=0.346]) versus placebo (-15.61). There were no significant differences in secondary end points versus placebo, with the exception of week-eight change in PSQI global score (quetiapine XR, -4.96 [P<0.01] versus placebo, -3.37). Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of observed-case data suggested that the primary analysis may not be robust. Most commonly reported adverse events included dry mouth, somnolence, and dizziness for quetiapine XR, and headache and nausea for escitalopram.

Conclusion: In this study, neither quetiapine XR (150/300 mg/day) nor escitalopram (10/20 mg/day) showed significant separation from placebo. Both compounds have been shown previously to be effective in the treatment of MDD; possible reasons for this failed study are discussed. Quetiapine XR was generally well tolerated, with a profile similar to that reported previously.

Keywords: Phase III; antidepressive agents (pharmacological action); antipsychotic agents; clinical trial; sustained-release preparations; treatment efficacy.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. Notes:aPatients who failed to meet the criterion of adequate response (≥20% reduction in MADRS total score after 2 weeks of treatment) were up-titrated to double the initial randomized dose for the remaining 6 weeks of randomized treatment. Abbreviations: MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A and B) Change from randomization to week eight in MADRS total score. (A) LOCF approach; (B) MMRM analysis of observed-case data (MITT population). Notes: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 versus placebo. Abbreviations: LOCF, last observation carried forward; LSM, least-squares mean; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MITT, modified intent-to-treat; MMRM, mixed-model repeated measures.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in MADRS total score over time in patients with an adequate and inadequate responsea,b at week two (LOCF; MITT population). Notes:aInadequate response defined as <20% reduction in MADRS total score from randomization to week two; bpatients with an inadequate response at week two had their dose doubled (quetiapine XR 300 mg/day; escitalopram 20 mg/day). Abbreviations: LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MITT, modified intent-to-treat.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in individual MADRS item scores from randomization to week 8 (MITT population; LOCF). Note: ***P<0.001 versus placebo. Abbreviations: LOCF, last observation carried forward; LSM, least-squares means; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MITT, modified intent-to-treat.

References

    1. Masand PS. Tolerability and adherence issues in antidepressant therapy. Clin Ther. 2003;25(8):2289–2304.
    1. Howland RH. Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D). Part 2: Study outcomes. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2008;46(10):21–24.
    1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Seroquel XR: summary of product characteristics for Ireland. 2013. [Accessed August 1, 2013]. Available from: .
    1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals Once-daily Seroquel XR (quetiapine fumarate) extended-release tablets. 2012. [Accessed July 9, 2012]. Available from: .
    1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals Seroquel XR product monograph (Canada) 2011. [Accessed July 21, 2011]. Available from: .
    1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals Seroquel XR Australian prescribing information. 2013. Available from: . Accessed.
    1. Bortnick B, El-Khalili N, Banov M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in major depressive disorder: a placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Affect Disord. 2011;128(1–2):83–94.
    1. Cutler AJ, Montgomery SA, Feifel D, Lazarus A, Åström M, Brecher M. Extended release quetiapine fumarate monotherapy in major depressive disorder: a placebo- and duloxetine-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(4):526–539.
    1. Weisler R, Joyce M, McGill L, Lazarus A, Szamosi J, Eriksson H. Extended release quetiapine fumarate monotherapy for major depressive disorder: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. CNS Spectr. 2009;14(6):299–313.
    1. Bauer M, Pretorius HW, Constant EL, Earley WR, Szamosi J, Brecher M. Extended-release quetiapine as adjunct to an antidepressant in patients with major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, placebo- controlled, double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(4):540–549.
    1. El-Khalili N, Joyce M, Atkinson S, et al. Extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with an inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant treatment: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;13(7):917–932.
    1. Liebowitz M, Lam RW, Lepola U, Datto C, Sweitzer D, Eriksson H. Efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate monotherapy as maintenance treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(10):964–976.
    1. Katila H, Mezhebovsky I, Mulroy A, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in elderly patients with major depressive disorder. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(8):1769–1784.
    1. Glick ID, Suppes T, DeBattista C, Hu RJ, Marder S. Psychopharmacologic treatment strategies for depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(1):47–60.
    1. AstraZeneca Efficacy of Seroquel SR in Combination With an Antidepressant in Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (AMBER) [Accessed November 18, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT00351169.
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33.
    1. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62.
    1. Montgomery SA, Åsberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–389.
    1. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP): Note for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment of depression. 2002. [Accessed November 6, 2013]. Available from: .
    1. Forest Pharmaceuticals Escitalopram prescribing information. 2009. [Accessed November 6, 2013]. Available from: .
    1. National Institute of Mental Health . CGI: clinical global impressions. In: Guy W, Bonato RR, editors. Manual for the ECDEU Assessment Battery. Rockville (MD): NIMH; 1970. pp. 1–6.
    1. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50–55.
    1. Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, Blumenthal R. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):321–326.
    1. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.
    1. Simpson GM, Angus JW. A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1970;212:11–19.
    1. Barnes TR. A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;154:672–676.
    1. Clayton AH, McGarvey EL, Clavet GJ. The Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ): development, reliability, and validity. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(4):731–745.
    1. Michelson D, Fava M, Amsterdam J, et al. Interruption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176:363–368.
    1. Rosenbaum JF, Fava M, Hoog SL, Ascroft RC, Krebs WB. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44(2):77–87.
    1. Khan A, Schwartz K. Study designs and outcomes in antidepressant clinical trials. Essent Psychopharmacol. 2005;6(4):221–226.
    1. Yang H, Cusin C, Fava M. Is there a placebo problem in antidepressant trials? Curr Top Med Chem. 2005;5(11):1077–1086.
    1. Fava M, Evins AE, Dorer DJ, Schoenfeld DA. The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach. Psychother Psychosom. 2003;72(3):115–127.
    1. Kobak KA, Kane JM, Thase ME, Nierenberg AA. Why do clinical trials fail? The problem of measurement error in clinical trials: time to test new paradigms? J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27(1):1–5.
    1. Vieta E, Pappadopulos E, Mandel FS, Lombardo I. Impact of geographical and cultural factors on clinical trials in acute mania: lessons from a ziprasidone and haloperidol placebo-controlled study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14(8):1017–1027.
    1. Dunlop BW, Thase ME, Wun CC, et al. A meta-analysis of factors impacting detection of antidepressant efficacy in clinical trials: the importance of academic sites. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(13):2830–2836.
    1. Undurraga J, Baldessarini RJ. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(4):851–864.
    1. Yildiz A, Vieta E, Tohen M, Baldessarini RJ. Factors modifying drug and placebo responses in randomized trials for bipolar mania. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14(7):863–875.
    1. Papakostas GI, Fava M. Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;19(1):34–40.
    1. Posternak MA, Zimmerman M, Keitner GI, Miller IW. A reevaluation of the exclusion criteria used in antidepressant efficacy trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(2):191–200.
    1. Stein DJ, Baldwin DS, Dolberg OT, Despiegel N, Bandelow B. Which factors predict placebo response in anxiety disorders and major depression? An analysis of placebo-controlled studies of escitalopram. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(11):1741–1746.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Antidepressant use in children, adolescents and adults. 2010. [Accessed May 1, 2011]. Available from: .
    1. American Diabetes Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, North American Association for the Study of Obesity Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(2):596–601.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit