Efficacy of mandibular topical anesthesia varies with the site of administration

O Nakanishi, D Haas, T Ishikawa, S Kameyama, M Nishi, O Nakanishi, D Haas, T Ishikawa, S Kameyama, M Nishi

Abstract

This study compared the threshold of pain sensitivity in the anterior mandibular mucobuccal fold with the posterior. This was followed by a comparison of the reduction of needle insertion pain in the anterior mucobuccal fold and the pterygo-temporal depression by either topical anesthesia or nitrous oxide inhalation. The pain threshold was determined by an analgometer, a pain-measuring device that depends on pressure readings; additionally, pain caused by a needle inserted by a normal technique was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). The threshold of pain was significantly lower in the incisor and canine regions than in the premolar and the molar regions (P < 0.001). Compared to a placebo, topical anesthesia significantly reduced the pain from needle insertion in the mucobuccal fold adjacent to the mandibular canine (P < 0.001), but did not significantly reduce pain in the pterygotemporal depression. The addition of 30% nitrous oxide did not significantly alter pain reduction compared to a control of 100% oxygen. These results suggest that topical anesthesia application may be effective in reducing the pain of needle insertion in the anterior mandibular mucobuccal fold, but may not be as effective for a standard inferior alveolar nerve block. The addition of 30% nitrous oxide did not lead to a significant improvement.

References

    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Nov;99(5):822-4
    1. Anesth Prog. 1990 Nov-Dec;37(6):290-2
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1960 Oct;32:453-9
    1. Br Med J. 1964 Aug 22;2(5407):480-2
    1. Jpn J Physiol. 1952 Jul;2(4):328-32
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Feb;98(2):213-4
    1. Quintessence Int. 1991 Apr;22(4):311-5
    1. Anesth Prog. 1987 Nov-Dec;34(6):215-9
    1. Anesth Prog. 1992;39(3):79-82
    1. J Clin Invest. 1943 Nov;22(6):871-5
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973 Apr;86(4):842-8
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985 Oct;111(4):578-83

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit