Digital Follow-Up After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Feasibility Study
Prita Daliya, Jody Carvell, Judith Rozentals, Dileep N Lobo, Simon L Parsons, Prita Daliya, Jody Carvell, Judith Rozentals, Dileep N Lobo, Simon L Parsons
Abstract
Background: Although recommendations exist for patients to be offered a post-operative helpline or telephone follow-up appointment at discharge after cholecystectomy, implementation of these is resource-intensive. Whilst the benefits of telephone follow-up are well documented, the use of digital modalities is less so. We aimed to identify if digital follow-up (DFU) was equivalent to routine care with telephone follow-up (TFU), for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: All patients listed for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between August 2016 and March 2018 were offered routine post-operative care (TFU or no follow-up) or DFU at a tertiary referral centre in Nottingham.
Results: Of 597 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 199 (33.3%) opted for TFU, and 98 (16.4%) for DFU. DFU was completed for 85 (86.7%) participants and TFU for 125 (62.8%), p < 0.0001. Over 5 times as many patients who chose TFU missed their appointment compared to DFU (5.6% vs. 30.9%, p < 0.001). At 30-days post-operatively, patients undergoing TFU had significantly more post-operative wound infections identified then those undergoing DFU (17.6% vs 5.9%, p = 0.01). However, this did not impact the incidence of 30-day readmissions between groups (7.2% TFU vs. 7.1% DFU). No complications were missed by either the DFU or TFU modalities. DFU was completed significantly earlier than TFU (median 6 days vs. 13.5 days, p = 0.001) with high patient acceptability, identifying complications and alerting clinicians to those patients requiring an early review.
Conclusion: This feasibility study has demonstrated that digital follow-up is an acceptable alternative to telephone follow-up after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02810860.
Conflict of interest statement
Simon L Parsons is a company director for EIDO Healthcare Limited. None of the other authors has a conflict of interest to declare.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Figures
References
- Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland/Royal College of Surgeons of England (2016) Commissioning Guide: Gallstone Disease. . Accessed 6 Mar 2022
- CholeS Study Group Population-based cohort study of outcomes following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases in the UK and Ireland. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1704–1715. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10287.
- Bailey CR, Ahuja M, Bartholomew K, et al. Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: guidelines from the association of anaesthetists and the British Association of day surgery. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:778–792. doi: 10.1111/anae.14639.
- Fallis WM, Sucurrah D. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: home visit versus telephone follow-up. Can J Surg. 2001;44:39–44.
- Fischer K, Hogan V, Jager A, et al. Efficacy and utility of phone call follow-up after pediatric general surgery versus traditional clinic follow-up. Perm J. 2015;19:11–14. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-017.
- Gray RT, Sut MK, Badger SA, et al. Post-operative telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients. Ulster Med J. 2010;79:76–79.
- Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery. Results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:823–827. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.
- Miller A, Barton K, Hassn A. Nurse-led telephone follow-up after day case surgery. J Nurse Pract. 2012;8:E7–E8. doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2011.09.005.
- Bailey J, Roland M, Roberts C. Is follow up by specialists routinely needed after elective surgery? A controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:118–124. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.118.
- van Boxel GI, Hart M, Kiszely A, et al. Elective day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a formal assessment of the need for outpatient follow-up. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95:561–564. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.8.561.
- Jones TR, Khout H, Bryant D, et al. Rapid response: follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMJ. 2007;335:295.
- National Information Board (2015) Policy paper: delivering the five year forward view. . Accessed 6 Mar 2022
- NHS England (2017) Integrating care locally. . Accessed 6 Mar 2022
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
- Griffiths EA, Hodson J, Vohra RS, et al. Utilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:110–121. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6281-2.
- Sandblom G, Videhult P, Crona Guterstam Y, et al. Mortality after a cholecystectomy: a population-based study. HPB (Oxford) 2015;17:239–243. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12356.
- Attili AF, Carulli N, Roda E, et al. Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Italy: prevalence data of the Multicenter Italian Study on Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL.) Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:158–165. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117403.
- Department of Health (2019) The NHS long term plan. . Accessed 6 Mar 2022
- Fullfact (2019) Spending on the NHS in England. . Accessed 6 Mar 2022
Source: PubMed