Effects of Robot-assisted Gait Training Combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation on Recovery of Locomotor Mobility in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Young-Hyeon Bae, Young Jun Ko, Won Hyuk Chang, Ju Hyeok Lee, Kyeong Bong Lee, Yoo Jung Park, Hyun Geun Ha, Yun-Hee Kim, Young-Hyeon Bae, Young Jun Ko, Won Hyuk Chang, Ju Hyeok Lee, Kyeong Bong Lee, Yoo Jung Park, Hyun Geun Ha, Yun-Hee Kim

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training combined with functional electrical stimulation on locomotor recovery in patients with chronic stroke. [Subjects] The 20 subjects were randomly assigned into either an experimental group (n = 10) that received a combination of robot-assisted gait training and functional electrical stimulation on the ankle dorsiflexor of the affected side or a control group (n = 10) that received robot-assisted gait training only. [Methods] Both groups received the respective therapies for 30 min/day, 3 days/week for 5 weeks. The outcome was measured using the Modified Motor Assessment Scale (MMAS), Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and gait parameters through gait analysis (Vicon 370 motion analysis system, Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK). All the variables were measured before and after training. [Results] Step length and maximal knee extension were significantly greater than those before training in the experimental group only. Maximal Knee flexion showed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups. The MMAS, BBS, and TUG scores improved significantly after training compared with before training in both groups. [Conclusion] We suggest that the combination of robot-assisted gait training and functional electrical stimulation encourages patients to actively participate in training because it facilitates locomotor recovery without the risk of adverse effects.

Keywords: Chronic stroke; Functional electrical stimulation; Robot-assisted gait training.

References

    1. Wagenaar RC, Beek WJ: Hemiplegic gait: a kinematic analysis using walking speed as a basis. J Biomech, 1992, 25: 1007–1015.
    1. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y: Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation. A challenge to rehabilitation strategies. Stroke, 1995, 26: 838–842.
    1. Granat MH, Maxwell DJ, Bosch CJ, et al. : A body-worn gait analysis system for evaluating hemiplegic gait. Med Eng Phys, 1995, 17: 390–394.
    1. Laufer Y, Dickstein R, Chefez Y, et al. : The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation: a randomized study. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2001, 38: 69–78.
    1. Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, et al. : Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clin Rehabil, 2007, 21: 17–27.
    1. Takami A, Wakayama S: Effects of partial body weight support while training acute stroke patients to walk backwards on a treadmill: a controlled clinical trial using randomized allocation. J Phys Ther Sci, 2010, 22: 177–187.
    1. Dobkin BH: Functional rewiring of brain and spinal cord after injury: the three Rs of neural repair and neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol, 2000, 13: 655–659.
    1. Schwartz I, Sajin A, Fisher I, et al. : The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. PM R, 2009, 1: 516–523.
    1. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, et al. : Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2005, 12: 22–35.
    1. Hornby TG, Zemon DH, Campbell D: Robotic-assisted, body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther, 2005, 85: 52–66.
    1. Pereira S, Mehta S, McIntyre A, et al. : Functional electrical stimulation for improving gait in persons with chronic stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2012, 19: 491–498.
    1. Yan T, Hui-Chan CW, Li LS: Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke, 2005, 36: 80–85.
    1. Park CS, Kang KY: The effects of additional action observational training for functional electrical stimulation treatment on weight bearing, stability and gait velocity of hemiplegic patients. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1173–1175.
    1. Husemann B, Müller F, Krewer C, et al. : Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke, 2007, 38: 349–354.
    1. Waters RL, McNeal DR, Faloon W, et al. : Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve for hemiplegia. Long-term clinical follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1985, 67: 792–793.
    1. Loewen SC, Anderson BA: Reliability of the modified motor assessment scale and the barthel index. Phys Ther, 1988, 68: 1077–1081.
    1. Bogle Thorbahn LD, Newton RA: Use of the Berg Balance Test to predict falls in elderly persons. Phys Ther, 1996, 76: 576–583, discussion 584–585.
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1991, 39: 142–148.
    1. Yavuzer G, Oken O, Elhan A, et al. : Repeatability of lower limb three-dimensional kinematics in patients with stroke. Gait Posture, 2008, 27: 31–35.
    1. Mayr A, Kofler M, Saltuari L: [ARMOR: an electromechanical robot for upper limb training following stroke. A prospective randomised controlled pilot study]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, 2008, 40: 66–73.
    1. Harris-Love ML, Macko RF, Whitall J, et al. : Improved hemiparetic muscle activation in treadmill versus overground walking. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2004, 18: 154–160.
    1. Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, et al. : Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 2002, 33: 553–558.
    1. Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS: Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87: 1298–1304.
    1. Hesse S, Konrad M, Uhlenbrock D: Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 80: 421–427.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit