Incorporating Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) Into Usual Care Reduces Acute Migraine Medication Use: An Open-Label Extension Study

Michael J Marmura, Tamar Lin, Dagan Harris, Alon Ironi, Noah L Rosen, Michael J Marmura, Tamar Lin, Dagan Harris, Alon Ironi, Noah L Rosen

Abstract

Background: A recent randomized controlled study showed that 66.7% (66/99) and 37.4% (37/99) of people undergoing remote electrical neuromodulation (REN), a novel non-pharmacological migraine treatment, achieve pain relief and pain freedom, respectively, at 2 h post-treatment. The participants who completed the 6-weeks double-blind phase of this study were offered to participate in an open-label extension (OLE) with an active REN device. Objective: This study investigated the clinical use of REN, focusing on its potential in reducing the use of acute migraine medications. Methods: The parent study for this open-label extension (OLE) was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of acute treatment conducted on 296 participants enrolled at 12 sites in the USA and Israel. This study included a run-in phase, in which migraine attacks were treated with usual care, and an 8-weeks double-blind treatment phase. One hundred sixty participants continued in an 8-weeks OLE phase in which they could incorporate a REN device into their usual care. Medication use rate (percentage of participants who treated their attacks only with REN and avoided medications in all their attacks) and pain outcomes at 2 h post-treatment were compared between the OLE and the run-in phase in a within-subject design. Results: The analyses were performed on 117 participants with episodic migraine. During the OLE, 89.7% of the participants treated their attacks only with REN and avoided medications in all their attacks compared with 15.4% in the run-in phase (p < 0.0001). The rates of pain relief and pain-free in at least 50% of the treatments at 2 h post-treatment were comparable (pain relief: 58.1% in the run-in phase and 57.3% in the OLE, p = 0.999; pain-free: 23.1% in the run-in vs. 30.8% in the OLE, p = 0.175). Conclusions: REN may reduce the use of acute migraine medications. Thus, incorporating REN into usual care may reduce the risk for medication overuse headache (MOH). Future studies should evaluate whether REN reduces the use of acute migraine medications in a population at risk for MOH.

Keywords: acute treatment; conditioned pain modulation; medication overuse headache; migraine; neuromodulation; remote electrical neuromodulation.

Copyright © 2020 Marmura, Lin, Harris, Ironi and Rosen.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment of participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of attacks treated with different types of acute pharmacological treatments in the run-in phase. A total of 22 of the 404 attacks were excluded from this analysis since the medication type was not specified (participants reported “other” in medication type). AAC, aspirin, acetaminophen, and caffeine; APAP, acetaminophen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of medication use patterns. The percentage of participants who treated their attacks only with REN and avoided medications in all their reported attacks in the open-label extension phase (black) compared with the run-in phase (gray). *p < 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of clinical pain outcomes. (A) The percentage of participants achieving pain relief at 2 h post-treatment in a least 50% of their treatments in the open-label extension phase (black) compared with the run-in phase (gray). (B) The percentage of participants achieving pain freedom at 2 h post-treatment in a least 50% of their treatments in the open-label extension phase (black) compared with the run-in phase (gray).

References

    1. De Felice M, Ossipov MH, Porreca F. Update on medication-overuse headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. (2011) 15:79–83. 10.1007/s11916-010-0155-1
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:1–211. 10.1177/0333102417738202
    1. Meng ID, Dodick D, Ossipov MH, Porreca F. Pathophysiology of medication overuse headache: insights and hypotheses from preclinical studies. Cephalalgia. (2011) 31:851–60. 10.1177/0333102411402367
    1. May A, Schulte LH. Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. (2016) 12:455–64. 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.93
    1. Diener H-C, Holle D, Solbach K, Gaul C. Medication-overuse headache: risk factors, pathophysiology, and management. Nat Rev Neurol. (2016) 12:575–583. 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.124
    1. Kristoffersen ES, Lundqvist C. Medication-overuse headache: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Ther Adv Drug Saf. (2014) 5:87–99. 10.1177/2042098614522683
    1. Olesen J. Detoxification for medication overuse headache is the primary task. Cephalalgia. (2012) 32:420–2. 10.1177/0333102411431309
    1. Matsuzawa Y, Lee YSC, Fraser F, Langenbahn D, Shallcross A, Powers S, et al. . Barriers to behavioral treatment adherence for headache: an examination of attitudes, beliefs, and psychiatric factors. Headache J Head Face Pain. (2019) 59:19–31. 10.1111/head.13429
    1. Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Saper JR, Aurora SK, Pearlman SH, et al. . Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. (2010) 9:373–80. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70054-5
    1. Chou DE, Shnayderman Yugrakh M, Winegarner D, Rowe V, Kuruvilla D, et al. . Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): a randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:3–14. 10.1177/0333102418811573
    1. Tassorelli C, Grazzi L, de Tommaso M, Pierangeli G, Martelletti P, Rainero I, et al. . Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation as acute therapy for migraine: the randomized PRESTO study. Neurology. (2018) 91:e364–73. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005857
    1. Cameron C, Kelly S, Hsieh S-C, Murphy M, Chen L, Kotb A, et al. . Triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Headache J Head Face Pain. (2015) 55:221–35. 10.1111/head.12601
    1. Yarnitsky D, Volokh L, Ironi A, Weller B, Shor M, Shifrin A, et al. . Non-painful remote electrical stimulation alleviates episodic migraine pain. Neurology. (2017) 88:1250–5. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003760
    1. Nir R-R, Yarnitsky D. Conditioned pain modulation. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. (2015) 9:131–7. 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000126
    1. Yarnitsky D, Dodick DW, Grosberg BM, Burstein R, Ironi A, Harris D, et al. . Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) relieves acute migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Headache J Head Face Pain. 59:1240–52. 10.1111/head.13551
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) . The international classification of headache disorders (beta version). Cephalalgia. (2013) 33:629–808. 10.1177/0333102413485658
    1. Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM. What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache J Head Face Pain. (2002) 42:3–9. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.0420s1003.x
    1. Spierings EL, Brandes JL, Kudrow DB, Weintraub J, Schmidt PC, Kellerman DJ, et al. . Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of ADAM zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:215–24. 10.1177/0333102417737765
    1. Diener H-C, Barbanti P, Dahlöf C, Reuter U, Habeck J, Podhorna J. BI 44370 TA, an oral CGRP antagonist for the treatment of acute migraine attacks: results from a phase II study. Cephalalgia. (2010) 31:573–84. 10.1177/0333102410388435
    1. Kelman L. Pain characteristics of the acute migraine attack. Headache J Head Face Pain. (2006) 46:942–53. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00443.x
    1. Tepper SJ. Medication-overuse headache. Contin Lifelong Learn Neurol. (2012) 18:807–22. 10.1212/01.CON.0000418644.32032.7b
    1. Fritsche G, Frettlöh J, Hüppe M, Dlugaj M, Matatko N, Gaul C, et al. . Prevention of medication overuse in patients with migraine. Pain. (2010) 151:404–13. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.032
    1. Messali AJ, Yang M, Gillard P, Tsai K, Tepper SJ, Bloudek LM, et al. . Treatment persistence and switching in triptan users: a systematic literature review. Headache J Head Face Pain. (2014) 54:1120–30. 10.1111/head.12404
    1. Rapoport AM, Bonner JH, Lin T, Harris D, Gruper Y, Ironi A, et al. . Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine: a comparison with usual care and acute migraine medications. J Headache Pain. (2019) 20:83. 10.1186/s10194-019-1033-9
    1. Penzien DB, Irby MB, Smitherman TA, Rains JC, Houle TT. Well-established and empirically supported behavioral treatments for migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. (2015) 19:34. 10.1007/s11916-015-0500-5
    1. Lipton RB, Munjal S, Alam A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, et al. . Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) study: baseline study methods, treatment patterns, and gender differences. Headache J Head Face Pain. (2018) 58:1408–26. 10.1111/head.13407
    1. Schwedt TJ, Alam A, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Munjal S, Buse DC, et al. . Factors associated with acute medication overuse in people with migraine: results from the 2017 migraine in America symptoms and treatment (MAST) study. J Headache Pain. (2018) 19:38. 10.1186/s10194-018-0865-z

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit