Oral Microbiota Shift after 12-Week Supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289; A Randomized Control Trial

Nelly Romani Vestman, Tsute Chen, Pernilla Lif Holgerson, Carina Öhman, Ingegerd Johansson, Nelly Romani Vestman, Tsute Chen, Pernilla Lif Holgerson, Carina Öhman, Ingegerd Johansson

Abstract

Background: Lactobacillus spp. potentially contribute to health by modulating bacterial biofilm formation, but their effects on the overall oral microbiota remain unclear.

Methods and findings: Oral microbiota was characterized via 454-pyrosequencing of the 16S rDNA hypervariable region V3-V4 after 12 weeks of daily Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289 consumption. Forty-four adults were assigned to a test group (n = 22) that received lactobacilli lozenges (108 CFU of each strain/lozenge) or a control group that received placebo (n = 22). Presence of L. reuteri was confirmed by cultivation and species specific PCR. Tooth biofilm samples from 16 adults before, during, and after exposure were analyzed by pyrosequencing. A total of 1,310,292 sequences were quality filtered. After removing single reads, 257 species or phylotypes were identified at 98.5% identity in the Human Oral Microbiome Database. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the most abundant phyla. Streptococcus was the most common genus and the S. oralis/S. mitis/S. mitis bv2/S. infantis group comprised the dominant species. The number of observed species was unaffected by L. reuteri exposure. However, subjects who had consumed L. reuteri were clustered in a principal coordinates analysis relative to scattering at baseline, and multivariate modeling of pyrosequencing microbiota, and culture and PCR detected L. reuteri separated baseline from 12-week samples in test subjects. L. reuteri intake correlated with increased S. oralis/S. mitis/S. mitis bv2/S. infantis group and Campylobacter concisus, Granulicatella adiacens, Bergeyella sp. HOT322, Neisseria subflava, and SR1 [G-1] sp. HOT874 detection and reduced S. mutans, S. anginosus, N. mucosa, Fusobacterium periodicum, F. nucleatum ss vincentii, and Prevotella maculosa detection. This effect had disappeared 1 month after exposure was terminated.

Conclusions: L. reuteri consumption did not affect species richness but induced a shift in the oral microbiota composition. The biological relevance of this remains to be elucidated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02311218.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Test and placebo lozenges were obtained from the manufacturer BioGaia AB (Lund, Sweden). The supplier had no role in the study design or implementation, data analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow chart diagram.
Fig 1. Flow chart diagram.
Number of study participants and samples analyzed in the test and placebo groups at each sampling occasion.
Fig 2. Rarefaction curves of baseline operational…
Fig 2. Rarefaction curves of baseline operational taxonomic unit prevalence rates according to the number of reads.
Comparisons include all 15 subjects at baseline. Red dots indicate subjects in the placebo group; blue dots indicate subjects in the test group.
Fig 3. Relative abundances of 9 identified…
Fig 3. Relative abundances of 9 identified bacterial phyla in 45 plaque samples.
Sequences were matched to Human Oral Microbiome Database using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) for phylum-level taxonomic identification. Data are presented as stacked bars and phyla are ordered by decreasing abundance and stratified by study group and sample occasion (i.e., baseline, 12-week exposure, and 1-month follow-up).
Fig 4. Rarefaction curves of operational taxonomic…
Fig 4. Rarefaction curves of operational taxonomic unit prevalence rates according to the number of reads in the test and placebo groups.
Data are presented as means with standard errors. Comparisons include 8 subjects in the placebo-treated group by sampling occasion (red symbols) and 7 subjects in the test group by sampling occasion (blue symbols). Differences within or between the groups were not statistically significant.
Fig 5. PCoA clustering analysis of baseline…
Fig 5. PCoA clustering analysis of baseline and 12-week samples in the placebo group.
Red dots indicate baseline samples and blue dots 12 week samples.
Fig 6. PCoA clustering analysis of baseline…
Fig 6. PCoA clustering analysis of baseline and 12-week samples in the test group.
Green dots indicate baseline samples and yellow dots 12 week samples.
Fig 7. Partial least-squares analysis (PLS) of…
Fig 7. Partial least-squares analysis (PLS) of microbiota associated with 12 weeks consumption of L. reuteri.
(A) Scatter-loading plot illustrating clustering of baseline versus 12 week treatment samples from the test group; The scores t1 and t2 are the new PCA created variables summarizing the x-variables. The red dots indicate placebo samples and blue dots test samples. The oval circle illustrates the tolerance ellipse based on Hotelling´s of T2, any observation located outside of the elipse would be an outlier. (B) Loading plot illustrating taxa associated with baseline versus 12 week treatment in the test group. The PLS model employed test and placebo group allocation as y and pyrosequencing taxa, L. reuteri and S. mutans by cultivation and PCR as the x-block. Red triangles indicate taxa associated with the baseline microbiota in the test group and blue triangles those associated with the microbiota after 12 week treatment in the same group. Black symbols indicate variables that were non-influential in the projection.
Fig 8. PCoA clustering analysis of 12-week…
Fig 8. PCoA clustering analysis of 12-week and 1 month follow-up samples in the test group.
Yellow dots indicate baseline samples and green dots 1 month follow-up samples.

References

    1. Kolenbrander PE. Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54: 413–437.
    1. Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu MH et al. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 2010;192: 5002–5017. 10.1128/JB.00542-10
    1. Stamatova I, Meurman JH. Probiotics: health benefits in the mouth. Am J Dent. 2009;22: 329–338.
    1. Heller KJ. Probiotic bacteria in fermented foods: product characteristics and starter organisms. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73: 374S–379S.
    1. Preidis GA, Versalovic J. Targeting the human microbiome with antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics: gastroenterology enters the metagenomics era. Gastroenterology. 2009;136: 2015–2031.
    1. Van Houte J. Bacterial specificity in the etiology of dental caries. Int. Dent J. 1980;30:305–326.
    1. Simark-Mattsson C, Emilson CG, Hakansson EG, Jacobsson C, Roos K, Holm S. Lactobacillus-mediated interference of mutans streptococci in caries-free vs. caries-active subjects. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007;115: 308–314.
    1. Kanasi E, Johansson I, Lu SC, Kressin NR, Nunn ME, Kent R Jr, et al. Microbial risk markers for childhood caries in pediatricians' offices. J Dent Res. 2010;89: 378–383. 10.1177/0022034509360010
    1. Holgerson PL, Vestman NR, Claesson R, Ohman C, Domellof M, Tanner AC, et al. Oral microbial profile discriminates breast-fed from formula-fed infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56: 127–136. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31826f2bc6
    1. Vestman NR, Timby N, Holgerson PL, Kressirer CA, Claesson R, Domellöf M, et al. Characterization and in vitro properties of oral lactobacilli in breastfed infants. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13: 193 10.1186/1471-2180-13-193
    1. Mitsuoka ET. The human gastrointestinal tract The Lactic Acid Bacteria Volume 1: Springer; 1992. pp. 69–114.
    1. Martin R, Langa S, Reviriego C, Jiminez E, Marin ML, Xaus J, et al. Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut. J Pediatr. 2003;143: 754–758.
    1. Reuter G. The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium microflora of the human intestine: composition and succession. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2001;2: 43–53.
    1. Rosander A, Connolly E, Roos S. Removal of antibiotic resistance gene-carrying plasmids from Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 and characterization of the resulting daughter strain, L. reuteri DSM 17938. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74: 6032–6040. 10.1128/AEM.00991-08
    1. Indrio F, Riezzo G, Raimondi F, Bisceglia M, Cavallo L, Francavilla R. The effects of probiotics on feeding tolerance, bowel habits, and gastrointestinal motility in preterm newborns. J Pediatr. 2008;152: 801–806. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.11.005
    1. Savino F, Pelle E, Palumeri E, Oggero R, Miniero R. Lactobacillus reuteri (American Type Culture Collection Strain 55730) versus simethicone in the treatment of infantile colic: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics. 2007;119: e124–130.
    1. Coccorullo P, Strisciuglio C, Martinelli M, Miele E, Greco L, Staiano A. Lactobacillus reuteri (DSM 17938) in infants with functional chronic constipation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Pediatr. 2010;157: 598–602. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.066
    1. Saulnier DM, Santos F, Roos S, Mistretta TA, Spinler JK, Molenaar D, et al. Exploring metabolic pathway reconstruction and genome-wide expression profiling in Lactobacillus reuteri to define functional probiotic features. PLoS One. 2011;6: e18783 10.1371/journal.pone.0018783
    1. Oh PL, Benson AK, Peterson DA, Patil PB, Moriyama EN, Roos S, et al. Diversification of the gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri as a result of host-driven evolution. ISME J. 2010;4: 377–387. 10.1038/ismej.2009.123
    1. Jones SE, Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiol 2009;9: 35 10.1186/1471-2180-9-35
    1. Jensen H, Grimmer S, Naterstad K, Axelsson L. In vitro testing of commercial and potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int Journal of Food Microbiol. 2012;153: 216–222. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.020
    1. Jalasvuori H, Haukioja A, Tenovuo J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri strains ATCC PTA 5289 and ATCC 55730 differ in their cariogenic properties in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:1633–1638. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.07.014
    1. McNulty NP, Yatsunenko T, Hsiao A, Faith JJ, Muegge BD, Goodman AL, et al. The impact of a consortium of fermented milk strains on the gut microbiome of gnotobiotic mice and monozygotic twins. Sci Transl Med. 2011;26:106ra106 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002701
    1. Caglar E, Kavaloglu SC, Kuscu OO, Sandalli N, Holgerson PL, Twetman S. Effect of chewing gums containing xylitol or probiotic bacteria on salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:425–429.
    1. Nikawa H, Makihira S, Fukushima H, Nishimura H, Ozaki Y, Ishida K, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri in bovine milk fermented decreases the oral carriage of mutans streptococci. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;95: 219–223.
    1. Cildir SK, Sandalli N, Nazli S, Alp F, Caglar E. A novel delivery system of probiotic drop and its effect on dental caries risk factors in cleft lip/palate children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49: 369–372. 10.1597/10-035
    1. Keller MK, Hasslof P, Dahlen G, Stecksen-Blicks C, Twetman S. Probiotic supplements (Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 5289) do not affect regrowth of mutans streptococci after full-mouth disinfection with chlorhexidine: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Caries Res. 2012;46: 140–146. 10.1159/000337098
    1. Ronaghi M, Uhlen M, Nyren P. A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate. Science. 1998;281: 363–365.
    1. Chen T, Yu WH, Izard J, Baranova OV, Lakshmanan A, Dewhirst FE. The Human Oral Microbiome Database: a web accessible resource for investigating oral microbe taxonomic and genomic information. Database (Oxford) 2010: baq013.
    1. Zaura E, Keijser BJ, Huse SM, Crielaard W. Defining the healthy "core microbiome" of oral microbial communities. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9: 259 10.1186/1471-2180-9-259
    1. Wade WG. The oral microbiome in health and disease. Pharmacol Res. 2013;69:137–143. 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.11.006
    1. Saxelin M, Lassig A, Karjalainen H, Tynkkynen S, Surakka A, Vapaatalo H, et al. Persistence of probiotic strains in the gastrointestinal tract when administered as capsules, yoghurt, or cheese. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;144: 293–300. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.009
    1. Yli-Knuuttila H, Snall J, Kari K, Meurman JH. Colonization of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the oral cavity. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;21: 129–131.
    1. Romani Vestman N, Hasslof P, Keller MK, Granstrom E, Roos S, Twetman S, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri influences regrowth of mutans streptococci after full-Mouth disinfection: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Caries Res. 2013;47: 338–345. 10.1159/000347233
    1. Lif Holgerson P, Harnevik L, Hernell O, Tanner AC, Johansson I. Mode of birth delivery affects oral microbiota in infants. J Dent Res. 2011;90:1183–1188. 10.1177/0022034511418973
    1. Nossa CW, Oberdorf WE, Yang L, Aas JA, Paster BJ, Desantis TZ, et al. Design of 16S rRNA gene primers for 454 pyrosequencing of the human foregut microbiome. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16: 4135–4144.
    1. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7: 335–336. 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
    1. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72: 5069–5072.
    1. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 2460–2461. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
    1. Chao A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J stat. 1984;265–270.
    1. Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, Knight R. Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1576–1585.
    1. Bylesjö M, Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Nicholson JK, Holmes E. OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS‐DA and SIMCA classification. J Chemom. 2006;20: 341–351.
    1. Sjöström M, Wold S, Söderström B. PLS discriminant plots; 1986. Elsevier: Amsterdam: pp. 461–470.
    1. Koenig JE, Spor A, Scalfone N, Fricker AD, Stombaugh J, Knight R, et al. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108:4578–4585. 10.1073/pnas.1000081107
    1. Moal Liévin-Le, Servin A. Anti-Infective Activities of Lactobacillus Strains in the Human Intestinal Microbiota: from Probiotics to Gastrointestinal Anti-Infectious Biotherapeutic Agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:167–199. 10.1128/CMR.00080-13
    1. Voreades N, Kozil A, Weir TL. Diet and the development of the human intestinal microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2014;22:494.
    1. Taipale T, Pienihäkkinen K, Alanen P, Jokela J, Söderling E. Administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in early childhood: a post-trial effect on caries occurrence at four years of age. Caries Res. 2013;47:364–372. 10.1159/000348424
    1. Keller MK, Nøhr Larsen I, Karlsson I, Twetman S. Effect of tablets containing probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus reuteri) on early caries lesions in adolescents: a pilot study. Benef Microbes. 2014;5:403–407. 10.3920/BM2013.0089
    1. Haukioja A, Loimaranta V, Tenovuo J. Probiotic bacteria affect the composition of salivary pellicle and streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008;23:336–343. 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00435.x
    1. Marttinen AM, Haukioja AL, Keskin M, Söderling EM. Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri PTA 5289 and L. paracasei DSMZ16671 on the adhesion and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Curr Microbiol. 2013;67:193–199. 10.1007/s00284-013-0352-3
    1. Vestman NR, Timby N, Holgerson PL, Kressirer CA, Claesson R, Johansson I. Characterization and in vitro properties of oral lactobacilli in breastfed infants. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:193 10.1186/1471-2180-13-193
    1. Toiviainen A, Jalasvuori H, Lahti E, Gursoy U, Salminen S, Fontana M, et al. Impact of orally administered lozenges with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 on the number of salivary mutans streptococci, amount of plaque, gingival inflammation and the oral microbiome in healthy adults. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:77–83. 10.1007/s00784-014-1221-6
    1. Hallström H, Lindgren S, Yucel-Lindberg T, Dahlén G, Renvert S, Twetman S. Effect of probiotic lozenges on inflammatory reactions and oral biofilm during experimental gingivitis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:828–833. 10.3109/00016357.2012.734406
    1. Keijser BJ, Zaura E, Huse SM, van der Vossen JM, Schuren FH, Montijn SC, et al. Pyrosequencing analysis of the oral microflora of healthy adults. J Dent Res. 2008;87: 1016–1020.
    1. Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Campbell JH, Firestone ND, Kumar PS, Yang ZK, et al. Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. ISME J. 2012;6: 1176–1185. 10.1038/ismej.2011.191
    1. Naser SM, Dawyndt P, Hoste B, Gevers D, Vandemeulebroecke K, Cleenwerck I, et al. Identification of lactobacilli by pheS and rpoA gene sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57: 2777–2789.
    1. Park HK, Yoon JW, Shin JW, Kim JY, Kim W. rpoA is a useful gene for identification and classification of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the closely related viridans group streptococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;305: 58–64. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01913.x
    1. Zaura E. Next-generation sequencing approaches to understanding the oral microbiome. Adv Dent Res. 2012;24: 81–85. 10.1177/0022034512449466
    1. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, Robert C, et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18: 1185–1193. 10.1111/1469-0691.12023
    1. Pinto AJ, Raskin L. PCR biases distort bacterial and archaeal community structure in pyrosequencing datasets. PLoS One. 2012;7: e43093 10.1371/journal.pone.0043093
    1. Lazarevic V, Gaïa N, Girard M, François P, Schrenzel J. Comparison of DNA extraction methods in analysis of salivary bacterial communities. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67699 10.1371/journal.pone.0067699
    1. Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014;12:87 10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z
    1. Haukioja A, Yli-Knuuttila H, Loimaranta V, Kari K, Ouwehand AC, Meurman JH, et al. Oral adhesion and survival of probiotic and other lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;21: 326–332.
    1. Meurman JH, Stamatova I. Probiotics: contributions to oral health. Oral Dis. 2007;13: 443–451.
    1. Iniesta M, Herrera D, Montero E, Zurbriggen M, Matos AR, Marín MJ, et al. Probiotic effects of orally administered Lactobacillus reuteri-containing tablets on the subgingival and salivary microbiota in patients with gingivitis. A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39: 736–744. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01914.x
    1. Loimaranta V, Jakubovics NS, Hytonen J, Finne J, Jenkinson HF, Strömberg N. Fluid- or surface-phase human salivary scavenger protein gp340 exposes different bacterial recognition properties. Infect Immun. 2005;73: 2245–2252.
    1. Uchida H, Kinoshita H, Kawai Y, Kitazawa H, Miura K, Shiiba K, et al. Lactobacilli binding human A-antigen expressed in intestinal mucosa. Res Microbiol. 2006;157: 659–665.
    1. Watanabe M, Kinoshita H, Huang IN, Eguchi K, Tsurumi T, Kawai Y, et al. An Adhesin-Like Protein, Lam29, from Lactobacillus mucosae ME-340 Binds to Histone H3 and Blood Group Antigens in Human Colonic Mucus. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76: 1655–1660.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit