Risankizumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, for ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, dose-finding phase 2 study

Dominique Baeten, Mikkel Østergaard, James Cheng-Chung Wei, Joachim Sieper, Pentti Järvinen, Lai-Shan Tam, Carlo Salvarani, Tae-Hwan Kim, Alan Solinger, Yakov Datsenko, Chandrasena Pamulapati, Sudha Visvanathan, David B Hall, Stella Aslanyan, Paul Scholl, Steven J Padula, Dominique Baeten, Mikkel Østergaard, James Cheng-Chung Wei, Joachim Sieper, Pentti Järvinen, Lai-Shan Tam, Carlo Salvarani, Tae-Hwan Kim, Alan Solinger, Yakov Datsenko, Chandrasena Pamulapati, Sudha Visvanathan, David B Hall, Stella Aslanyan, Paul Scholl, Steven J Padula

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods: A total of 159 patients with biological-naïve AS, with active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score of ≥4), were randomised (1:1:1:1) to risankizumab (18 mg single dose, 90 mg or 180 mg at day 1 and weeks 8, 16 and 24) or placebo over a 24-week blinded period. The primary outcome was a 40% improvement in Assessment in Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS40) at week 12. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug.

Results: At week 12, ASAS40 response rates were 25.5%, 20.5% and 15.0% in the 18 mg, 90 mg and 180 mg risankizumab groups, respectively, compared with 17.5% in the placebo group. The estimated difference in proportion between the 180 mg risankizumab and placebo groups (primary endpoint) was -2.5% (95% CI -21.8 to 17.0; p=0.42). Rates of adverse events were similar in all treatment groups.

Conclusions: Treatment with risankizumab did not meet the study primary endpoint and showed no evidence of clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in patients with active AS, suggesting that IL-23 may not be a relevant driver of disease pathogenesis and symptoms in AS.

Trial registration number: NCT02047110; Pre-results.

Keywords: DMARDs (biologic); ankylosing spondylitis; treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: DB reports grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, Novartis and Eli Lilly and part-time employment at UCB. MØ reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AbbVie, BMS, Merck, UCB and Novartis; grants and personal fees from Celgene; personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen, Pfizer and Roche; and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Regeneron, Orion and Hospira. JS reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. PJ reports grants from AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB and grants and personal fees from BMS and Pfizer. YD, CP, SV, DBH, SA, PS and SJP report being employees of Boehringer Ingelheim.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of study design and patient disposition. Overview of treatment and observation periods including escape and open-label extension phases (panel A); patients were randomised 1:1:1:1 to one of three regimens of risankizumab (18 mg single dose, 90 mg or 180 mg at  day 1 and weeks 8, 16 and 24) or placebo; patients without ASAS20 response at week 12 received escape treatment; patients with a flare of disease activity within 24 weeks of the last double-blind treatment entered the open-label extension. Arrows represent treatment administration. *Patients received 18 mg single dose at day 1 followed by placebo at weeks 8, 16 and 24. Trial profile (panel B). AE, adverse event; ASAS20, 20% improvement in Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society; DB, double blind; FU, follow-up; OLE, open-label extension; PV, protocol violation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response rates for ASAS40, ASAS20, ASAS 5/6 and ASAS partial remission during double-blind and escape treatment and follow-up periods. Clinical response rates over time for double-blind and escape treatment periods. ASAS40 (panel A), ASAS20 (panel B), ASAS 5/6 (panel C)  and partial remission (panel D). NRI was used for missing data. Number of patients entering the double-blind treatment were: placebo: n=40; 18 mg risankizumab: n=40; 90 mg risankizumab: n=39; and 180 mg risankizumab: n=40. Patients entering escape treatment received 180 mg risankizumab; responses shown for the escape period are by the original randomised treatment (placebo: n=26; 18 mg risankizumab: n=21; 90 mg risankizumab: n=23; 180 mg risankizumab: n=26). Values for all data points are provided in online supplementary tables S1–S4. ASAS, Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society; NRI, non-responder imputation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change from baseline in ASDAS-CRP, CRP and BASDAI over time to week 12. Change from baseline in ASDAS-CRP (panel A), CRP (mg/L) (panel B) and BASDAI (panel C) over time to week 12. Median (IQR) changes are shown (observed). The values under each plot are the number of patients per treatment arm with a valid measurement at the specified time point. *P=0.0229 and p=0.0101 for median change in ASDAS-CRP for 18 mg and 180 mg risankizumab, respectively, versus placebo at week 12. Values for all data points are provided in online supplementary  tables S5–S7. ASDAS-CRP, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-CRP; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; CRP, C reactive protein.

References

    1. Dougados M, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis. Lancet 2011;377:2127–37. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60071-8
    1. Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, et al. . Secukinumab, an interleukin-17A inhibitor, in ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2534–48. 10.1056/NEJMoa1505066
    1. Ward MM, Deodhar A, Akl EA, et al. . American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network 2015 Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:282–98. 10.1002/art.39298
    1. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, et al. . 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:978–91. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770
    1. Paine A, Ritchlin CT. Targeting the interleukin-23/17 axis in axial spondyloarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2016;28:359–67. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000301
    1. Reveille JD, Sims AM, Danoy P, et al. . Genome-wide association study of ankylosing spondylitis identifies non-MHC susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 2010;42:123–7. 10.1038/ng.513
    1. Burton PR, Clayton DG, Cardon LR, et al. . Association scan of 14,500 nonsynonymous SNPs in four diseases identifies autoimmunity variants. Nat Genet 2007;39:1329–37. 10.1038/ng.2007.17
    1. Sarin R, Wu X, Abraham C. Inflammatory disease protective R381Q IL23 receptor polymorphism results in decreased primary CD4+ and CD8+ human T-cell functional responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:9560–5. 10.1073/pnas.1017854108
    1. Appel H, Maier R, Bleil J, et al. . In situ analysis of interleukin-23- and interleukin-12-positive cells in the spine of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:1522–9. 10.1002/art.37937
    1. Kenna TJ, Davidson SI, Duan R, et al. . Enrichment of circulating interleukin-17-secreting interleukin-23 receptor-positive γ/δ T cells in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1420–9. 10.1002/art.33507
    1. Zhang L, Li YG, Li YH, et al. . Increased frequencies of Th22 cells as well as Th17 cells in the peripheral blood of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2012;7:e31000 10.1371/journal.pone.0031000
    1. Zeng L, Lindstrom MJ, Smith JA. Ankylosing spondylitis macrophage production of higher levels of interleukin-23 in response to lipopolysaccharide without induction of a significant unfolded protein response. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3807–17. 10.1002/art.30593
    1. Benham H, Rehaume LM, Hasnain SZ, et al. . Interleukin-23 mediates the intestinal response to microbial β-1,3-glucan and the development of spondyloarthritis pathology in SKG mice. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:1755–67. 10.1002/art.38638
    1. Sherlock JP, Joyce-Shaikh B, Turner SP, et al. . IL-23 induces spondyloarthropathy by acting on ROR-γt+ CD3+CD4-CD8- entheseal resident T cells. Nat Med 2012;18:1069–76. 10.1038/nm.2817
    1. Gaffen SL, Jain R, Garg AV, et al. . The IL-23-IL-17 immune axis: from mechanisms to therapeutic testing. Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14:585–600. 10.1038/nri3707
    1. Baeten D, Baraliakos X, Braun J, et al. . Anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab in treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:1705–13. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61134-4
    1. Baraliakos X, Borah B, Braun J, et al. . Long-term effects of secukinumab on MRI findings in relation to clinical efficacy in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis: an observational study. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:408–12. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207544
    1. Singh S, Kroe-Barrett RR, Canada KA, et al. . Selective targeting of the IL23 pathway: generation and characterization of a novel high-affinity humanized anti-IL23A antibody. MAbs 2015;7:778–91. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1032491
    1. Krueger JG, Ferris LK, Menter A, et al. . Anti-IL-23A mAb BI 655066 for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker results of a single-rising-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;136:116–24. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.018
    1. Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Bukhalo M, et al. . Risankizumab versus ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1551–60. 10.1056/NEJMoa1607017
    1. Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, D’Haens G, et al. . Induction therapy with the selective interleukin-23 inhibitor risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet 2017;389:1699–709. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30570-6
    1. Mease PJ, Kellner H, Morita A, et al. . Efficacy and safety results from a phase 2 trial of risankizumab, a selective IL-23p19 inhibitor, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69(Suppl 10).
    1. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8.
    1. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. . A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286–91.
    1. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, et al. . Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53:703–9. 10.1002/art.21445
    1. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, et al. . Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53:502–9. 10.1002/art.21337
    1. Machado P, Landewé R, Lie E, et al. . Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:47–53. 10.1136/ard.2010.138594
    1. Poddubnyy D, Hermann KG, Callhoff J, et al. . Ustekinumab for the treatment of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 28-week, prospective, open-label, proof-of-concept study (TOPAS). Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:817–23. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204248
    1. Gracey E, Qaiyum Z, Almaghlouth I, et al. . IL-7 primes IL-17 in mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, which contribute to the Th17-axis in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:2124–32. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208902
    1. Mangan PR, Su LJ, Jenny V, et al. . Dual inhibition of interleukin-23 and interleukin-17 offers superior efficacy in mouse models of autoimmunity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2015;354:152–65. 10.1124/jpet.115.224246
    1. Secukinumab Prescribing information. Highlights of prescribing information. (accessed 20 Feb 2018).

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit