Chronic migraine headache prevention with noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation: The EVENT study

Stephen D Silberstein, Anne H Calhoun, Richard B Lipton, Brian M Grosberg, Roger K Cady, Stefanie Dorlas, Kristy A Simmons, Chris Mullin, Eric J Liebler, Peter J Goadsby, Joel R Saper, EVENT Study Group, Anne H Calhoun, Roger K Cady, John Dexter, Stephen D Silberstein, William Young, Michael Marmura, Stephanie Nahas-Geiger, Arnaldo Da Silva, Joel Saper, James Weintraub, Alicia Prestegaard, Erik Sinka, Brian Grosberg, Sarah Vollbracht, Shirin Issa, Richard Lipton, Kathleen Mullin, Jelena Pavlovic, Matthew Robbins, Peter Goadsby, Amy Gelfand, Michael Eller, Stephen D Silberstein, Anne H Calhoun, Richard B Lipton, Brian M Grosberg, Roger K Cady, Stefanie Dorlas, Kristy A Simmons, Chris Mullin, Eric J Liebler, Peter J Goadsby, Joel R Saper, EVENT Study Group, Anne H Calhoun, Roger K Cady, John Dexter, Stephen D Silberstein, William Young, Michael Marmura, Stephanie Nahas-Geiger, Arnaldo Da Silva, Joel Saper, James Weintraub, Alicia Prestegaard, Erik Sinka, Brian Grosberg, Sarah Vollbracht, Shirin Issa, Richard Lipton, Kathleen Mullin, Jelena Pavlovic, Matthew Robbins, Peter Goadsby, Amy Gelfand, Michael Eller

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the prevention of chronic migraine (CM) attacks.

Methods: In this first prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study of nVNS in CM prophylaxis, adults with CM (≥15 headache d/mo) entered the baseline phase (1 month) and were subsequently randomized to nVNS or sham treatment (2 months) before receiving open-label nVNS treatment (6 months). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Efficacy endpoints in the intent-to-treat population included change in the number of headache days per 28 days and acute medication use.

Results: Fifty-nine participants (mean age, 39.2 years; mean headache frequency, 21.5 d/mo) were enrolled. During the randomized phase, tolerability was similar for nVNS (n = 30) and sham treatment (n = 29). Most adverse events were mild/moderate and transient. Mean changes in the number of headache days were -1.4 (nVNS) and -0.2 (sham) (Δ = 1.2; p = 0.56). Twenty-seven participants completed the open-label phase. For the 15 completers initially assigned to nVNS, the mean change from baseline in headache days after 8 months of treatment was -7.9 (95% confidence interval -11.9 to -3.8; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Therapy with nVNS was well-tolerated with no safety issues. Persistent prophylactic use may reduce the number of headache days in CM; larger sham-controlled studies are needed.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT01667250.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CM, nVNS is safe, is well-tolerated, and did not significantly change the number of headache days. This pilot study lacked the precision to exclude important safety issues or benefits of nVNS.

© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.

Figures

Figure 1. Participant disposition
Figure 1. Participant disposition
nVNS = noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation.
Figure 2. Effects of noninvasive vagus nerve…
Figure 2. Effects of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) on the change in number of headache days per 28 days
(A) Mean change in headache days per 28 days from baseline through the open-label phase (intent-to-treat population). Imputation for missing data was performed using the last observation carried forward. aReceived open-label nVNS after month 2. *p < 0.05 vs baseline. (B) Mean change in headache days per 28 days from baseline through the duration of nVNS treatment (per-protocol completer population). aThe 2-, 4-, and 6-month completers were from the 59 participants initially randomized to either nVNS or sham treatment. bThe 8-month completers were from the 30 participants initially randomized to nVNS treatment. cOne participant who completed 8 months of nVNS initiated gabapentin treatment during the study and was therefore excluded from 8-month completer analyses. *p < 0.05 vs baseline. **p < 0.01 vs baseline.
Figure 3. Participants who achieved a ≥50%…
Figure 3. Participants who achieved a ≥50% treatment response with noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) (per-protocol completer population)
aThe 2-, 4-, and 6-month completers were from the 59 participants initially randomized to either nVNS or sham treatment. bThe 8-month completers were from the 30 participants initially randomized to nVNS treatment. cOne participant who completed 8 months of nVNS initiated gabapentin treatment during the study and was therefore excluded from 8-month completer analyses.

References

    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33:629–808.
    1. Schwedt TJ. Chronic migraine. BMJ 2014;348:g1416.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Sprenger T. Current practice and future directions in the prevention and acute management of migraine. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:285–298.
    1. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. . OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30:793–803.
    1. Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. . OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30:804–814.
    1. Murphy JV. Left vagal nerve stimulation in children with medically refractory epilepsy: The Pediatric VNS Study Group. J Pediatr 1999;134:563–566.
    1. Aaronson ST, Carpenter LL, Conway CR, et al. . Vagus nerve stimulation therapy randomized to different amounts of electrical charge for treatment-resistant depression: acute and chronic effects. Brain Stimul 2013;6:631–640.
    1. Lenaerts ME, Oommen KJ, Couch JR, Skaggs V. Can vagus nerve stimulation help migraine? Cephalalgia 2008;28:392–395.
    1. Mauskop A. Vagus nerve stimulation relieves chronic refractory migraine and cluster headaches. Cephalalgia 2005;25:82–86.
    1. Cecchini AP, Mea E, Tullo V, et al. . Vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant daily chronic migraine with depression: preliminary data. Neurol Sci 2009;30(suppl 1):S101–S104.
    1. Hord ED, Evans MS, Mueed S, Adamolekun B, Naritoku DK. The effect of vagus nerve stimulation on migraines. J Pain 2003;4:530–534.
    1. Sadler RM, Purdy RA, Rahey S. Vagal nerve stimulation aborts migraine in patient with intractable epilepsy. Cephalalgia 2002;22:482–484.
    1. Silberstein SD, Da Silva AN, Calhoun AH, et al. . Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for chronic migraine prevention in a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study (the EVENT study): report from the double-blind phase. Headache 2014;54:LBP19.
    1. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24(suppl 1):9–160.
    1. Olesen J, Bousser MG, Diener HC, et al. . New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2006;26:742–746.
    1. Bang H, Flaherty SP, Kolahi J, Park J. Blinding assessment in clinical trials: a review of statistical methods and a proposal of blinding assessment protocol. Clin Res Reg Aff 2010;27:42–51.
    1. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dodick DW. Operational diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine: expert opinion. Headache 2014;54:1258–1266.
    1. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Reed KL, et al. . Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: long-term results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia 2015;35:344–358.
    1. Gaul C, Diener HC, Silver N, et al. . Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for prevention and acute treatment of chronic cluster headache (PREVA): a randomized controlled study. Cephalalgia 2016;36:534–546.
    1. Broadbent HJ, van den Eynde F, Guillaume S, et al. . Blinding success of rTMS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in randomised sham-controlled trials: a systematic review. World J Biol Psychiatry 2011;12:240–248.
    1. Schoenen J, Vandersmissen B, Jeangette S, et al. . Migraine prevention with a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2013;80:697–704.
    1. Straube A, Ellrich J, Eren O, Blum B, Ruscheweyh R. Treatment of chronic migraine with transcutaneous stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagal nerve (auricular t-VNS): a randomized, monocentric clinical trial. J Headache Pain 2015;16:543.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Grosberg BM, Mauskop A, Cady R, Simmons KA. Effect of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation on acute migraine: an open-label pilot study. Cephalalgia 2014;34:986–993.
    1. Nesbitt AD, Marin JC, Tompkins E, Ruttledge MH, Goadsby PJ. Initial use of a novel noninvasive vagus nerve stimulator for cluster headache treatment. Neurology 2015;84:1249–1253.
    1. Chen SP, Ay I, Lopes de Morais A, et al. . Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cortical spreading depression. Pain 2016;157:797–805.
    1. Hoffmann TJ, Simon BJ, Zhang Y, Emala CW. Low voltage vagal nerve stimulation reduces bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs through catecholamine release. Neuromodulation 2012;15:527–536.
    1. Oshinsky ML, Murphy AL, Hekierski H Jr, Cooper M, Simon BJ. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as treatment for trigeminal allodynia. Pain 2014;155:1037–1042.
    1. Gaul C, Straube A, Reuter U, Morris J, Walker S, Diener HC. Cost-effectiveness analysis of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic cluster headache in Germany. Cephalalgia 2015;35:81.
    1. Botulinum toxin for chronic migraine. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2011;53:7–8.
    1. Khalil M, Zafar HW, Quarshie V, Ahmed F. Prospective analysis of the use of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) in the treatment of chronic migraine: real-life data in 254 patients from Hull, U.K. J Headache Pain 2014;15:54.
    1. Moscato D, Moscato FR. A survey of patient perceptions of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) therapy for acute migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 2015;35(suppl 6):PO016. Abstract.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit