Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Xinying Wu, Lun Li, Li He, Xinying Wu, Lun Li, Li He

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) of small-vessel coronary artery disease (SVD) is related to an increased risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST). The application of the drug-coated balloon (DCB) for patients with SVD remains controversial.

Objectives: Assess the outcomes of DCB in the treatment of SVD compared with DES in patients with SVD.

Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2020, reporting the outcomes of DCB versus DES in the treatment of SVD, was performed.

Results: Four RCTs with 1227 patients were included. The results indicated that DCB was associated with the decreased risk for myocardial infarction (MI) compared with the DES, but the difference showed no significance (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.03, P=0.06). And, there was no significant difference in death (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.17-3.43, P=0.72), cardiac death (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.74-4.98, P=0.18), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.51-1.28, P=0.36), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.66-2.52, P=0.46), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.61-1.38, P=0.69) between the DCB group and DES group.

Conclusion: Compared with DES, DCB was associated with a decreased risk of MI among patients with SVD, but the difference showed no significance. The application of DCB in SVD is associated with comparable outcomes of death, TVR, and MACE when compared with DES.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Xinying Wu et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias graph.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias summary.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plots comparing DCB with DES in MI, death, cardiac death, TVR, TLR, and MACE. DCB, drug-coated balloon; DES, drug-eluting stent; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; MI, myocardial infarction; TLR, target lesion revascularization; TVR, target vessel revascularization.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plots comparing DCB with DES in MI, TLR, and MACE (excluded PICCOLETO trial). MACE, major adverse cardiac events; MI, myocardial infarction; TLR, target lesion revascularization.

References

    1. Nestelberger T., Kaiser C., Jeger R., et al. Drug-coated balloons in cardiovascular disease: benefits, challenges, and clinical applications. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2020;17(2):201–211. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1714590.
    1. Harada Y., Colleran R., Pinieck S., et al. Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients treated with drug-coated balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis after coronary bifurcation stenting with a two-stent technique. EuroIntervention. 2017;12(17):2132–2139. doi: 10.4244/eij-d-16-00226.
    1. Windecker S., Kolh P., Alfonso F., et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroIntervention. 2015;10(9):1024–1094. doi: 10.4244/eijy14m09_01.
    1. Mohiaddin H., Wong T. D. F. K., Burke-Gaffney A., Bogle R. G. Drug-coated balloon-only percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Cardiology and Therapy. 2018;7(2):127–149. doi: 10.1007/s40119-018-0121-2.
    1. Akiyama T., Moussa I., Reimers B., et al. Angiographic and clinical outcome following coronary stenting of small vessels. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1998;32(6):1610–1618. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00444-6.
    1. Elezi S., Kastrati A., Neumann F.-J., Hadamitzky M., Dirschinger J., Schömig A. Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation. 1998;98(18):1875–1880. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.18.1875.
    1. Bauters C., Hubert E., Prat A., et al. Predictors of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1998;31(6):1291–1298. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00076-x.
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery. 2010;8(5):336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
    1. Higgins J. P. T., Altman D. G., Gotzsche P. C., et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(2) doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.d5928
    1. Cortese B., Micheli A., Picchi A., et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent during PCI of small coronary vessels, a prospective randomised clinical trial. The PICCOLETO study. Heart. 2010;96(16):1291–1296. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.195057.
    1. Latib A., Colombo A., Castriota F., et al. A randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(24):2473–2480. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020.
    1. Naganuma T., Latib A., Sgueglia G. A., et al. A 2-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels the BELLO study. International Journal of Cardiology. 2015;184:17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.080.
    1. Jeger R. V., Farah A., Ohlow M. A., et al. Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England) 2018;392(10150):849–856.
    1. Tang Y., Qiao S., Su X., et al. The effectiveness and safety of the RESTORE® drug-eluting balloon versus a drug-eluting stent for small coronary vessel disease: study protocol for a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology : JGC. 2018;15(7):469–475.
    1. Tian J., Tang Y. d., Qiao S., et al. Two-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter study comparing a drug-coated balloon with a drug-eluting stent in native small coronary vessels: the restore small vessel disease China trial. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2020;95(S1):587–597. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28705.
    1. Li M., Guo C., Lv Y. H., et al. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(21) doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000015622.e15622
    1. Biondi-Zoccai G., Moretti C., Abbate A., Sheiban I. Percutaneous coronary intervention for small vessel coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2010;11(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.04.007.
    1. Mauri L., Orav E. J., Kuntz R. E. Late loss in lumen diameter and binary restenosis for drug-eluting stent comparison. Circulation. 2005;111(25):3435–3442. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.513952.
    1. Ellis S. G., Popma J. J., Lasala J. M., et al. Relationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005;45(8):1193–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.063.
    1. Cortese B. The PICCOLETO study and beyond. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:K53–K56. doi: 10.4244/eijv7ska9.
    1. Severino P., D’Amato A., Pucci M., et al. Ischemic heart disease pathophysiology paradigms overview: from plaque activation to microvascular dysfunction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21 doi: 10.3390/ijms21218118.
    1. Aoki J., Tanabe K. Mechanisms of drug-eluting stent restenosis. Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. 2021;36(1):p. 23. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00734-7.
    1. Cortese B., di Palma G., Latini R. A., Elwany M., Orrego P. S., Seregni R. G. Immediate and short-term performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon during complex percutaneous coronary interventions. The FAtebenefratelli SIrolimus COated-balloon (FASICO) registry. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2017;18(7):487–491. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.03.025.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit