Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study

Zhihong Yang, Jiaen Liu, Gary S Collins, Shala A Salem, Xiaohong Liu, Sarah S Lyle, Alison C Peck, E Scott Sills, Rifaat D Salem, Zhihong Yang, Jiaen Liu, Gary S Collins, Shala A Salem, Xiaohong Liu, Sarah S Lyle, Alison C Peck, E Scott Sills, Rifaat D Salem

Abstract

Background: Single embryo transfer (SET) remains underutilized as a strategy to reduce multiple gestation risk in IVF, and its overall lower pregnancy rate underscores the need for improved techniques to select one embryo for fresh transfer. This study explored use of comprehensive chromosomal screening by array CGH (aCGH) to provide this advantage and improve pregnancy rate from SET.

Methods: First-time IVF patients with a good prognosis (age <35, no prior miscarriage) and normal karyotype seeking elective SET were prospectively randomized into two groups: In Group A, embryos were selected on the basis of morphology and comprehensive chromosomal screening via aCGH (from d5 trophectoderm biopsy) while Group B embryos were assessed by morphology only. All patients had a single fresh blastocyst transferred on d6. Laboratory parameters and clinical pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups.

Results: For patients in Group A (n = 55), 425 blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed via aCGH (7.7 blastocysts/patient). Aneuploidy was detected in 191/425 (44.9%) of blastocysts in this group. For patients in Group B (n = 48), 389 blastocysts were microscopically examined (8.1 blastocysts/patient). Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the morphology + aCGH group compared to the morphology-only group (70.9 and 45.8%, respectively; p = 0.017); ongoing pregnancy rate for Groups A and B were 69.1 vs. 41.7%, respectively (p = 0.009). There were no twin pregnancies.

Conclusion: Although aCGH followed by frozen embryo transfer has been used to screen at risk embryos (e.g., known parental chromosomal translocation or history of recurrent pregnancy loss), this is the first description of aCGH fully integrated with a clinical IVF program to select single blastocysts for fresh SET in good prognosis patients. The observed aneuploidy rate (44.9%) among biopsied blastocysts highlights the inherent imprecision of SET when conventional morphology is used alone. Embryos randomized to the aCGH group implanted with greater efficiency, resulted in clinical pregnancy more often, and yielded a lower miscarriage rate than those selected without aCGH. Additional studies are needed to verify our pilot data and confirm a role for on-site, rapid aCGH for IVF patients contemplating fresh SET.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic for patients randomized either to embryo assessment by standard morphology plus aCGH (A) or morphology alone (B). Withdrawals, deferrals and drop-outs for each group are circled in red. The total number of blastocysts associated with each group is circled in blue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative aCGH data obtained from human blastocysts via trophectoderm biopsy performed on post-fertilization day 5. While standard microscopy confirmed good morphology (Grade 5AA) for both blastocysts, ploidy status was not uniform. Using aCGH to screen embryos before fresh transfer, normal chromosomal status (46,XX) was verified in A, but not in B (45,XY,-12).

References

    1. Coetsier T, Dhont M. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who’s afraid of single embryo transfer? Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2663–2664. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2663.
    1. Ryan G, Sparks A, Sipe C, Syrop C, Dokras A, Van Voorthis B. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:354–360. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001.
    1. Zander-Fox DL, Tremellen K, Lane M. Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:406–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01324.x.
    1. Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Human Reprod Update. 2011;17:107–120. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq028.
    1. Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarrez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:551–555. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023.
    1. Racowsky C, Ohno-Machado L, Kim J, Biggers JD. Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day? Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2104–2113. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep198.
    1. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:520–524. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003.
    1. Hassold T, Hunt P. Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we knew. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21:703–708. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328332c6ab.
    1. Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Verlinsky Y. Frequency and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in human oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111:193–198. doi: 10.1159/000086889.
    1. Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A. Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:413–419. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.413.
    1. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:534–541. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1512.
    1. Munné S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:382–391.
    1. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Magli C, Gianaroli L, Cohen J, Warburton D. Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:638–643. doi: 10.1002/pd.957.
    1. Munné S, Chen S, Colls P, Garrisi J, Zheng X, Cekleniak N, Lenzi M, Hughes P, Fischer J, Garrisi M, Tomkin G, Cohen J. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:628–634. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61057-7.
    1. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, Debrock S, Amyere M, Vikkula M, Schuit F, Fryns JP, Verbeke G, D'Hooghe T, Moreau Y, Vermeesch JR. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577–583. doi: 10.1038/nm.1924.
    1. Wilton L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:33–41.
    1. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2849–2858. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh536.
    1. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, Hillensjö T, Nilsson L, Stevic J, Reismer E, Borg K, Wikland M, Bergh C. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2806–2812. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den217.
    1. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J, Rawlins M, Munné S. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.029.
    1. Masternbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoever HR. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067744.
    1. Masternbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:454–466. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr003.
    1. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, Williamson R. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:846–851. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199909)19:9<846::AID-PD657>;2-#.
    1. Wells D, Delhanty JDA. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:1055–1062. doi: 10.1093/molehr/6.11.1055.
    1. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, Ginsburg M, Maassarani G, Yakut T, Baltaci V, Kotze D, Unsal E. Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybridization [correction of hybridization] provides a highly reliable method for selecting “competent” embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:1033–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.108.
    1. Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2596–2608. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den287.
    1. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S. Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:814–817. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60410-5.
    1. Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, Ndukwe G, Kelada E, Thomton S, Jenner L, Cater E, Brown A, Garcia-Bernardo J. Live birth after polar body array comprehensive genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy – the future of IVF. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1006.e7–1006.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.055.
    1. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munné S. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:953–958. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010.
    1. Fioretino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Birricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iammarrone E, Gordon A, Pantos K. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1925–1935. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der082.
    1. Handyside AH. PGD and aneuploidy screening for 24 chromosome by genome-wide SNP analysis: seeing the wood and the trees. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:686–691. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.012.
    1. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munné S, Katz-faffe MG, Wells D. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1700–1706. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.015.
    1. Ly KD, Agarwal A, Nagy ZP. Preimplatation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:833–849. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9608-7.
    1. Sills ES, Schattman GL, Veeck LL, Liu HC, Prasad M, Rosenwaks Z. Characteristics of consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles among patients treated with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and human menopausal gonadotropin versus FSH alone. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:831–835. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00046-6.
    1. Yang Z, Salem S, Salem-Lyle S, Bayrak A, Salem RD. Trophectoderm cells derived from blastocyst biopsy are suitable for array CGH analysis of 24 chromosomes. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(Suppl 4):S23.
    1. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D. First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1560–1574. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der068.
    1. Sakkas D, Gardner DK. Noninvasive methods to assess embryo quality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:283–288. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169106.69881.3e.
    1. Rauch ER, Schattman GL, Christos PJ, Chicketano T, Rosenwaks Z. Embryonic heart rate as a predictor of first-trimester pregnancy loss in infertility patients after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2451–2454. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.026.
    1. van Peperstraten AM, Nelen WL, Hermens RP, Jansen L, Scheenjes E, Braat DD, Grol RP, Kremer JA. Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2036–2042. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den156.
    1. Hvidtjørn D, Grove J, Schendel D, Svaerke C, Schieve LA, Uldall P, Ernst E, Jacobsson B, Thorsen P. Multiplicity and early gestational age contribute to an increased risk of cerebral palsy from assisted conception: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2115–2123. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq070.
    1. Voelker R. Researchers in Canada call for policy to mandate single-embryo transfer in IVF. JAMA. 2011;305:1848. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.602.
    1. De Neubourg D, Gerris J, Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M. Impact of a restriction in the number of embryos transferred on the multiple pregnancy rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124:212–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.08.023.
    1. Karlström PO, Bergh C. Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2202–2207. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem120.
    1. van den Akker OB, Purewal S. Elective single-embryo transfer: persuasive communication strategies can affect choice in a young British population. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:838–850. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.022.
    1. de Lacey S, Davies M, Homan G, Briggs N, Norman RJ. Factors and perceptions that influence women's decisions to have a single embryo transferred. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:526–531. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60384-7.
    1. Leniaud L, Poncelet C, Porcher R, Martin-Pont B, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Hugues JN, Wolf JP, Sifer C. Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008;36:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.12.004.
    1. Walsh AP, Collins GS, Le Du M, Walsh DJ, Sills ES. Pre-treatment preferences and characteristics among patients seeking in vitro fertilisation. Reprod Health. 2009;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-21.
    1. Milne P, Cottell E, Allen C, Spillane H, Vasallo J, Wingfield M. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF–elective single embryo transfer (eSET) Ir Med J. 2010;103:9–11.
    1. Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Nicoletti A, Pontes A, Oliveira JB, Franco JG. Single-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live births in fresh IVF and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-36.
    1. Gelbaya TA, Tsoumpou I, Nardo LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:936–945. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003.
    1. McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, Gerris J, Kremer JA, Martikainen H, Mol BW, Norman RJ, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Tiitinen A, van Montfoort AP, van Peperstraten AM, Van Royen E, Bhattacharya S. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;341:c6945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6945.
    1. Roberts SA, McGowan L, Mark Hirst W, Vail A, Rutherford A, Lieberman BA, Brison DR. towardSET Collaboration. Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:569–575. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq352.
    1. De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, Coetsier T, Dhont M. Single embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rate reduction in IVF/ICSI: a 5-year appraisal. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:464–469. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62169-4.
    1. Criniti A, Thyer A, Chow G, Lin P, Klein N, Soules M. Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1613–1619. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.06.035.
    1. Koryntová D, Moosová M, Rezábek K, Pavelková I, Mára M. Single embryo transfer does not compromise the pregnancy rate in patients with good IVF/ICSI prognosis. Ceska Gynekol. 2005;70:435–439.
    1. Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomás C, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1632–1639. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep042.
    1. Leese B, Denton J. Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2010;13:28–34. doi: 10.3109/14647270903586364.
    1. Li M, DeUgarte CM, Surrey M, Danzer H, DeCherney A, Hill DL. Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1395–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.068.
    1. Moayeri SE, Allen RB, Brewster WR, Kim MH, Porto M, Werlin LB. Day-3 embryo morphology predicts euploidy among older subjects. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.169.
    1. Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Mercader A, Mateu E, Buendía P, Pehlivan T, Viloria T, De los Santos MJ, Simón C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:748–756. doi: 10.1002/pd.1773.
    1. Schoolcraft WB, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Ferry K, Katz-Jaffe M, Scott RT. Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:638–640. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.049.
    1. Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, Gysler M, Hemmings R, Cheung AP, Goodrow GJ, Senikas V, Wong BC, Sierra S, Carranza-Mamane B, Case A, Dwyer C, Graham J, Havelock J, Lee F, Liu K, Vause T. Joint Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada-Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–377.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit