Optimal dose determination of enerisant (TS-091) for patients with narcolepsy: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

Yuichi Inoue, Makoto Uchiyama, Hideo Umeuchi, Koichi Onishi, Hiroki Ogo, Iwao Kitajima, Isao Matsushita, Izumi Nishino, Naohisa Uchimura, Yuichi Inoue, Makoto Uchiyama, Hideo Umeuchi, Koichi Onishi, Hiroki Ogo, Iwao Kitajima, Isao Matsushita, Izumi Nishino, Naohisa Uchimura

Abstract

Background: The histamine H3 receptor has emerged as one of the most promising targets of novel pharmacotherapy for narcolepsy. Studies now aim to investigate the optimal dose of enerisant, a novel H3 antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy.

Methods: We conducted two phase 2, fixed-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with narcolepsy. The first phase 2 study (Study 1) was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of enerisant at dosages of 25, 50, and 100 mg/day administered for 3 weeks based on the results of a phase 1 study conducted on healthy volunteers. The primary endpoint was mean sleep latency in maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT), and the secondary endpoint was the total score on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The dosages of enerisant in the second phase 2 study (Study 2) were set at 5 and 10 mg/day based on the simulation of receptor occupancy results from positron emission tomography study.

Results: Forty-six and fifty-three patients were randomized in Study 1 and Study 2, respectively. The efficacy of enerisant was partially confirmed in Study 1 with ESS; however, the doses were not tolerated, and there were many withdrawals due to adverse events (mainly insomnia, headache, and nausea). The doses in Study 2 were well tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events in Study 2 than in Study 1, although the efficacy could not be confirmed with MWT and ESS in Study 2.

Conclusions: The optimal dose of enerisant could not be determined in these two studies. Although enerisant has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, it is thought to have large interindividual variabilities in terms of efficacy and safety, suggesting the necessity of tailored dosage adjustments.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03267303 ; Registered 30 August 2017 (Study 2). Japic identifier: JapicCTI-142529 ; Registered 7 May 2014 (Study 1) and JapicCTI-173689 ; Registered 30 August 2017, https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/ShowDirect.jsp?clinicalTrialId=29277 (Study 2).

Keywords: Clinical trial; ESS; Enerisant; Histamine; MWT; Narcolepsy; TS-091.

Conflict of interest statement

Yuichi Inoue reports that he and his department have received research support (grants) from Philips Japan Co., Ltd. and KOIKE Medical Co., Ltd.; in addition, he has provided speaking and consulting services to and received personal fees from Eisai Co., Ltd., provided speaking services and received personal fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., and MSD K.K.; and provided consulting services and received personal fees from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Makoto Uchiyama reports that he and his department have received grants from Astellas Pharma Inc., Eisai Co., Ltd., Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi S.A., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Yoshitomiyakuhin Corporation; in addition, he has provided consulting services and received personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kao Corporation, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., and Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Hideo Umeuchi, Koichi Onishi, Hiroki Ogo, Iwao Kitajima, Isao Matsushita, and Izumi Nishino are employees of Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Naohisa Uchimura reports receiving grants from Eisai Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; in addition, he has provided consulting services to and received personal fees from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design for Study 1 (a) and Study 2 (b)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Simulation of H3 receptor occupancy after enerisant administration. The time-course of histamine H3 receptor occupancy after a single oral administration of enerisant was simulated, and the time to maintain 90% of H3 receptor occupancy was calculated. In the simulation, pharmacokinetic data obtained from the enerisant single ascending dose study and the pharmacodynamics data obtained from the H3 receptor occupancy study of enerisant [9] were used. Phoenix WinNonlin (ver.6.2) and Microsoft Excel 2010 were used as the analysis software
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Disposition of subjects for Study 1 (a) and Study 2 (b)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Secondary endpoint outcomes: total ESS score changes in Study 1 and Study 2. 95% confidence interval

References

    1. Ozaki A, Inoue Y, Hayashida K, et al. Quality of life in patients with narcolepsy with cataplexy, narcolepsy without cataplexy, and idiopathic hypersomnia without long sleep time: comparison between patients on psychostimulants, drug-naïve patients and the general Japanese population. Sleep Med. 2012;13(2):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.07.014.
    1. Calik MW. Update on the treatment of narcolepsy: clinical efficacy of pitolisant. Nat Sci Sleep. 2017;9:127–133. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S103462.
    1. Esbenshade TA, Browman KE, Bitner RS, et al. The histamine H3 receptor: an attractive target for the treatment of cognitive disorders. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154(6):1166–1181. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.147.
    1. Lebois EP, Jones CK, Lindsley CW. The evolution of histamine H3 antagonists/inverse agonists. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11(6):648–660. doi: 10.2174/1568026611109060648.
    1. Barateau L, Dauvilliers Y. Recent advances in treatment for narcolepsy. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019;12:1756286419875622. doi: 10.1177/1756286419875622.
    1. Hino N, Marumo T, Kotani M, et al. A novel potent and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist enerisant: in vitro profiles, in vivo receptor occupancy, and wake-promoting and procognitive effects in rodents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2020;375(2):276–285. doi: 10.1124/jpet.120.000185.
    1. Riddy DM, Cook AE, Shackleford DM, et al. Drug-receptor kinetics and sigma-1 receptor affinity differentiate clinically evaluated histamine H3 receptor antagonists. Neuropharmacology. 2019;144:244–255. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.10.028.
    1. Terasaka S, Hachiuma K, Mano Y, et al. Drug–drug interaction potential and clinical pharmacokinetics of enerisant, a novel potent and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist. Xenobiotica. 2021;28:1–10. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2021.1918361.
    1. Kimura Y, Takahata K, Shimazaki T, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of histamine H3 receptor occupancy by enerisant: a human PET study with a novel H3 binding ligand, [11C]TASP457. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021 10.1007/s00259-021-05571-1 Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34651222.
    1. International Classification of Sleep Disorders . Diagnostic and coding manual. 2. Westchester: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2005.
    1. Inoue Y, Honda Y, Takahashi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of treatment with modafinil in Japanese patients with narcolepsy: results from double blind placebo-controlled study. Jpn J Sleep Med (Suiminiryo) 2007;1(4):85–97.
    1. Doghramji K, Mitler MM, Sangal RB, et al. A normative study of the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;103(5):554–562. doi: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00010-2.
    1. Bogan RK, Feldman N, Emsellem HA, et al. Effect of oral JZP-110 (ADX-N05) treatment on wakefulness and sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy. Sleep Med. 2015;16(9):1102–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.05.013.
    1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International Classification of Sleep Disorders (3rd ed.). Darien: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014.
    1. Sun H, MacLeod C, Mostoller K, et al. Early-stage comparative effectiveness: randomized controlled trial with histamine inverse agonist MK-7288 in excessive daytime sleepiness patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(12):1294–1302. doi: 10.1002/jcph.182.
    1. Randomized trial of modafinil for the treatment of pathological somnolence in narcolepsy. US modafinil in Narcolepsy Multicenter Study Group. Ann Neurol. 1998;43(1):88–97. doi: 10.1002/ana.410430115. PMID: 9450772.
    1. Arand D, Bonnet M, Hurwitz T, et al. The clinical use of the MSLT and MWT. Sleep. 2005;28(1):123–144. doi: 10.1093/sleep/28.1.123.
    1. Valko PO, Gavrilov YV, Yamamoto M, et al. Increase of histaminergic tuberomammillary neurons in narcolepsy. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(6):794–804. doi: 10.1002/ana.24019.
    1. Sangal RB, Mitler MM, Sangal JM. Subjective sleepiness ratings (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) do not reflect the same parameter of sleepiness as objective sleepiness (maintenance of wakefulness test) in patients with narcolepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110(12):2131–2135. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00167-4.
    1. Sauter C, Asenbaum S, Popovic R, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness in patients suffering from different levels of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. J Sleep Res. 2000;9(3):293–301. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2000.00211.x.
    1. Dauvilliers Y, Bassetti C, Lammers GJ, et al. Pitolisant versus placebo or modafinil in patients with narcolepsy: a double-blind, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(11):1068–1075. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70225-4.
    1. Fry JM. Treatment modalities for narcolepsy. Neurology. 1998;50(2):S43–S48. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.2_suppl_1.s43.
    1. Romigi A, Vitrani G, Lo Giudice T, et al. Profile of pitolisant in the management of narcolepsy: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:2665–2675. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S101145.PMID:30214155;PMCID:PMC6124464.
    1. Davis CW, Kallweit U, Schwartz JC, et al. Efficacy of pitolisant in patients with high burden of narcolepsy symptoms: pooled analysis of short-term, placebo-controlled studies. Sleep Med. 2021;81:210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.02.037.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit