Investigating Why and How Young Adults Use Protective Behavioral Strategies for Alcohol and Marijuana Use: Protocol for Developing a Randomized Controlled Trial

Melissa A Lewis, Dana M Litt, Anne M Fairlie, Jason R Kilmer, Emma Kannard, Raul Resendiz, Travis Walker, Melissa A Lewis, Dana M Litt, Anne M Fairlie, Jason R Kilmer, Emma Kannard, Raul Resendiz, Travis Walker

Abstract

Background: Young adulthood is associated with increased alcohol and marijuana use compared with other developmental periods. Alcohol and marijuana use place individuals at high risk for acute and long-term negative consequences. Despite the relatively large cross-sectional and longitudinal literature on protective behavioral strategies (PBS; behaviors that individuals can use to limit consequences and reduce substance use), little is known about why young adults choose to use PBS on specific occasions or why they might use PBS differently across occasions (ie, quality and consistency). There is significant room for improvement in the conceptualization, application, and understanding of PBS.

Objective: This study aims to develop a novel, brief web-based and SMS text messaging intervention, with input from young adults who use alcohol and marijuana, which addresses the extent to which motivations for PBS use and nonuse (marijuana or alcohol) and the quality of PBS use (the degree of effectiveness or degree of implementation) differ when using alcohol alone versus concurrently or simultaneously with marijuana.

Methods: This research will be conducted in 2 phases. Phase 1 will involve web-based focus groups (N=100) and cognitive interviews (N=10) to determine why young adults (aged 18-24 years) use or do not use specific PBS related to alcohol and marijuana use and elicit feedback on how motivations and the quality of PBS could be incorporated into a web-based and SMS text messaging PBS intervention as well as elicit feedback on developed intervention material. In phase 2, young adults (N=200; aged 18-24 years), who typically use alcohol and marijuana for at least 2 days per week, will be randomized to either the intervention or waitlist control group. The intervention will be brief, web-based, focusing on self-selected alcohol and marijuana PBS messages and motives for using alcohol- and marijuana-related PBS, and including intervention content delivered via SMS text messages 3 days a week (random day, Friday, and Saturday) over 8 consecutive weeks. All participants will report on PBS use, motivations for PBS use (and nonuse), quality of PBS use, and alcohol and marijuana use in morning surveys timed to occur the day after the intervention SMS text messages for those in the intervention group.

Results: Recruitment and enrollment for phase 1 began in January 2022. Recruitment for phase 2 is anticipated to begin in January 2023. Upon completion of the phase 2 pilot, we will examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effect sizes of the newly developed brief web-based and SMS text messaging intervention.

Conclusions: This study will provide an in-depth understanding of young adults' PBS use and has the potential to develop a more efficacious intervention for co-occurring or simultaneous alcohol and marijuana behaviors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04978129; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04978129.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/37106.

Keywords: alcohol use; intervention development; marijuana use; protective behavioral strategies; young adults.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Melissa A Lewis, Dana M Litt, Anne M Fairlie, Jason R Kilmer, Emma Kannard, Raul Resendiz, Travis Walker. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 19.04.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomized controlled trial workflow diagram. PBS: protective behavioral strategies.

References

    1. Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Miech RA, Patrick ME. Institute of Education Sciences. National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2019. [2022-01-10]. .
    1. Cleveland MJ, Mallett KA, White HR, Turrisi R, Favero S. Patterns of alcohol use and related consequences in non-college-attending emerging adults. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013;74(1):84–93. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.84.
    1. Hingson R, White A. New research findings since the 2007 surgeon general's call to action to prevent and reduce underage drinking: a review. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(1):158–69. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.158.
    1. White AM, MacInnes E, Hingson RW, Pan IJ. Hospitalizations for suicide-related drug poisonings and co-occurring alcohol overdoses in adolescents (ages 12-17) and young adults (ages 18-24) in the United States, 1999-2008: results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2013;43(2):198–212. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12008.
    1. Grant BF, Chou SP, Saha TD, Pickering RP, Kerridge BT, Ruan WJ, Huang B, Jung J, Zhang H, Fan A, Hasin DS. Prevalence of 12-month alcohol use, high-risk drinking, and DSM-IV alcohol use disorder in the United States, 2001-2002 to 2012-2013: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(9):911–23. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161. 2647079
    1. Grucza RA, Sher KJ, Kerr WC, Krauss MJ, Lui CK, McDowell YE, Hartz S, Virdi G, Bierut LJ. Trends in adult alcohol use and binge drinking in the early 21st-century United States: a meta-analysis of 6 national survey series. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42(10):1939–50. doi: 10.1111/acer.13859.
    1. Johnston LD, Miech RA, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. Monitoring the future: national survey results on drug use, 1975-2018: overview. Key findings on adolescent drug use. National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Dept of Health and Human Services. 2018. [2022-01-10]. .
    1. Karila L, Roux P, Rolland B, Benyamina A, Reynaud M, Aubin HJ, Lançon C. Acute and long-term effects of cannabis use: a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(25):4112–8. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990620.CPD-EPUB-55637
    1. Arria AM, Garnier-Dykstra LM, Caldeira KM, Vincent KB, Winick ER, O'Grady KE. Drug use patterns and continuous enrollment in college: results from a longitudinal study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013;74(1):71–83. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.71.
    1. Maggs JL, Staff J, Kloska DD, Patrick ME, O'Malley PM, Schulenberg J. Predicting young adult degree attainment by late adolescent marijuana use. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(2):205–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.028. S1054-139X(15)00218-9
    1. Brière FN, Fallu JS, Descheneaux A, Janosz M. Predictors and consequences of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use in adolescents. Addict Behav. 2011;36(7):785–8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.02.012.S0306-4603(11)00083-9
    1. Subbaraman MS, Kerr WC. Simultaneous versus concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis in the National Alcohol Survey. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39(5):872–9. doi: 10.1111/acer.12698.
    1. Egan KL, Cox MJ, Suerken CK, Reboussin BA, Song EY, Wagoner KG, Wolfson M. More drugs, more problems? Simultaneous use of alcohol and marijuana at parties among youth and young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;202:69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.07.003. S0376-8716(19)30212-1
    1. Patrick ME, Fairlie AM, Cadigan JM, Abdallah DA, Larimer ME, Lee CM. Daily motives for alcohol and marijuana use as predictors of simultaneous use among young adults. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019;80(4):454–61. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.454.
    1. Arterberry BJ, Treloar H, McCarthy DM. Empirical profiles of alcohol and marijuana use, drugged driving, and risk perceptions. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017;78(6):889–98. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.889.
    1. Lee CM, Cadigan JM, Patrick ME. Differences in reporting of perceived acute effects of alcohol use, marijuana use, and simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;180:391–4. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.029. S0376-8716(17)30470-2
    1. Lipperman-Kreda S, Gruenewald PJ, Grube JW, Bersamin M. Adolescents, alcohol, and marijuana: context characteristics and problems associated with simultaneous use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;179:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.023. S0376-8716(17)30347-2
    1. Sokolovsky AW, Gunn RL, Micalizzi L, White HR, Jackson KM. Alcohol and marijuana co-use: consequences, subjective intoxication, and the operationalization of simultaneous use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;212:107986. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107986. S0376-8716(20)30151-4
    1. White HR, Kilmer JR, Fossos-Wong N, Hayes K, Sokolovsky AW, Jackson KM. Simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use among college students: patterns, correlates, norms, and consequences. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(7):1545–55. doi: 10.1111/acer.14072.
    1. Yurasek AM, Merrill JE, Metrik J, Miller MB, Fernandez AC, Borsari B. Marijuana use in the context of alcohol interventions for mandated college students. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;79:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.015. S0740-5472(16)30543-8
    1. Martens MP, Taylor KK, Damann KM, Page JC, Mowry ES, Cimini MD. Protective behavioral strategies when drinking alcohol and their relationship to negative alcohol-related consequences in college students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2004;18(4):390–3. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.4.390.2004-21853-012
    1. Martens MP, Ferrier AG, Sheehy MJ, Corbett K, Anderson DA, Simmons A. Development of the protective behavioral strategies survey. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66(5):698–705. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.698.
    1. Pearson MR. Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies among college students: a critical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(8):1025–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.006. S0272-7358(13)00122-0
    1. Prince MA, Carey KB, Maisto SA. Protective behavioral strategies for reducing alcohol involvement: a review of the methodological issues. Addict Behav. 2013;38(7):2343–51. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.03.010.S0306-4603(13)00082-8
    1. Fairlie AM, Hultgren BA, Lewis MA, Lee CM. The link between planning and doing: daily-level associations between college students' plans for and use of alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021;35(5):577–86. doi: 10.1037/adb0000740.2021-35536-001
    1. Lewis MA, Patrick ME, Lee CM, Kaysen DL, Mittman A, Neighbors C. Use of protective behavioral strategies and their association to 21st birthday alcohol consumption and related negative consequences: a between- and within-person evaluation. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26(2):179–86. doi: 10.1037/a0023797. 2011-09195-001
    1. Lewis MA, Sheng E, Geisner IM, Rhew IC, Patrick ME, Lee CM. Friend or foe: personal use and friends' use of protective behavioral strategies and spring break drinking. Addict Behav. 2015;50:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.029. S0306-4603(15)00217-8
    1. Linden-Carmichael AN, Calhoun BH, Patrick ME, Maggs JL. University students use fewer protective behavioural strategies on high-intensity drinking days. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019;38(3):302–5. doi: 10.1111/dar.12913.
    1. Sell NM, Turrisi R, Scaglione NM, Cleveland MJ, Mallett KA. Alcohol consumption and use of sexual assault and drinking protective behavioral strategies: a diary study. Psychol Women Q. 2018;42(1):62–71. doi: 10.1177/0361684317744198.
    1. Fischer B, Russell C, Sabioni P, van den Brink W, Le Foll B, Hall W, Rehm J, Room R. Lower-risk cannabis use guidelines: a comprehensive update of evidence and recommendations. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):e1–12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303818.
    1. Pedersen ER, Hummer JF, Rinker DV, Traylor ZK, Neighbors C. Measuring protective behavioral strategies for marijuana use among young adults. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77(3):441–50. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.441.
    1. Bravo AJ, Anthenien AM, Prince MA, Pearson MR, Marijuana Outcomes Study Team Marijuana protective behavioral strategies as a moderator of the effects of risk/protective factors on marijuana-related outcomes. Addict Behav. 2017;69:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.007.S0306-4603(17)30008-4
    1. Bravo AJ, Prince MA, Pearson MR, Marijuana Outcomes Study Team Can I use marijuana safely? An examination of distal antecedents, marijuana protective behavioral strategies, and marijuana outcomes. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017;78(2):203–12. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.203.
    1. Pedersen ER, Huang W, Dvorak RD, Prince MA, Hummer JF, (The Marijuana Outcomes Study Team) The protective behavioral strategies for marijuana scale: further examination using item response theory. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(5):548–59. doi: 10.1037/adb0000271. 2017-30262-001
    1. Prince MA, Jenzer T, Brown W, Hetelekides EM, Mumm RA, Collins RL. Examining cannabis protective behavioral strategy use using multiple methods. Drugs Alcohol Today. 2019;19(4):295–305. doi: 10.1108/dat-10-2018-0061.
    1. Prince MA, Collins RL, Wilson SD, Vincent PC. A preliminary test of a brief intervention to lessen young adults' cannabis use: episode-level smartphone data highlights the role of protective behavioral strategies and exercise. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020;28(2):150–6. doi: 10.1037/pha0000301. 2019-29445-001
    1. Bravo AJ, Weinstein AP, Pearson MR, Protective Strategies Study Team The relationship between risk factors and alcohol and marijuana use outcomes among concurrent users: a comprehensive examination of protective behavioral strategies. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019;80(1):102–8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.102.
    1. Pearson MR, Bravo AJ, Conner BT, Parnes JE. A day in the life: a daily diary examination of marijuana motives and protective behavioral strategies among college student marijuana users. J Drug Issues. 2020;50(2):142–56. doi: 10.1177/0022042619890837.
    1. Pearson MR, D'Lima GM, Kelley ML. Daily use of protective behavioral strategies and alcohol-related outcomes among college students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(3):826–31. doi: 10.1037/a0032516. 2013-15111-001
    1. Reid AE, Carey KB. Interventions to reduce college student drinking: state of the evidence for mechanisms of behavior change. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;40:213–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.006. S0272-7358(15)00096-3
    1. Barnett NP, Murphy JG, Colby SM, Monti PM. Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. Addict Behav. 2007;32(11):2529–48. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.017. S0306-4603(07)00188-8
    1. Larimer ME, Lee CM, Kilmer JR, Fabiano PM, Stark CB, Geisner IM, Mallett KA, Lostutter TW, Cronce JM, Feeney M, Neighbors C. Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(2):285–93. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.285. 2007-04141-009
    1. Bravo AJ, Pearson MR, Stevens LE, Henson JM. Weighing the pros and cons of using alcohol protective behavioral strategies: a qualitative examination among college students. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(13):2190–8. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1464026.
    1. Graham G. Words, worlds, and addictions. Philos Psychiatr Psychol. 2015;22(1):45–7. doi: 10.1353/ppp.2015.0001.
    1. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101.
    1. Polen MR, Green CA, Perrin NA, Anderson BM, Weisner CM. Drinking patterns, gender and health I: attitudes and health practices. Addict Res Theory. 2010;18(2):122–42. doi: 10.3109/16066350903398486.
    1. Sell NM, Testa M. Is bringing one's own alcohol to parties protective or risky? A prospective examination of sexual victimization among first-year college women. J Am Coll Health. 2020:1–5. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1791883.
    1. Murphy JG, Dennhardt AA, Skidmore JR, Borsari B, Barnett NP, Colby SM, Martens MP. A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80(5):876–86. doi: 10.1037/a0028763. 2012-14231-001
    1. Riggs NR, Conner BT, Parnes JE, Prince MA, Shillington AM, George MW. Marijuana eCHECKUPTO GO: effects of a personalized feedback plus protective behavioral strategies intervention for heavy marijuana-using college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;190:13–9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.020.S0376-8716(18)30335-1
    1. Cadigan JM, Martens MP, Dworkin ER, Sher KJ. The efficacy of an event-specific, text message, personalized drinking feedback intervention. Prev Sci. 2019;20(6):873–83. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0939-9. 10.1007/s11121-018-0939-9
    1. Suffoletto B, Chung T, Muench F, Monti P, Clark DB. A text message intervention with adaptive goal support to reduce alcohol consumption among non-treatment-seeking young adults: non-randomized clinical trial with voluntary length of enrollment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8530. v6i2e35
    1. Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Larimer M. Preventing alcohol abuse in college students: a harm-reduction approach. In: Boyd GM, Howard J, Zucker RA, editors. Alcohol problems among adolescents: current directions in prevention research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1995. pp. 147–72.
    1. Marlatt GA, Larimer ME, Baer JS, Quigley LA. Harm reduction for alcohol problems: moving beyond the controlled drinking controversy. Behav Ther. 1993;24(4):461–503. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80314-4.
    1. Miller MB, Leffingwell T, Claborn K, Meier E, Walters S, Neighbors C. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(4):909–20. doi: 10.1037/a0031174. 2012-35005-001
    1. Lewis MA, Litt DM, King KM, Fairlie AM, Waldron KA, Garcia TA, LoParco C, Lee CM. Examining the ecological validity of the prototype willingness model for adolescent and young adult alcohol use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020;34(2):293–302. doi: 10.1037/adb0000533. 2019-70466-001
    1. Lewis MA, Patrick ME, Litt DM, Atkins DC, Kim T, Blayney JA, Norris J, George WH, Larimer ME. Randomized controlled trial of a web-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-related risky sexual behavior among college students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(3):429–40. doi: 10.1037/a0035550. 2014-03881-001
    1. Lewis MA, Cadigan JM, Cronce JM, Kilmer JR, Suffoletto B, Walter T, Lee CM. Developing text messages to reduce community college student alcohol use. Am J Health Behav. 2018;42(4):70–9. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.4.7.
    1. Mason M, Benotsch EG, Way T, Kim H, Snipes D. Text messaging to increase readiness to change alcohol use in college students. J Prim Prev. 2014;35(1):47–52. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0329-9.
    1. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future: national results on adolescent drug use: overview of key findings, 2011. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health. 2012. [2022-01-10]. .
    1. Collins RL, Parks GA, Marlatt GA. Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(2):189–200. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.53.2.189.
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. 2nd edition. World Health Organization. 2001. [2021-11-15]. .
    1. Read JP, Kahler CW, Strong DR, Colder CR. Development and preliminary validation of the young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire. J Stud Alcohol. 2006;67(1):169–77. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.169.
    1. Treloar H, Martens MP, McCarthy DM. The protective behavioral strategies scale-20: improved content validity of the serious harm reduction subscale. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(1):340–6. doi: 10.1037/pas0000071. 2014-57710-001
    1. Litt DM, Lewis MA. An examination of protective behavioral strategies, motivations for strategy selection, and alcohol use among young adults. Proceedings of the 50th Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies Annual Convention; ABCT '16; October 27-30, 2016; New York, NY. 2016.
    1. Heather N, Hönekopp J. A revised edition of the readiness to change questionnaire [treatment version] Addict Res Theory. 2008;16(5):421–33. doi: 10.1080/16066350801900321.
    1. Enhancing motivation for change in substance use disorder treatment: updated 2019 [internet] Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2019. .
    1. Lee CM, Kilmer JR, Neighbors C, Atkins DC, Zheng C, Walker DD, Larimer ME. Indicated prevention for college student marijuana use: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81(4):702–9. doi: 10.1037/a0033285. 2013-20189-001
    1. Simons JS, Dvorak RD, Merrill JE, Read JP. Dimensions and severity of marijuana consequences: development and validation of the Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (MACQ) Addict Behav. 2012;37(5):613–21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.01.008. S0306-4603(12)00009-3
    1. Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Fearer SA, Williams C, Picciano JF, Burke RS. The marijuana check-up: reaching users who are ambivalent about change. Addiction. 2004;99(10):1323–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00832.x.ADD832
    1. Adamson SJ, Kay-Lambkin FJ, Baker AL, Lewin TJ, Thornton L, Kelly BJ, Sellman JD. An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: the cannabis use disorders identification test-revised (CUDIT-R) Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;110(1-2):137–43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.017.S0376-8716(10)00094-3
    1. Brown SA, Myers MG, Lippke L, Tapert SF, Stewart DG, Vik PW. Psychometric evaluation of the customary drinking and drug use record (CDDR): a measure of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement. J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59(4):427–38. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.427.
    1. Schafer J, Brown SA. Marijuana and cocaine effect expectancies and drug use patterns. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(4):558–65. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.4.558.
    1. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future: national survey results on drug use 1975-2014: overview. Key findings on adolescent drug use. National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Dept of Health and Human Services. 2015. [2022-10-10]. .
    1. Brooke J. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL, editors. Usability evaluation in industry. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1996. pp. 189–94.
    1. Brooke J. SUS: a retrospective. J Usability Stud. 2013;8(2):29–40.
    1. Sauro J. A practical guide to the system usability scale: background, benchmarks, & best practices. Denver, CO: Measuring Usability; 2011.
    1. Kirakowski J, Claridge N. WAMMI: website analysis and measurement inventory questionnaire. Wammi. [2022-01-10].
    1. Lewis MA, Neighbors C. An examination of college student activities and attentiveness during a web-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Psychol Addict Behav. 2015;29(1):162–7. doi: 10.1037/adb0000003. 2014-33499-001
    1. Shrier LA, Burke PJ, Kells M, Scherer EA, Sarda V, Jonestrask C, Xuan Z, Harris SK. Pilot randomized trial of MOMENT, a motivational counseling-plus-ecological momentary intervention to reduce marijuana use in youth. Mhealth. 2018;4:29. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.07.04. doi: 10.21037/-04-2018.07.04
    1. Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Curtin L. Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(5):898–908.
    1. White HR, Labouvie EW, Papadaratsakis V. Changes in substance use during the transition to adulthood: a comparison of college students and their noncollege age peers. J Drug Issues. 2005;35(2):281–306. doi: 10.1177/002204260503500204.
    1. Linden-Carmichael AN, Van Doren N, Masters LD, Lanza ST. Simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use in daily life: implications for level of use, subjective intoxication, and positive and negative consequences. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020;34(3):447–53. doi: 10.1037/adb0000556. 2020-04174-001
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2013.
    1. Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010.
    1. Snijders TA, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2012.
    1. Atkins DC, Gallop RJ. Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: a tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21(4):726–35. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.726.2007-18728-018
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
    1. Planning alcohol interventions using NIAAA's College Alcohol Intervention Matrix (CollegeAIM) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 2019. [2021-11-15]. .
    1. Gaume J, McCambridge J, Bertholet N, Daeppen JB. Mechanisms of action of brief alcohol interventions remain largely unknown - a narrative review. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00108.
    1. Göritz AS. Using lotteries, loyalty points, and other incentives to increase participant response and completion. In: Gosling SD, Johnson JA, editors. Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association; 2010. pp. 219–33.
    1. Neighbors C, Rodriguez LM, Garey L, Tomkins MM. Testing a motivational model of delivery modality and incentives on participation in a brief alcohol intervention. Addict Behav. 2018;84:131–8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.03.030. S0306-4603(18)30232-6

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit