Assessment of wear and periacetabular osteolysis using dual energy computed tomography on a pig cadaver to identify the lowest acceptable radiation dose

B Sandgren, M Skorpil, P Nowik, H Olivecrona, J Crafoord, L Weidenhielm, A Persson, B Sandgren, M Skorpil, P Nowik, H Olivecrona, J Crafoord, L Weidenhielm, A Persson

Abstract

Objectives: Computed tomography (CT) plays an important role in evaluating wear and periacetabular osteolysis (PAO) in total hip replacements. One concern with CT is the high radiation exposure since standard pelvic CT provides approximately 3.5 millisieverts (mSv) of radiation exposure, whereas a planar radiographic examination with three projections totals approximately 0.5 mSv. The objective of this study was to evaluate the lowest acceptable radiation dose for dual-energy CT (DECT) images when measuring wear and periacetabular osteolysis in uncemented metal components.

Materials and methods: A porcine pelvis with bilateral uncemented hip prostheses and with known linear wear and acetabular bone defects was examined in a third-generation multidetector DECT scanner. The examinations were performed with four different radiation levels both with and without iterative reconstruction techniques. From the high and low peak kilo voltage acquisitions, polychrmoatic images were created together with virtual monochromatic images of energies 100 kiloelectron volts (keV) and 150 keV.

Results: We could assess wear and PAO while substantially lowering the effective radiation dose to 0.7 mSv for a total pelvic view with an accuracy of around 0.5 mm for linear wear and 2 mm to 3 mm for PAO.

Conclusion: CT for detection of prosthetic wear and PAO could be used with clinically acceptable accuracy at a radiation exposure level equal to plain radiographic exposures.Cite this article: B. Sandgren, M. Skorpil, P. Nowik, H. Olivecrona, J. Crafoord, L. Weidenhielm, A. Persson. Assessment of wear and periacetabular osteolysis using dual energy computed tomography on a pig cadaver to identify the lowest acceptable radiation dose. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:307-313. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.57.2000566.

Keywords: Accuracy; Low-dose dual-energy computed tomography; Osteolysis; Wear.

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE conflict of interest:None declared.

© 2016 Sandgren et al.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5005473/bin/bonejointres-05-307-g001.jpg
Measurement of periacetabular osteolysis (PAO) and wear. On the left side (image) the ‘osteolysis’ was connected to the acetabular central grove which made it difficult to define where the osteolysis began; a) PAO, left side depth; b) PAO, right side width.; c) wear on left side. The shortest distance between inner border of the component and head was measured.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Actual drilled depth and width measured from a plastic mould using a micrometer for the man-made periacetabular osteolysis. Drilled wear measured with a micrometer.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Box plots show the difference between the micrometer measurement and the observed measurment for each observer, for each trial designated as B1, B2 and M1 and M2. Caliper measurements of plastic casts (1, 2) : upper left: left osteolysis; 19 mm depth, upper right: right osteolysis, 24 mm width; lower left: left linear wear, 3.4 mm; lower right: right linear wear, 2.9 mm. Osteolysis on the left side was connected to the acetabular central groove which can explain the difference between measurements from BS and MS.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5005473/bin/bonejointres-05-307-g004.jpg
Images showing a) osteolysis accuracy: the difference in measurements for both observers compared with actual measured distances. There were too many missing values at 10% radiation levels for both observers, hence these results are not shown; b) wear accuracy: accuracy is between 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm for all measurements.

References

    1. Hallan G, Lie SA, Havelin LI. High wear rates and extensive osteolysis in 3 types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a review of the PCA, the Harris Galante and the Profile/Tri-Lock Plus arthroplasties with a minimum of 12 years median follow-up in 96 hips. Acta Orthop 2006;77:575-584.
    1. Puolakka TJ, Laine HJ, Moilanen TP, Koivisto AM, Pajamäki KJ. Alarming wear of the first-generation polyethylene liner of the cementless porous-coated Biomet Universal cup: 107 hips followed for mean 6 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:1-7.
    1. Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M, et al. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survivalstudies. Acta Orthop 2012;83:583-591.
    1. Leung S, Naudie D, Kitamura N, Walde T, Engh CA. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:592-597.
    1. Claus AM, Totterman SM, Sychterz CJ, et al. Computed tomography to assess pelvic lysis after total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;422:167-174.
    1. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679-1691.
    1. Sandgren B, Crafoord J, Garellick G, et al. Computed tomography vs. digital radiography assessment for detection of osteolysis in asymptomatic patients with uncemented cups: a proposal for a new classification system based on computer tomography. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1608-1613.
    1. Koch KM, Hargreaves BA, Pauly KB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:773-787.
    1. Koff MF, Shah P, Koch KM, Potter HG. Quantifying image distortion of orthopedic materials in magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:610-618.
    1. Koff MF, Shah P, Potter HG. Clinical implementation of MRI of joint arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:154-161.
    1. Waldstein W, Schmidt-Braekling T, Boettner F. MRI does not detect acetabular osteolysis around metal-on-metal Birmingham THA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014;134:1009-1015.
    1. Berrington de, González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004;363:345-351.
    1. No authors listed. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. (date last accessed 16 June 2016).[[bibmisc]]
    1. No authors listed. AAPM Report No. 96. The Measurement, Reporting and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. (date last accessed 16 June 2016).[[bibmisc]]
    1. No authors listed. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority SR. (date last accessed 5 April 2016).[[bibmisc]]
    1. Lee MJ, Kim S, Lee SA, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics 2007;27:791-803.
    1. Lewis M, Reid K, Toms AP. Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements. Skeletal Radiol 2013;42:275-282.
    1. Morsbach F, Bickelhaupt S, Wanner GA, et al. Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: value of iterative reconstructions. Radiology 2013;268:237-244.
    1. Stradiotti P, Curti A, Castellazzi G, Zerbi A. Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J 2009;18(Suppl 1):102-108.
    1. Winklhofer S, Benninger E, Spross C, et al. CT metal artefact reduction for internal fixation of the proximal humerus: value of mono-energetic extrapolation from dual-energy and iterative reconstructions. Clin Radiol 2014;69:e199-e206.
    1. Vande Berg B, Malghem J, Maldague B, Lecouvet F. Multi-detector CT imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient with metal hardware. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:470-479.
    1. Link TM, Berning W, Scherf S, et al. CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:165-172.
    1. Fishman EK, Magid D, Robertson DD, et al. Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology 1986;160:675-681.
    1. Pessis E, Campagna R, Sverzut JM, et al. Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. Radiographics 2013;33:573-583.
    1. Grant KL, Flohr TG, Krauss B, et al. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media. Invest Radiol 2014;49:586-592.
    1. Yang WJ, Yan FH, Liu B, et al. Can sinogram-affirmed iterative (SAFIRE) reconstruction improve imaging quality on low-dose lung CT screening compared with traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013;37:301-305.
    1. Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, et al. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003;38:769-775.
    1. Boas FE, Fleischmann D. Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology 2011;259:894-902.
    1. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:764-771.
    1. Hardie AD, Tipnis SV, Rieter WJ, Rissing MS, De Cecco CN. Physician preference between low-dose computed tomography with a sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm and routine-dose computed tomography with filtered back projection in abdominopelvic imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013;37:932-936.
    1. Newell JD, Jr, Fuld MK, Allmendinger T, et al. Very low-dose (0.15 mGy) chest CT protocols using the COPDGene 2 test object and a third-generation dual-source CT scanner with corresponding third-generation iterative reconstruction software. Invest Radiol 2015;50:40-45.
    1. Ranstam J, Ryd L, Onsten I. Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:106-108.
    1. Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 2008;248:995-1003.
    1. Gurung J, Khan MF, Maataoui A, et al. Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1898-1905.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit