Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update

Janet E Squires, Carole A Estabrooks, Petter Gustavsson, Lars Wallin, Janet E Squires, Carole A Estabrooks, Petter Gustavsson, Lars Wallin

Abstract

Background: Interventions that have a better than random chance of increasing nurses' use of research are important to the delivery of quality patient care. However, few reports exist of successful research utilization in nursing interventions. Systematic identification and evaluation of individual characteristics associated with and predicting research utilization may inform the development of research utilization interventions.

Objective: To update the evidence published in a previous systematic review on individual characteristics influencing research utilization by nurses.

Methods: As part of a larger systematic review on research utilization instruments, 12 online bibliographic databases were searched. Hand searching of specialized journals and an ancestry search was also conducted. Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational study designs examining the association between individual characteristics and nurses' use of research were eligible for inclusion. Studies were limited to those published in the English, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian languages. A vote counting approach to data synthesis was taken.

Results: A total of 42,770 titles were identified, of which 501 were retrieved. Of these 501 articles, 45 satisfied our inclusion criteria. Articles assessed research utilization in general (n = 39) or kinds of research utilization (n = 6) using self-report survey measures. Individual nurse characteristics were classified according to six categories: beliefs and attitudes, involvement in research activities, information seeking, education, professional characteristics, and socio-demographic/socio-economic characteristics. A seventh category, critical thinking, emerged in studies examining kinds of research utilization. Positive relationships, at statistically significant levels, for general research utilization were found in four categories: beliefs and attitudes, information seeking, education, and professional characteristics. The only characteristic assessed in a sufficient number of studies and with consistent findings for the kinds of research utilization was attitude towards research; this characteristic had a positive association with instrumental and overall research utilization.

Conclusions: This review reinforced conclusions in the previous review with respect to positive relationships between general research utilization and: beliefs and attitudes, and current role. Furthermore, attending conferences/in-services, having a graduate degree in nursing, working in a specialty area, and job satisfaction were also identified as individual characteristics important to research utilization. While these findings hold promise as potential targets of future research utilization interventions, there were methodological problems inherent in many of the studies that necessitate their findings be replicated in further research using more robust study designs and multivariate assessment methods.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of articles for review.

References

    1. Estabrooks CA, Wallin L, Milner M. Measuring knowledge utilization in health care. International Journal of Policy Analysis & Evaluation. 2003;1:3–36.
    1. Estabrooks CA. The conceptual structure of research utilization. Research in Nursing and Health. 1999;22(3):203–216. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199906)22:3<203::AID-NUR3>;2-9.
    1. Stetler C. Research utilization: Defining the concept. Image:The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1985;17:40–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1985.tb01415.x.
    1. Estabrooks CA. Will Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Make Practice Perfect? Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 1998;30(1):15–36.
    1. English I. Nursing as a research based profession: 22 years after Briggs. British Journal of Nursing. 1994;3(8):402–406.
    1. Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Mitchell A. PhD Thesis. University of Toronto: Faculty of Nursing; 1998. Dissemination and use of research evidence for policy and practice by nurses: A model of development and implementation strategies.
    1. Veeramah V. Utilization of research findings by graduate nurses and midwives. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;47(2):183–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03077.x.
    1. Larsen K, Adamsen L, Bjerregaard L, Madsen L. There is no gap 'per se' between theory and practice: Research knowledge and clinical knowledge are developed in different contexts and follow their own logic. Nursing Outlook. 2002;50(5):204–212. doi: 10.1067/mno.2002.127724.
    1. Allmark P. A classical view of the theory-practice gap in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995;22(1):18–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010018.x.
    1. Fealy G. The theory-practice relationship in nursing: An exploration of contemporary discourse. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997;25(5):1061–1069. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251061.x.
    1. Bircumshaw D. The utilization of research findings in clinical nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1990;15:1272–1280. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01742.x.
    1. Rodgers SE. The extent of nursing research utilization in general medical and surgical wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;32(1):182–193. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01416.x.
    1. Parahoo K. Barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;31(1):89–98. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01256.x.
    1. Squires JE, Moralejo D, LeFort SM. Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses. Implementation Science. 2007;2(1) doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-17.
    1. Wallin L. Knowledge translation and implementation research in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009;46:576–587. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.006.
    1. Thompson DS, Estabrooks CA, Scott-Findlay S, Moore K, Wallin L, Thompson DS, Estabrooks CA, Scott-Findlay S, Moore K, Wallin L. Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review. Implementation Science. 2007;2:15. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-15.
    1. Estabrooks CA, Floyd JA, Scott-Findlay S, O'Leary KA, Gushta M. Individual determinants of research utilization: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;43(5):506–520. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02748.x.
    1. Squires J, Estabrooks C, Wallin L, Gustavsson P. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments used to measure knowledge translation in healthcare professionals technical report. Edmonton, Alberta: Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta; 2009.
    1. De Vet HCW, De Bie RA, Van Der Heijden GJMG, Verhagen AP, Sijpkes P, Knipschild PG. Systematic reviews on the basis of methodological criteria. Physiotherapy. 1997;83(6):284–289. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66175-5.
    1. Cummings G, Estabrooks C. The effects of hospital restructuring that included layoffs on individual nurses who remained employed: A systematic report of impact. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 2003;8:8–53. doi: 10.1108/01443330310790633.
    1. Estabrooks C, Cummings G, Olivo S, Squires J, Gibin C, Simpson N. Effects of shift length on quality of patient care and health provider outcomes: systematic review. Quality and Safety in Healthcare. 2009;18:181–188. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024232.
    1. Khan K, Ter Riet G, Popay J, Nixon J, Kleijnen J, Satge I. Undertaking systematic reviews of research effectiveness CDC's guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. Centre of Reviews and Dissemination UoY; 2001. Conducting the review: Phase 5 study quality assessment; pp. 1–20.
    1. Kmet L, Lee R, Cook L. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2004. pp. 1–22.
    1. Jackson N, Waters E. Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions. Health Promotion International. 2005;20(4):367–374. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai022.
    1. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2003;7(27)
    1. Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, Grilli R, Oxman AD, Ramsay C, Vale L, Zwarenstein M. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2003;12(4):298–303.
    1. Levels of Evidence.
    1. Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw G. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Science. 2008;3(36)
    1. McCleary L, Brown GT. Use of the Edmonton research orientation scale with nurses. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2002;10(3):263–275. doi: 10.1891/jnum.10.3.263.52559.
    1. McCleary L, Brown GT. Association between nurses' education about research and their reseach use. Nurse Education Today. 2003;23(8):556–565. doi: 10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00084-4.
    1. Estabrooks CA. Modeling the individual determinants of research utilization. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1999;21(6):758–772. doi: 10.1177/01939459922044171.
    1. Estabrooks CA, Kenny DJ, Adewale AJ, Cummings GG, Mallidou AA. A comparison of research utilization among nurses working in Canadian civilian and United States Army healthcare settings. Research in Nursing and Health. 2007;30(3):282–296. doi: 10.1002/nur.20218.
    1. McCloskey DJ. PhD Thesis. George Mason University; 2005. The relationship between organizational factors and nurse factors affecting the conduct and utilization of nursing research.
    1. McCloskey DJ, McCloskey DJ. Nurses' perceptions of research utilization in a corporate health care system. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2008;40(1):39–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00204.x.
    1. Parahoo K. A comparison of pre-Project 2000 and Project 2000 nurses' perceptions of their research training, research needs and of their use of research in clinical areas. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;29(1):237–245. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00882.x.
    1. Parahoo K, McCaughan EM. Research utilization among medical and surgical nurses: A comparison of their self reports and perceptions of barriers and facilitators. Journal of Nursing Management. 2001;9(1):21–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2001.00237.x.
    1. Bostrom J, Suter WN. Research utilization: making the link to practice. Journal of Nursing Staff Development. 1993;9(1):28–34.
    1. Kirchhoff KT. A diffusion survey of coronary precautions. Nursing Research. 1982;31(4):196–201. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198207000-00002.
    1. Davies BL. Dissertation/Thesis. University of Toronto (Canada); 1999. Evaluation of two strategies for the transfer of research results about labour support and electronic fetal monitoring into practice.
    1. Winter JC. Brief: relationship between sources of knowledge and use of research findings. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1990;21(3):138–140.
    1. Lia-Hoagberg B, Schaffer M, Strohschein S. Public health nursing practice guidelines: an evaluation of dissemination and use. Public Health Nursing. 1999;16(6):397–404. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.1999.00397.x.
    1. Brett JL. Organizational integrative mechanisms and adoption of innovations by nurses. Nursing Research. 1989;38(2):105–110.
    1. Parahoo K. Research utilization and attitudes towards research among psychiatric nurses in Northern Ireland. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 1999;6(2):125–135. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.1999.620125.x.
    1. Brett JL. Use of nursing practice research findings. Nursing Research. 1987;36(6):344–349.
    1. Barta KM. Information-seeking, research utilization, and barriers to research utilization of pediatric nurse educators. Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 1995;11(1):49–57.
    1. Berggren A. Swedish midwives' awareness of, attitudes to and use of selected research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996;23(3):462–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00007.x.
    1. Coyle LA, Sokop AG. Innovation adoption behavior among nurses. Nursing Research. 1990;39(3):176–180. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199005000-00016.
    1. Michel Y, Sneed NV. Dissemination and use of research findings in nursing practice. Journal of Professional Nursing. 1995;11(5):306–311. doi: 10.1016/S8755-7223(05)80012-2.
    1. Rutledge DN, Greene P, Mooney K, Nail LM, Ropka M. Use of research-based practices by oncology staff nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1996;23(8):1235–1244.
    1. Champion VL, Leach A. Variables related to research utilization in nursing: an empirical investigation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1989;14(9):705–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01634.x.
    1. Bostrom AM, Kajermo KN, Nordstrom G, Wallin L. Barriers to research utilization and research use among registered nurses working in the care of older people: Does the BARRIERS Scale discriminate between research users and non-research users on perceptions of barriers? Implementation Science. 2008;3(1)
    1. Hatcher S, Tranmer J. A survey of variables related to research utilization in nursing practice in the acute care setting. Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration. 1997;10(3):31–53.
    1. Humphris D, Hamilton S, O'Halloran P, Fisher S, Littlejohns P. Do diabetes nurse specialists utilise research evidence? Practical Diabetes International. 1999;16(2):47–50. doi: 10.1002/pdi.1960160213.
    1. Lacey EA. Research utilization in nursing practice -- a pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1994;19(5):987–995. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01178.x.
    1. Nash MA. PhD Thesis. Gonzaga University; 2005. Research utilization among Idaho nurses.
    1. Prin PL, Mills MD, Gerdin U. Nursing informatics: the impact of nursing knowledge on health care informatics proceedings of NI'97, Sixth Triennial International Congress of IMIA-NI, Nursing Informatics of International Medical Informatics Association. Vol. 46. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press; 1997. Nurses' MEDLINE usage and research utilization; pp. 451–456.
    1. Tranmer JE, Lochhaus-Gerlach J, Lam M. The effect of staff nurse participation in a clinical nursing research project on attitude towards, access to, support of and use of research in the acute care setting. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership. 2002;15(1):18–26.
    1. Wallin L, Bostrom A, Wikblad K, Ewald U. Sustainability in changing clinical practice promotes evidence-based nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;41(5):509–518. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02574.x.
    1. Bonner A, Sando J. Examining the knowledge, attitude and use of research by nurses. Journal of Nursing Management. 2008;16(3):334–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00808.x.
    1. Stiefel KA. Dissertation/Thesis. University of South Carolina; 1996. Career commitment, nursing unit culture, and nursing research utilization.
    1. Varcoe C, Hilton A. Factors affecting acute-care nurses' use of research findings. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 1995;27(4):51–71.
    1. Forbes SA, Bott MJ, Taunton RL. Control over nursing practice: a construct coming of age. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 1997;5(2):179–190.
    1. Kenny DJ. Nurses' use of research in practice at three US Army hospitals. Canadian journal of nursing leadership. 2005;18(3):45–67.
    1. Profetto-McGrath J, Hesketh KL, Lang S, Estabrooks CA. A study of critical thinking and research utilization among nurses. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25(3):322–337. doi: 10.1177/0193945902250421.
    1. Profetto-McGrath J, Smith KB, Hugo K, Patel A, Dussault B. Nurse educators' critical thinking dispositions and research utilization. Nurse Education in Practice. 2009;9(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2008.06.003.
    1. Connor N. MN Thesis. Dalhousie University (Canada); 2007. The relationship between organizational culture and research utilization practices among nursing home departmental staff.
    1. Milner FM, Estabrooks CA, Humphrey C. Clinical nurse educators as agents for change: increasing research utilization. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2005;42(8):899–914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.11.006.
    1. Cummings GG, Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Wallin L, Hayduk L. Influence of organizational characteristics and context on research utilization. Nurs Res. 2007;56(4 Suppl):S24–39. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280629.63654.95.
    1. Wallin L, Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Cummings GG. Development and validation of a derived measure of research utilization by nurses. Nursing Research. 2006;55(3):149–160. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200605000-00001.
    1. Brown DS. Nursing education and nursing research utilization: is there a connection in clinical settings? Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1997;28(6):258–262. quiz 284.
    1. Butler L. Valuing research in clinical practice: a basis for developing a strategic plan for nursing research. The Canadian journal of nursing research. 1995;27(4):33–49.
    1. Wells N, Baggs JG. A survey of practicing nurses' research interests and activities. Clinical Nurse Specialist: The Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice. 1994;8(3):145–151. doi: 10.1097/00002800-199405000-00009.
    1. Ofi B, Sowunmi L, Edet D, Anarado N, Ofi B, Sowunmi L, Edet D, Anarado N. Professional nurses' opinion on research and research utilization for promoting quality nursing care in selected teaching hospitals in Nigeria. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2008;14(3):243–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00684.x.
    1. Tsai S. Nurses' participation and utilization of research in the Republic of China. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2000;37(5):435–444. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00023-7.
    1. Tsai S. The effects of a research utilization in-service program on nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2003;40(2):105–113. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00036-6.
    1. Erler CJ, Fiege AB, Thompson CB. Flight nurse research activities. Air Medical Journal. 2000;19(1):13–18. doi: 10.1016/S1067-991X(00)90086-5.
    1. Logsdon C, Davis DW, Hawkins B, Parker B, Peden A. Factors related to research utilization by registered nurses in Kentucky. Kentucky Nurse. 1998;46(1):23–26.
    1. Wright A, Brown P, Sloman R. Nurses' perceptions of the value of nursing research for practice. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996;13(4):15–18.
    1. Facione N, Facione P, Sanchez C. Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgement: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education. 1994;33(8):345–350.
    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
    1. Estabrooks C. A program of research in knowledge translation. Nursing Research. 2007;56(Supplement):S4–S5. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280637.24644.fd.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit