Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice

J Coste, G Delecoeuillerie, A Cohen de Lara, J M Le Parc, J B Paolaggi, J Coste, G Delecoeuillerie, A Cohen de Lara, J M Le Parc, J B Paolaggi

Abstract

Objective: To describe the natural course of recent acute low back pain in terms of both morbidity (pain, disability) and absenteeism from work and to evaluate the prognostic factors for these outcomes.

Design: Inception cohort study.

Setting: Primary care.

Patients: 103 patients with acute localised non-specific back pain lasting less than 72 hours.

Main outcome measures: Complete recovery (disappearance of both pain and disability) and return to work.

Results: 90% of patients recovered within two weeks and only two developed chronic low back pain. Only 49 of 100 patients for whom data were available had bed rest and 40% of 75 employed patients lost no time from work. Proportional hazards regression analysis showed that previous chronic episodes of low back pain, initial disability level, initial pain worse when standing, initial pain worse when lying, and compensation status were significantly associated with delayed episode recovery. These factors were also related to absenteeism from work. Absenteeism from work was also influenced by job satisfaction and gender.

Conclusions: The recovery rate from acute low back pain was much higher than reported in other studies. Those studies, however, did not investigate groups of patients enrolled shortly after the onset of symptoms and often mixed acute low back pain patients with patients with exacerbations of chronic pain or sciatica. Several sociodemographic and clinical factors were of prognostic value in acute low back pain. Factors which influenced the outcome in terms of episode recovery (mainly physical severity factors) were only partly predictive of absenteeism from work. Time off work and return to work depended more on sociodemographic and job related influences.

References

    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Sep;8(6):635-42
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Dec;15(12):1307-10
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1233-45
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Nov;(200):266-78
    1. J Rheumatol. 1988 Oct;15(10):1557-64
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Jul-Aug;7(4):398-402
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 Sep;28(9):1066-70
    1. N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 23;315(17):1064-70
    1. Can Med Assoc J. 1966 Jul 9;95(2):50-6
    1. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1984 Dec;70(6):614-7
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6):605-7
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Jun;32(239):352-6
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Nov-Dec;8(8):880-4
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Apr;16(4):426-8
    1. Br Med J. 1966 Oct 1;2(5517):824
    1. BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):901-9
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 22;284(6328):1519-23
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981 Jan-Feb;6(1):53-60
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Nov;11(9):951-4
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980 Jul-Aug;5(4):324-30
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Nov;30(11):1247-53
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Feb 12;286(6364):523-5
    1. N Engl J Med. 1988 Feb 4;318(5):291-300
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Apr;31(225):209-16

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit