Identification and initial response to children's exposure to intimate partner violence: a qualitative synthesis of the perspectives of children, mothers and professionals

Natalia V Lewis, Gene S Feder, Emma Howarth, Eszter Szilassy, Jill R McTavish, Harriet L MacMillan, Nadine Wathen, Natalia V Lewis, Gene S Feder, Emma Howarth, Eszter Szilassy, Jill R McTavish, Harriet L MacMillan, Nadine Wathen

Abstract

Objectives: To synthesise evidence on the acceptable identification and initial response to children's exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) from the perspectives of providers and recipients of healthcare and social services.

Design: We conducted a thematic synthesis of qualitative research, appraised the included studies with the modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and undertook a sensitivity analysis of the studies scored above 15.

Data sources: We searched eight electronic databases, checked references and citations and contacted authors of the included studies.

Eligibility criteria: We included qualitative studies with children, parents and providers of healthcare or social services about their experiences of identification or initial responses to children's exposure to IPV. Papers that have not been peer-reviewed were excluded as well as non-English papers.

Results: Searches identified 2039 records; 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Integrated perspectives of 42 children, 212 mothers and 251 professionals showed that sufficient training and support for professionals, good patient-professional relationship and supportive environment for patient/clients need to be in place before enquiry/disclosure of children's exposure to IPV should occur. Providers and recipients of care favour a phased enquiry about IPV initiated by healthcare professionals, which focuses on 'safety at home' and is integrated into the context of the consultation or visit. Participants agreed that an acceptable initial response prioritises child safety and includes emotional support, education about IPV and signposting to IPV services. Participants had conflicting perspectives on what constitutes acceptable engagement with children and management of safety. Sensitivity analysis produced similar results.

Conclusions: Healthcare and social service professionals should receive sufficient training and ongoing individual and system-level support to provide acceptable identification of and initial response to children's exposure to IPV. Ideal identification and responses should use a phased approach to enquiry and the WHO Listen, Inquire about needs and concerns, Validate, Enhance safety and Support principles integrated into a trauma-informed and violence-informed model of care.

Keywords: child protection; public health; qualitative research; social medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of studies through the review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methodological quality of the studies as assessed by the modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (score range 0–20). Studies scored≥15 are in the top tertile.

References

    1. WHO. Health care for women subjected to intimate partner violence or sexual violence. 2014.
    1. Feder G, MacMillan HL. Intimate partner violence : Goldman L, Schafer AI, Goldman’s Cecil Medicine. 25th ed Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2015.
    1. WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and nonpartner sexual violence. Italy: WHO, 2013.
    1. García-Moreno C, Jansen H, Ellsberg M, et al. . WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2005.
    1. MacMillan HL, Wathen CN. Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2014;23:295–308. 10.1016/j.chc.2013.12.008
    1. Radford L, Hester M. Mothering through domestic violence. London; Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2006.
    1. Finkelhor D, Turner HA, Shattuck A, et al. . Prevalence of Childhood Exposure to Violence, Crime, and Abuse: Results From the National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:746–54. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0676
    1. McTavish JR, MacGregor JC, Wathen CN, et al. . Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence: an overview. Int Rev Psychiatry 2016;28:1–15. 10.1080/09540261.2016.1205001
    1. Holden GW. Children exposed to domestic violence and child abuse: terminology and taxonomy. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2003;6:151–60. 10.1023/A:1024906315255
    1. Government HM. Working together to safeguard children. A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children: HM Government, 2015.
    1. NICE. Domestic violence and abuse: how social care, health services and those they work with can respond effectively. London: NICE, 2014.
    1. WHO. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 2013.
    1. PreVAiL. VEGA (Violence, Evidence, Guidance and Action) Project: a public health response to family violence. Secondary VEGA (Violence, Evidence, Guidance and Action) Project: a public health response to family violence. .
    1. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. Third edition Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
    1. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
    1. CRD. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care Dissemination CfRa D, Centre for reviews and dissemination: University of York, 2009.
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1–e34. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
    1. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, et al. . Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:181 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
    1. Booth A. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Syst Rev 2016;5:74 10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x
    1. Howarth E, Moore THM, Welton NJ, et al. . IMPRoving Outcomes for children exposed to domestic ViolencE (IMPROVE): an evidence synthesis. Public Health Res 2016;4:1–342. 10.3310/phr04100
    1. CASP. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13. Secondary Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13 2013. .
    1. McTavish JR, Kimber M, Devries K, et al. . Mandated reporters' experiences with reporting child maltreatment: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013942 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013942
    1. Carroll C, Booth A. Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed? Res Synth Methods 2015;6:149–54. 10.1002/jrsm.1128
    1. Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, et al. . Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:22–37. 10.1001/archinte.166.1.22
    1. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:45 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
    1. Hannes K, Lockwood C. Synthesising qualitative research: choosing the right approach. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
    1. Noyes J, Hannes K, Booth A, et al. . Chapter 20: Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews : Higgins J, Green S, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.3.0 (updated October 2015): The Cochrane Collaboration, 2015.
    1. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:59 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant 2002;36:391–409. 10.1023/A:1020909529486
    1. Shim WS, Haight WL. Supporting battered women and their children: perspectives of battered mothers and child welfare professionals. Child Youth Serv Rev 2006;28:620–37. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.06.005
    1. Buckley H, Whelan S, Carr N. ‘Like waking up in a Franz Kafka novel’: Service users' experiences of the child protection system when domestic violence and acrimonious separations are involved. Child Youth Serv Rev 2011;33:126–33. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.022
    1. Buckley H, Whelan S, Carr N, et al. . Service users’ perceptions of the Irish Child Protection System. The Stationery Office. Dublin: Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs, 2008.
    1. Stanley N, Miller P, Richardson Foster H. Engaging with children’s and parents' perspectives on domestic violence. Child Fam Soc Work 2012;17:192–201. 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00832.x
    1. Stanley N, Miller P, Richardson Foster H, et al. . Children and families experiencing domestic violence: Police and children’s social services' responses. London: NSPCC University of Lancashire, 2010.
    1. Drinkwater J, Stanley N, Szilassy E, et al. . Juggling confidentiality and safety: a qualitative study of how general practice clinicians document domestic violence in families with children. Br J Gen Pract 2017;67:e437–e444. 10.3399/bjgp17X689353
    1. Szilassy E, Das J, Drinkwater J, et al. ; Researching Education to Strengthen Primary care ON Domestic violence & Safeguarding (RESPONDS). Final Report for the Department of Health, Policy Research Programme Project. Bristol: University of Bristol, 2015.
    1. Szilassy E, Drinkwater J, Hester M, et al. . Making the links between domestic violence and child safeguarding: an evidence-based pilot training for general practice. Health Soc Care Community 2017;25 10.1111/hsc.12401
    1. Larkins C, Drinkwater J, Hester M, et al. . General practice clinicians' perspectives on involving and supporting children and adult perpetrators in families experiencing domestic violence and abuse. Fam Pract 2015;32:cmv070–5. 10.1093/fampra/cmv070
    1. Clarke A, Wydall S. From ‘Rights to Action’: practitioners' perceptions of the needs of children experiencing domestic violence. Child Fam Soc Work 2015;20:181–90. 10.1111/cfs.12066
    1. Black S, Dempsey SH, Davis MB. Practitioner-recommended policies and procedures for children exposed to domestic violence. Health Promot Pract 2010;11:900–7. 10.1177/1524839909359895
    1. Davidov DM, Jack SM, Frost SS, et al. . Mandatory reporting in the context of home visitation programs: intimate partner violence and children’s exposure to intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women 2012;18:595–610. 10.1177/1077801212453278
    1. Randell KA, Bledsoe LK, Shroff PL, et al. . Educational interventions for intimate partner violence: guidance from survivors. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:1190–6. 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318271be7f
    1. Meyer S. ‘Acting in the children’s best interest?': Examining victims' responses to intimate partner Violence. J Child Fam Stud 2011;20:436–43. 10.1007/s10826-010-9410-7
    1. Morris A. Safety and resiliency at home: voices of children from a primary care population: The University of Melbourne, 2015. Unpublished PhD thesis.
    1. Jenney A, Mishna F, Alaggia R, et al. . Doing the right thing? (Re) Considering risk assessment and safety planning in child protection work with domestic violence cases. Child Youth Serv Rev 2014;47:92–101. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.07.015
    1. Angelo M, Isidoro Prado S, Ai CC, et al. . Nurses' experiences caring for child victims of domestic violence: a phenomenological analysis. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem 2013;22:585–92.
    1. MacMillan HL, Fleming J, Jamieson E. Psychiatric assessment of children and adolescents Goldbloom R, Pediatric Clinical Skills. 4th ed New York: Churchill Linvingstone, 2010:2062–14.
    1. VEGA. Trauma- and violence-informed care. Briefing note. Secondary Trauma- and violence-informed care. Briefing note. 2016. .
    1. WHO. Update of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) guidelines for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. 2015;72 .
    1. Stanley N. Children experiencing domestic violence: a research review. Dartington: Research in practice, 2011.
    1. Stanley N, Humphreys C. Domestic violence and protecting children: new thinking and approaches. London; Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2015.
    1. Turner W, Hester M, Broad J, et al. . Interventions to Improve the Response of Professionals to Children Exposed to Domestic Violence and Abuse: A Systematic Review. Child Abuse Rev 2017;26:19–39. 10.1002/car.2385
    1. Zaher E, Keogh K, Ratnapalan S. Effect of domestic violence training: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician 2014. 60 e340–7.
    1. García-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira AF, et al. . The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet 2015;385:1567–79. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61837-7
    1. Dmytryshyn AL, Jack SM, Ballantyne M, et al. . Long-term home visiting with vulnerable young mothers: an interpretive description of the impact on public health nurses. BMC Nurs 2015;14 10.1186/s12912-015-0061-2
    1. Conrad D, Kellar-Guenther Y. Compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among Colorado child protection workers. Child Abuse Negl 2006;30:1071–80. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.03.009
    1. Slattery SM, Goodman LA. Secondary traumatic stress among domestic violence advocates: workplace risk and protective factors. Violence Against Women 2009;15:1358–79. 10.1177/1077801209347469
    1. Munro E, Education D. Department for Education. The Munro review of child protection: final report. A child- centred system: The Stationery Office Limited, 2011.
    1. Tehrani N. Managing trauma in the workplace: supporting workers and organisations. Hove, East Sussex; New York: Routledge, 2011.
    1. Phillips H, Lyon E, Fabri M, et al. . Promising practices and model programs: trauma-informed approaches to working with survivors of domestic and sexual violence and other trauma: Domestic Violence, Trauma & Mental Health, 2015. .
    1. Ponic P, Varcoe C, Smutylo T. Trauma- (and violence-) informed approaches to supporting victims of violence: policy and practice considerations: Government of Canada, Department of Justice, 2016. .
    1. Hester M, et al. . Children protection and domestic violence: findings from a Rowntree/NSPCC study : Hanmer J, Itzin C, Quaid S, Wigglesworth D, Home thruth about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice: a reader. London and New York: Routledge, 2000:96–112.
    1. McGee C. Childhood experiences of domestic violence. London; Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2000.
    1. Mullender A. Children’s perspectives on domestic violence. London: Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE, 2002.
    1. Radford L, Aitken R, Miller P, et al. . Meeting the needs of children living with domestic violence in London. Research report. London: NSPCC and Refuge, 2011.
    1. Overlien C. Children exposed to domestic violence conclusions from the literature and challenges ahead. J Soc Work 2010;10:80–97.
    1. Cater Åsa, Øverlien C. Children exposed to domestic violence: a discussion about research ethics and researchers’ responsibilities. Nordic Social Work Research 2014;4:67–79. 10.1080/2156857X.2013.801878
    1. UN. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Treaty Series 1989. .
    1. Mayall B. Towards a sociology for childhood: thinking from children’s lives. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2002.
    1. Garcia L, Soria C, Hurwitz EL. Homicides and Intimate Partner Violence. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007;8:370–83. 10.1177/1524838007307294
    1. Reisenhofer S, Taft A. Women’s journey to safety - the transtheoretical model in clinical practice when working with women experiencing intimate partner violence: a scientific review and clinical guidance. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:536–48. 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.004
    1. Humphreys C. Problems in the system of mandatory reporting of children living with domestic violence. J Fam Stud 2008;14:228–39. 10.5172/jfs.327.14.2-3.228
    1. Dubowitz H. World perspectives on child abuse: International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. 2014.
    1. Mathews B. Mandatory reporting laws: their origin, nature, and development over time : Mathews B, Bross DC, Mandatory reporting laws and the identification of severe child abuse and neglect. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015:25.
    1. Varcoe C, Ford-Gilboe M, Smye V, et al. . VEGA briefing note on trauma- and violence-informed care. 2016.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit